I want to believe Hillary will be bad for me! Help me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do you feel about 65,000 refugees coming in when the current system has proven faulty with people with active tb being admitted and not proven vetting system. How about immigration and illegal immigration being referred to as the same - meaning if you speak out against illegal immigration you are labeled anti-immigration.

You're going to get bent out of shape over 65k people? They screen fewer to attend a 'skins game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you feel about 65,000 refugees coming in when the current system has proven faulty with people with active tb being admitted and not proven vetting system. How about immigration and illegal immigration being referred to as the same - meaning if you speak out against illegal immigration you are labeled anti-immigration.

You're going to get bent out of shape over 65k people? They screen fewer to attend a 'skins game.

Sorry, more... About 20k more

[Anonymous]

65,000 is only the first onslaught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:65,000 is only the first onslaught.

No, because Congress caps the funding and has forever.... Please read previous post which included numbers. We accept refugees from all over the world, so this is not all from Syria. Google is your friend/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:65,000 is only the first onslaught.

I don't know what y'all are worried about. It's worked out great for Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you feel about 65,000 refugees coming in when the current system has proven faulty with people with active tb being admitted and not proven vetting system. How about immigration and illegal immigration being referred to as the same - meaning if you speak out against illegal immigration you are labeled anti-immigration.

You're going to get bent out of shape over 65k people? They screen fewer to attend a 'skins game.

Bush responded to 9/11 by electing to fight terrorism at its home bases. I guess we are done with that strategy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:65,000 is only the first onslaught.

I don't know what y'all are worried about. It's worked out great for Europe.

Exactly. And they can't send them back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the sort of person who enjoys hearing the perspective of those who disagree with me. I think it's a way of keeping myself grounded-- of not living in a bubble. I want to feel as though I've left no stone unturned when making a decision.

Personally, I feel that Hillary is a political animal. She eats, sleeps, and breathes Washinton politics. She is calculated, mechanical, and everything she does is premeditated. She has spent so long in the political spotlight that she probably can't remember what it is to be candid. But, I think she's intelligent, driven, "a fighter" (to quote her opponent), and when you look at her history of public service, she wants to serve the people. She is well-versed in presidential politics, and I choose to view that as a good thing: there won't be any learning curve for her figure out some way, any way, to try to work WITH the other party. In short, while I don't feel much connection to her, I feel her drawbacks (DC insider who rubs elbows with big-shots, using a personal server to evade scrutiny, being married to an unfaithful two-term pres...) won't impact me, the "little guy", in an adverse way. On the other hand, an untested, former reality star who made his mark in real estate, casinos, and branding--with his own questionable personality quirks--kind of embarrasses me. Oddly enough, I feel that had greater potential to impact my life.

What am I not seeing?

What on earth drives you to this conclusion? She wants to serve only herself, OP.

I seriously wonder how people arrive to this brilliant conclusion about any politician.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you feel about 65,000 refugees coming in when the current system has proven faulty with people with active tb being admitted and not proven vetting system. How about immigration and illegal immigration being referred to as the same - meaning if you speak out against illegal immigration you are labeled anti-immigration.

You're going to get bent out of shape over 65k people? They screen fewer to attend a 'skins game.

NP. I won't, for a number of reasons. But you will when their kids will inundate the schools near you. I think I may even enjoy your squealing in the DC Schools forum