Menendez to be Indicted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge William H. Walls denied Senator Bob Menendez’s motion for a mistrial in the federal bribery trial.

What a shameful lying crook. A lobbyist had once introduced me to him.

[Anonymous]

So why aren't any of his fellow Democrats ndemanding that he step down?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So why aren't any of his fellow Democrats ndemanding that he step down?

They need the vote. What's a little corruption among friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Menendez will resign after the NJ governor election in one week. Murphy will appointment Menendez's Democrat replacement.

Murphy doesn't take office until January 16.

He can resign with an effective date of January 16. It takes 66 senators to expel one, there's no way Democrats would go along if Republicans tried to force him to leave earlier.

Seriously, given the level of criminality in the WH and Senate right now. I mean, we have a POTUS flagrantly violating the Emoluments clause.

sounds like a laxative product

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

Ha! Crickets.
You hypocrites can't be taken seriously about Roy Moore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So why aren't any of his fellow Democrats ndemanding that he step down?

A phrase I've been hearing a lot around Washington lately is "if these charges are proven."

Can't remember where I heard it...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

The allegations, IF TRUE...

Jury is deadlocked. They’re going to have to try him again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

The allegations, IF TRUE...

Jury is deadlocked. They’re going to have to try him again.

The jury is a mess. One juror was dismissed because she had a planned vacation (judge knew about this in advance and let her leave). She spoke with the press, said she would have voted not guilty. Then, the judge asked the jury today if they had read or heard any news about this case. Several had.
WTH?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

The allegations, IF TRUE...

Jury is deadlocked. They’re going to have to try him again.

For what? Bribery? Or flying down to the Dominican Republic for sex with underage prostitutes? Or both?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Menendez was indicted on corruption charges today:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/

He MUST step down. Why isn't he, Liberals?

The allegations, IF TRUE...

Jury is deadlocked. They’re going to have to try him again.

For what? Bribery? Or flying down to the Dominican Republic for sex with underage prostitutes? Or both?

Maybe click on the link above? Or on this one?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/08/politics/menendez-trial-highlights/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing the lack of reporting on this. The first sitting senator in a hundred years on trial for bribery and it's somehow not news?

Astonishing that he hasn't yet resigned.

Not astonishing at all. He's innocent until proven guilty.

Your posts about Moore seem to suggest otherwise, unless there is a different standard when comparing someone with ACTUAL charges (Menendez) vs allegations (Moore)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So why aren't any of his fellow Democrats ndemanding that he step down?

A phrase I've been hearing a lot around Washington lately is "if these charges are proven."

Can't remember where I heard it...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing the lack of reporting on this. The first sitting senator in a hundred years on trial for bribery and it's somehow not news?

Astonishing that he hasn't yet resigned.

Not astonishing at all. He's innocent until proven guilty.

Your posts about Moore seem to suggest otherwise, unless there is a different standard when comparing someone with ACTUAL charges (Menendez) vs allegations (Moore)

You guessed it: an election is not a criminal proceeding. Roy Moore does not have a right under the Sixth Amendment to a U.S. Senate seat. Congratulations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing the lack of reporting on this. The first sitting senator in a hundred years on trial for bribery and it's somehow not news?

Astonishing that he hasn't yet resigned.

Not astonishing at all. He's innocent until proven guilty.

Your posts about Moore seem to suggest otherwise, unless there is a different standard when comparing someone with ACTUAL charges (Menendez) vs allegations (Moore)

You guessed it: an election is not a criminal proceeding. Roy Moore does not have a right under the Sixth Amendment to a U.S. Senate seat. Congratulations?

what right has he lost? I don't recall him being convicted of anything?