| she needs less eyeliner, but other than that, she looks like a 33 year old who has not had botox or fillers and is photographed constantly without filters in harsh light. I am sure if we all were subjected to the same, we would look worse. |
|
| yeah, sorry, but she looks like a mid thirties mom of two, and you found crazy unflattering/pregnant/harsh light wrinkled forehead shots of her. She is a beautiful, slim girl, who usually looks great. I cannot imagine what I would look like in close up preg shots inbetween hair appointments. And she does not use botox, so her forehead wrinkles. She does not look old. She looks 33. She is 33. |
Oh yeah, this thread is all about you. |
| The troll is having nervous breakdown today |
ha, Only on dcum. You are all kidding yourselves if you think you look better. Only in your own mirrors and heads. Not if you were being photographed constantly from a long range lens throughout your second pregnancy. She is a beautiful girl and this thread is ridiculous. I am so tired of reading people's own estimations of how young they look and hot they are on this forum. Only in your heads, you deluded ladies. |
+1 |
| Not that attractive actually. Yawn. |
She's 33. |
| so what? Kate Middleton is not a former model now an actress. She clearly hasn't done the standard Hollywood work. Why does she have to? She is a pretty, polished, relatively normal looking, but much thinner and better groomed woman. She looks nice always. |
Hina rabbani khar- 37 years old
Amal alamuddin 37 |
| Amal in my opinion such an unattractive woman.And it has nothing to do with her "age".Just don't understand media obsession with her lately. |
She has exactly ZERO kids. It is all about the kids. Women who don't have any age way better than those of us who do. |
| The two kids excuse doesn't work. Not one of these pics was taken after she had two kids. |
| I would looooove to see some of you post your ugly ass lumpy bodies and busted faces on here. I'd rip you Heffernan to pieces. |