Why does Kate Middleton look so old?

[Anonymous]

I think any of us could have a bad picture floating around somewhere out there. And we could look ten yrs older.

I don't think she looks younger or older than her 33 yrs.

I think she looks exactly her age.

[Anonymous]

I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.

Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's British, very thin, has had two kids, and is mid-30s. She looks exactly how I would expect.

+1. That fair, delicate British skin is lovely when we're kids but not so much after childbearing and entering middle age. Sigh.

Yes. She did not win the genetic lottery so she is aging as expected.

But that hair and makeup need updating. The hot-rollered hair especially looks ridiculous on a mid-30s mother.

I posted the comment you're replying to, PP, but I think she won a LOT in the genetic lottery. Yes, delicate skin. But she's tall, willowy, has great hair and a beautiful smile - I'd take that. I agree with others that the camera-ready makeup looks great from afar but is aging up close. Ugh, I'm so glad I'm not famous.

I think she has to look proper as the future Queen. If you look at photos from her student days, she had a much younger style. Royal etiquette and all that...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.

Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.

+100!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.

Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.

+1
This thread is ridiculous .Sounds like some Kardashians fans on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.

Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.

+1
This thread is ridiculous .Sounds like some Kardashians fans on this thread.

Kardashians have better but nasty dumpy body shapes

[Anonymous]

Is OP the Lightly Fried Tuna poster? If so, you have way too much time on your hands and you spend way too much of your life obsessing on Kate Middleton. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Kate Middleton looks so old because she is a smoker. It ages you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:she needs less eyeliner, but other than that, she looks like a 33 year old who has not had botox or fillers and is photographed constantly without filters in harsh light. I am sure if we all were subjected to the same, we would look worse.

Her eyeliner is tattooed on. She can't get rid of it.

Don't use permanent make-up, kids!

[Anonymous]

Dieting, cigs, and sun. She looks a decade older than 33 as a result but, as others have said, has lots of good points to work with (smile, hair, lean frame, nice legs).

[Anonymous]

She's underweight, she has a history of smoking and tanning (both of which age your skin), she's fair skinned which doesn't help, and she has a bad case of collapsing face from using Botox and fillers. Case closed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dieting, cigs, and sun. She looks a decade older than 33 as a result but, as others have said, has lots of good points to work with (smile, hair, lean frame, nice legs).

Eh unfortunately for her, she has to dress pretty dowdy (skirts to knee, etc.). I bet she'd like to show her legs off more. She works hard for them.

[Anonymous]

I was positive her eyeliner was tatted on but here is a pic of her without it!

http://img.wennermedia.com/social/kate-middleton-1-b7fd63d9-e1f6-4e23-aeeb-7ff1e4eb431c.jpg

[Anonymous]

She looks great to me.

[Anonymous]

She is a beautiful woman, but she DOES have more wrinkles than she would have had if she were not a smoker.