Unless there is another PS3 school the family is excited about? Or would the 3 year old ultimately transfer to YY after a year? |
+1 I have no idea how you people get spots at multiple great schools, while other people are shut out of decent options entirely. What an effed up system. |
I agree. Our kids aren't laboratory test subjects, people. |
Totally agree. |
| YY does their wait list by application order so it is not luck there. If you want it badly enough you can guarantee yourself a good wait list number by going in person the day the lottery opens. |
That is a good idea! |
Only 2 grades to compare, 2012 numbers: EL Haynes 3rd R = 48% M = 42% YY 3rd R = 66% M = 57% EL Haynes 4th R = 53% M = 51% YY 4th R = 82% M = 71% |
| One question for original posted is if the 3 or 4 year old was the higher one one the waitlist, or did both come off at the same time? Or had the 3 yr old gotten in already and 4 yr old in through sib pref? If it was the 4 yr old who got in and pulled the 3 yr old, that might create problems in that if you decline the 4 yr old, you lose sib pref to pull the 3 yr old and you really are choosing btw the two schools. Otherwise, since YY doesn't have a 3 yr old class, it's perfectly reasonable to split the two up if you really think you might be interested in continuing with YY. I would not do it just to test the two out. Take a day off from work tomorrow to observe the classes at each and make your decision based on actual observation/data, not just the rantings of the rest of us on DCUM. |
|
Only 2 grades to compare, 2012 numbers: EL Haynes 3rd R = 48% M = 42% YY 3rd R = 66% M = 57% EL Haynes 4th R = 53% M = 51% YY 4th R = 82% M = 71% I suggest you do your own research. I have no idea where PP poster got her numbers for YY but when I did some probing on the DC Charter board site for 2012 Composite scores, Haynes had significantly better scores for both their AA and Caucasion students in Math (BIG discrepancy) and for their AA students in Reading (about 4% higher). Haynes scores were a about 1% better for Reading for their Caucasion students. The Hispanic students appeared to really pull down the Reading numbers for Haynes. |
I suggest you do your own research. I have no idea where PP poster got her numbers for YY but when I did some probing on the DC Charter board site for 2012 Composite scores, Haynes had significantly better scores for both their AA and Caucasion students in Math (BIG discrepancy) and for their AA students in Reading (about 4% higher). Haynes scores were a about 1% better for Reading for their Caucasion students. The Hispanic students appeared to really pull down the Reading numbers for Haynes. http://www.greatschools.org/washington-dc/washington/367-E.L.-Haynes-PCS---Georgia-Avenue/?tab=test-scores GreatSchools rating: 7 out of 10 http://www.greatschools.org/washington-dc/washington/618-Washington-Yu-Ying-PCS/?tab=test-scores GreatSchools rating: 9 out of 10 |
|
Here is where you can compare results for EL Haynes and Yu Ying 3rd and 4th graders. In those grades (the only onese tested at Yu Ying so far), Yu Ying did significantly better than EL Haynes in reading and math.
http://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/release_content/attachments/DC%20CAS%20School-by-School%20Performance%20by%20Grade091212.xlsx |
From where are you pulling your numbers? |
The charter board provides different stats than what you provided. Also, 2012 is YY's first year for testing, but I guess that helps when you don't provide all the children with the same opportunities at a charter school. http://www.dcpubliccharter.com/News-Room.aspx?id=276 |
what are you talking about? YY 1st test was 2011. |
I don't think the first year a school administers the DC-CAS that it "counts" for those purposes. |