Huh? Peer effects are extremely important and sizable (that’s Fryer’s JPubE), the teacher/mentor effects are empirically pretty small and underpowered. I think the mentor effect paper is probably “true” they just need better power, but “who” is smart really does matter. |
The research actually backs up what I said pretty well. The whole framework around this comes from Claude Steele and Joshua. What they found is that the real problem is identity safety, meaning a child needs to believe that someone like them can succeed in a given domain. That belief comes from visible successful adults way more than it comes from a classmate sitting next to them. The strongest study people love to cite for race matching in schools is Thomas Dee's "Teachers, Race, and Student Achievement in a Randomized Experiment.”And here is the thing about that study: it is about TEACHERS. Not peers. Not classmates. The research on stereotype threat also specifically notes that providing role models who demonstrate proficiency reduces or eliminates the threat effect entirely (Blanton, Crocker and Miller, 2000). It does not say those role models have to be peers. The important thing is seeing someone like you succeed, and a thriving adult makes that case a lot more powerfully than a fellow 10 year old. |
Stereotype threat is p hacked to hell. It’s not real, and it’ll disappear from the literature over the next decade. Classic bad social psychology from the early times. The teacher effect paper is real, but when you only have 4 clusters, the effect is not robust. Note it ended up in a pretty weak journal because it couldn’t survive robustness checks at higher tier journals. The peer effect literature is recent, strong, has a very good theory behind it, and most importantly replicates. |
No. They were not being inclusive. This individual doesn’t have kids that are the same age as my children. She never bothered to even say hello to me or be nice to my children. At one of our first conversations she launched into me about the importance of sending my kids to Eastern. I note that her daughter goes to SWW now. But it was really important for “diversity” to have our family attend Eliot and Eastern. I never once mentioned that we were thinking of leaving Maury and transferring to a charter school. This woman just launched into her lecture without prompting. You should know she’s not the only one. |
Fair point on stereotype threat, I’ll give you that one. But the peer effects literature you’re citing actually undercuts your own argument when you look closely. The well-replicated finding is that high-achieving peers help students generally. When you control for peer achievement level, the race component mostly disappears. “Peers’ race, ethnicity, income, and parental education have at most very little effect on students’ performance after accounting for peers’ achievement” (Hoxby and Weingarth 2023). So the effect you’re pointing to is about being around high achievers, not same-race high achievers. |
PP here - yes, it’s true. I mean, it’s my one kid’s experience and I can’t speak for others. Also saw another PP’s statement that experienced black teachers have all retired - that’s false. FWIW, I’m white and the Eliot Hine boosterism and guilting is possibly my least favorite part of Maury too. |
I mean.. that samething happened in this very thread.. with a parent suggesting a black family thats inbound for Maury should consider Friendship schools instead. Those types of personalities tend to reveal themselves in various ways and are otherwise avoidable within parent groups. If the child or family isnt feeling supported within the school, thats a different issue. |
So what exactly is the impetus there if not to improve school buy-in and keep peer groups together? It reads as if other parents are pushing this option on other parents while keeping their secret great middle school to themselves.. but there is no other decent option other than trying to transfer into SH, or lottery out where everyone has the same possibility more or less. |
| We are a mixed race family who were able to lottery into a charter from Maury. My youngest is still at Maury and will follow their siblings when the time comes. It also angers me when people complain about people peeling off for charters. They don't understand that if you are white and rich, risking a place like Eliot Hine is no big deal, but if you are dark skinned and barely middle class, it can be the difference between getting in to a good college or not. |
+1 - A white UMC student at EH is viewed as default baseline competent and like academically advanced, not without good reason, frankly. A middle class (or even UMC) black child has to earn that assumption, and likely over and over again. This can be a problem anywhere of course, but more is particularly thorny at schools with predominant low-SES black populations. |
Hugely accurate unfortunately |
SH is equally as bad. If you want to improve school buy-in, push to improve the school. Guilting people into making an objectively poor choice for their children doesn’t work. Also the vast majority are secretly playing the lottery while pretending EH or SH is their first choice. |
I take it you don’t have a kid in EH … if you did you would know that a lot of the historial Maury black staff retired and that EH is a solid choice. |
How do you know SH is equally bad? You have kids at both schools? Almost certainly not. I hate posters who come on here with opinions based on nothing and assert with perfect mediocre white male confidence that whatever their opinion is is objectively correct. We have a smart kid with smart friends doing well at SH. I do not have first hand experience with EH, but anecdotally have heard success stories. FWIW the ES my kid went to didn’t people over going to charters. No one pretended the weren’t trying for Latin at least for the HS guarantee. Basis was a mixed bag depending on the kid. |
| Didn’t *guilt people |