No one on this thread seems like an educator or anyone with boots on the ground. Most of the arguments seem to come directly from some political platform or they are begrudging others for not having the same opinion about how public finances should be spent. My god - the broad assumptions and the shortsightedness about education and the residents that live all across this city. I hope to god that these people are not policy wonks. |
The data sets are insufficient to prove one way or the other. I think both sides can STFU - neither has a well formed study to say what is or isn't a factor. Instead there's a lot of mud slinging based on misused data. It would do well for anyone to be humble about their school - it's not that easy to be statistically better / worse. In fact, there isn't even a single definition of what makes a school good. Unless your definition of better / worse is simply based on the number of high SES students, in which case... knock yourself out. That's easy data to come by. |
Thank you for assuring us that you are indeed not an educator. You are just the everyday garden variety racist, elitist troll. By the way, that earlier post was not limited to charter teachers exiting to teach at DCPS only. The teachers leave to teach at all the surrounding jurisdictions and beyond. Heck, my kid does not have a dedicated math teacher this year. The last one left for greener pastures, and it's been difficult finding a replacement. And those greener pastures in the city and counties all have those dastardly unions with better pay and benefits. Gentrification has not made it better. Gentrification hasn't made it better, or worse. The charter schools are still predominantly minority, just like DCPS. Charter schools with majority-minority are outperforming the more diverse charters, so gentrification has had no effect there. However, I do agree with your statemeant that charters have made schooling better in this city. Why? Because charters have the luxury and flexibility to subtlety choose and/or retain their students. Whereas, DCPS does not. Charters have fewer kids and less bull crap bureaucracy. Charters can specialize, whereas DCPS must attempt to be all things to everybody, which is impossible. It shouldn't be a competition, but a coordinated effort for the two to work on behalf for all the students. With charter advocates like you PP, that's an impossibility. |
Right so anyone who disagrees with anything is a troll/racist right what bs Ready for some facts DCPS has sucked for decades reasons.... A large black population who could care less about education..... Teachersbacked by unions who could care less about education Over the past 20 years things have begun to get better for a different set of reasons 1. The area is gentrifying meaning there are less low SES african americans as a percentage of the school population (at least in the lower grades) meaning the students are higher quality 2. Charters have begun to operate giving all students better options with teachers who actually care and are motivated. These are the facts..... deal with it.... |
Well there is reality, and then there's you PP. Have fun under your bridge. |