Guys - ripped vs soft women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So you like fake tits, I gather.

Thank you, PP! There is NO WAY a woman can be that slim and toned everywhere, and then have those big boobs! It just doesn't work that way, and infuriates me that this is some kind of ideal. The only way to get that way is through surgery.

Fascinating pics of the % body fat upthread. The dudes below 20% look gross. I don't understand the fascination with Tatum Channing, for example. He is too muscular. It freaks me out. And I'm a straight woman, btw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Thank you, PP! There is NO WAY a woman can be that slim and toned everywhere, and then have those big boobs! It just doesn't work that way, and infuriates me that this is some kind of ideal. The only way to get that way is through surgery.

Fascinating pics of the % body fat upthread. The dudes below 20% look gross. I don't understand the fascination with Tatum Channing, for example. He is too muscular. It freaks me out. And I'm a straight woman, btw.

I mean, the nipples in the second photo are just silly. I'm lucky to have large, natural boobs that are decently perky, and my nipples don't sit 2/3 of the way up my boobs. They're practically pointing upward. The first woman looks like her tits might be choking her.

[Anonymous]

Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

So fat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

So fat?

Troll troll, go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

So fat?

Troll troll, go away.

Not a troll no muscle means not thin, nor at a normal weight. I'm sorry if you where offended but if the sexiest woman of all time lifted weights why can't it be sexy. She was a size 12 which now days because of vanity sizing is actually a size 8.


[/img]http://www.marilynmonroepages.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/shape-1.jpg[/img]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

Mama June? Really, that's your preferred type? Do you really mean NO muscle definition?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Soft, for sure. No muscle definition.

So fat?

Troll troll, go away.

Not a troll no muscle means not thin, nor at a normal weight. I'm sorry if you where offended but if the sexiest woman of all time lifted weights why can't it be sexy. She was a size 12 which now days because of vanity sizing is actually a size 8.


[/img]http://www.marilynmonroepages.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/shape-1.jpg[/img]

Lifting weights a few times wont give muscle definition, which Marilyn did not have.

This is a preference btw, one that many men have. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the male magazines that hire women like Kate Upton and Robin Lawley.

[Anonymous]

[/img]http://www.marilynmonroepages.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/shape-2.jpg[/img]

[Anonymous]

^LOL what even are those moves? Looks like she is just fooling around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So, when she became famous, she never worked out? This was when she shot to fame and became the international sex symbol? I'd say thats another vote for the "soft" category. Not to mention lifting light weights for ten minutes is definitely not enough to make someone have muscle definition, and will in fact keep them soft, which Marilyn definitely was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^LOL what even are those moves? Looks like she is just fooling around.

Gotta love them though. I'm sure women here and some men assume weight lifting will make you look like a man. Which is my point of putting the Marliyn images. I see it with my co workers who are overweight, I can understand having health concerns but I see a lot of exuses for women not even working out or even attempting to be healthy. Men, on here might say they like soft women but I doubt they mean women who are size 14 unless that is there preference and that should be respected. However, women who choose to excerise should be respected for wanting a certain body type.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[/img]http://www.marilynmonroepages.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/shape-2.jpg[/img]

I'm not sure what's the point of this. I see plenty of muscle definition on Marilyn. I don't think pp knows what he's talking about with regards to women's bodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^LOL what even are those moves? Looks like she is just fooling around.

Gotta love them though. I'm sure women here and some men assume weight lifting will make you look like a man. Which is my point of putting the Marliyn images. I see it with my co workers who are overweight, I can understand having health concerns but I see a lot of exuses for women not even working out or even attempting to be healthy. Men, on here might say they like soft women but I doubt they mean women who are size 14 unless that is there preference and that should be respected. However, women who choose to excerise should be respected for wanting a certain body type.

You seem to have a vendetta where you want to prove that women can lift weights. First of all, people dont have to have an "excuse" not to lift weights. They can do exactly as they choose. I personally, dont like muscle on women's bodies, I wouldnt be attractive to a woman with muscle definition. Just my preference.

And I think Marilyn's idea of working out is very different from what we think of nowadays, where women spend an hour or so at the gym or in fitness classes. Women in the 50s had a much more classic silhouette and much less muscle on them, similar to the women in Europe nowadays. Whatever Marilyn is doing in these photos or her ten minutes a day of lifting a light weight is totally unobjectionable and wont lead to any build up of muscle, unlike the women today who are pumping iron at the gym because they (mistakenly) think we will like it.