Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ Blame the Obama administration for lying in the first place and continuing that lie with the families of the fallen.

Non sequitur. All that happened was confused messaging during the fog of war, not overt, intentional lying (and to date there has been zero evidence of overt, intentional lying).

It is not at all a reasonable response to then take the next two years diverting Congress away from important work that needs to be done, to waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, fruitless investigations, and to have this dominate the 24 hour news cycle in conservative media for TWO FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT.

This was from the start, and still is, nothing but a witch hunt and manufactured outrage with zero real goal other than to drive divisive partisanship.

There were no “confused messages” due to “the fog of war.”
There were lies and more lies to cover up the first lies.
The American public was lied to as were the families of the fallen.
You all have drunk the Kool aid.
And, the Republicans do not need to drive divisive partisanship. Obama does that quite well on his own.

[Anonymous]

This is truly disturbing. "Perverse" in describing Republicans is correct. I hope the Democrats highlight this.

[Anonymous]

Fox Parrots continue to squawk the same misinformation over and over and over again and refuse to stop ant think about their stunning hypocrisy. This is why the Republican Party is shrinking. Everyone with a half a brain can see that Benghazi is nothing but a political dog and pony show to take down Hillary Clinton. It is beyond a shame to use those four brave victims like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fox Parrots continue to squawk the same misinformation over and over and over again and refuse to stop ant think about their stunning hypocrisy. This is why the Republican Party is shrinking. Everyone with a half a brain can see that Benghazi is nothing but a political dog and pony show to take down Hillary Clinton. It is beyond a shame to use those four brave victims like that.

Hillary is doing a nice job taking herself down through her own illegal actions. Of course, if we just were good little sheep and left Hillary alone, she could continue with her corrupt ways in peace....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ Blame the Obama administration for lying in the first place and continuing that lie with the families of the fallen.

Non sequitur. All that happened was confused messaging during the fog of war, not overt, intentional lying (and to date there has been zero evidence of overt, intentional lying).

It is not at all a reasonable response to then take the next two years diverting Congress away from important work that needs to be done, to waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, fruitless investigations, and to have this dominate the 24 hour news cycle in conservative media for TWO FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT.

This was from the start, and still is, nothing but a witch hunt and manufactured outrage with zero real goal other than to drive divisive partisanship.

There were no “confused messages” due to “the fog of war.”
There were lies and more lies to cover up the first lies.
The American public was lied to as were the families of the fallen.
You all have drunk the Kool aid.
And, the Republicans do not need to drive divisive partisanship. Obama does that quite well on his own.

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ Blame the Obama administration for lying in the first place and continuing that lie with the families of the fallen.

Non sequitur. All that happened was confused messaging during the fog of war, not overt, intentional lying (and to date there has been zero evidence of overt, intentional lying).

It is not at all a reasonable response to then take the next two years diverting Congress away from important work that needs to be done, to waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, fruitless investigations, and to have this dominate the 24 hour news cycle in conservative media for TWO FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT.

This was from the start, and still is, nothing but a witch hunt and manufactured outrage with zero real goal other than to drive divisive partisanship.

There were no “confused messages” due to “the fog of war.”
There were lies and more lies to cover up the first lies.
The American public was lied to as were the families of the fallen.
You all have drunk the Kool aid.
And, the Republicans do not need to drive divisive partisanship. Obama does that quite well on his own.

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

Enough of the lying bs. WJC believed they had WMD's. The intel said he had them. For it to be lying you have to have reports that say one thing and you say another. And by pushing this lying thing you make everyone, including those on the intel committees, look like total idiots or at the very least incompetent buffoons.

[Anonymous]

Enough of the lying bs. WJC believed they had WMD's. The intel said he had them. For it to be lying you have to have reports that say one thing and you say another. And by pushing this lying thing you make everyone, including those on the intel committees, look like total idiots or at the very least incompetent buffoons.

+10000

[Anonymous]

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

We were wrong. Not lied to. Here is a fact: the military and others advised that withdrawing from Iraq would leave a void. Obama and Clinton chose to do it, anyway. Fact.

[Anonymous]

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

We were wrong. Not lied to. Here is a fact: the military and others advised that withdrawing from Iraq would leave a void. Obama and Clinton chose to do it, anyway. Fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

We were wrong. Not lied to. Here is a fact: the military and others advised that withdrawing from Iraq would leave a void. Obama and Clinton chose to do it, anyway. Fact.

Regardless, we entered into a war for no reason. 9/11 happened and there were few hearings on how it could have been allowed to happen by the Bush administration. It is clear that this Benghazi nonsense is purely politically motivated and, I agree, is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ Blame the Obama administration for lying in the first place and continuing that lie with the families of the fallen.

Non sequitur. All that happened was confused messaging during the fog of war, not overt, intentional lying (and to date there has been zero evidence of overt, intentional lying).

It is not at all a reasonable response to then take the next two years diverting Congress away from important work that needs to be done, to waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, fruitless investigations, and to have this dominate the 24 hour news cycle in conservative media for TWO FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT.

This was from the start, and still is, nothing but a witch hunt and manufactured outrage with zero real goal other than to drive divisive partisanship.

There were no “confused messages” due to “the fog of war.”
There were lies and more lies to cover up the first lies.
The American public was lied to as were the families of the fallen.
You all have drunk the Kool aid.
And, the Republicans do not need to drive divisive partisanship. Obama does that quite well on his own.

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

Enough of the lying bs. WJC believed they had WMD's. The intel said he had them. For it to be lying you have to have reports that say one thing and you say another. And by pushing this lying thing you make everyone, including those on the intel committees, look like total idiots or at the very least incompetent buffoons.

The people who "believed" did so because they had no idea that the diagrams of "mobile bioweapons labs" that Colin Powell showed in Congress, and the little vials of white powder that he held up, were completely fake. They had no idea that the supposed "yellowcake uranium from Niger" was fake. A lot of people believed because the lie had not yet been exposed.

[Anonymous]

Disgusting. No other word for it. Simply disgusting.


We were attached on our shores by our own airplanes and there was warning that foreign terrorists were planning on doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We were lied to about Iraq. And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt. Where was our outrage then?

We were wrong. Not lied to. Here is a fact: the military and others advised that withdrawing from Iraq would leave a void. Obama and Clinton chose to do it, anyway. Fact.

Regardless, we entered into a war for no reason. 9/11 happened and there were few hearings on how it could have been allowed to happen by the Bush administration. It is clear that this Benghazi nonsense is purely politically motivated and, I agree, is disgusting.

NP

Information is a good thing!! Sometimes it even bites partisanship in the ass.

Few hearings? There were MASSIVE reviews including every agency that had any connection to any information and any part. It changed the whole intel community and how they cooperate. Which was one of the biggest problems that led up to 9/11...they weren't talking to each other as they should have.

And Bush didn't allow it to happen. Did Clinton allow the Cole? Hell, the plans and procedures for 9/11 began in the Clinton admin. And please don't come back with that 8/6/200 memo crap. It's in the report.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-911REPORT/pdf/GPO-911REPORT.pdf

And yes Benghazi became political. But attempting to compare it to another time/incident...is worthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disgusting. No other word for it. Simply disgusting.


We were attached on our shores by our own airplanes and there was warning that foreign terrorists were planning on doing it.

No there was NOT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disgusting. No other word for it. Simply disgusting.


We were attached on our shores by our own airplanes and there was warning that foreign terrorists were planning on doing it.

Yeah.... why didn’t Clinton do anything? He had a chance to take down Bin Laden....