S/O FCPS Per Pupil Spending at High Schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The discussion about how much FCPS is going to be spending per pupil at Skyview led me to question what VDOE has been reporting FCPS as spending per pupil at each high school.

The latest VDOE data is from 2023-24:

Lewis $20,687
Falls Church $20,557
Mount Vernon $20,284
Chantilly $19,562
Annandale: $19,535
West Potomac $19,353
Edison $19,231
Herndon $19,205
Justice $18,837
TJ $18,756 [possibly supplemented with private donations through the TJ Partnership Fund]
Fairfax $18,739
South Lakes $18,524
Centreville $18,413
Marshall $18,371
Madison $18,187
Woodson $18,140
Westfield $18,121
Hayfield $17,776
Robinson $17,658
Lake Braddock $17,519
South County $17,456
McLean $16,934
Langley $16,881
West Springfield $16,729
Oakton $16,676

Some of the differences seem fairly obvious. High schools with more poor kids and/or Academy programs get the most money. The 7-12 secondary schools are reported as getting less money per pupil because less is spent on kids in grades 7-8 than in grades 9-12. High schools with fewer poor kids, no Academy programs, and AP get the least money. However, it's not clear why schools like Madison and Woodson get more per student than South County, or over $1,000 more per student than McLean, Langley, West Springfield, and Oakton.

Why exactly do the RIO mommies want to stay at Oakton?

Langley, McLean, and Oakton don’t have high numbers of ELL or specialized SPED programs, like CSS so the money that they get goes to more of the students instead of being focused on ELL and high need SPED students. They like it that way.

Wrong. Do you ever research before spouting nonsense? DP.
https://langleyhs.fcps.edu/department/special-education

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1228059.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The discussion about how much FCPS is going to be spending per pupil at Skyview led me to question what VDOE has been reporting FCPS as spending per pupil at each high school.

The latest VDOE data is from 2023-24:

Lewis $20,687
Falls Church $20,557
Mount Vernon $20,284
Chantilly $19,562
Annandale: $19,535
West Potomac $19,353
Edison $19,231
Herndon $19,205
Justice $18,837
TJ $18,756 [possibly supplemented with private donations through the TJ Partnership Fund]
Fairfax $18,739
South Lakes $18,524
Centreville $18,413
Marshall $18,371
Madison $18,187
Woodson $18,140
Westfield $18,121
Hayfield $17,776
Robinson $17,658
Lake Braddock $17,519
South County $17,456
McLean $16,934
Langley $16,881
West Springfield $16,729
Oakton $16,676

Some of the differences seem fairly obvious. High schools with more poor kids and/or Academy programs get the most money. The 7-12 secondary schools are reported as getting less money per pupil because less is spent on kids in grades 7-8 than in grades 9-12. High schools with fewer poor kids, no Academy programs, and AP get the least money. However, it's not clear why schools like Madison and Woodson get more per student than South County, or over $1,000 more per student than McLean, Langley, West Springfield, and Oakton.

Why exactly do the RIO mommies want to stay at Oakton?

Langley, McLean, and Oakton don’t have high numbers of ELL or specialized SPED programs, like CSS so the money that they get goes to more of the students instead of being focused on ELL and high need SPED students. They like it that way.

Wrong. Do you ever research before spouting nonsense? DP.
https://langleyhs.fcps.edu/department/special-education

Those are not specialized special education programs. Those are the cat a special education services that every school offers. Langley does not have a CSS program. There is an autism program, but that is like 1 or 2 teachers. Nothing like the extra teachers, admits, counselors associated with CSS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1228059.page

This thread doesn’t reflect a “meltdown,” just information-sharing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1228059.page

This thread doesn’t reflect a “meltdown,” just information-sharing.

How many times do we have to explain this to you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1228059.page

This thread doesn’t reflect a “meltdown,” just information-sharing.

How many times do we have to explain this to you

What’s this “we” nonsense? Just because you hear voices in your head doesn’t mean you should be using a plural pronoun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect that a lot of the "extra" money at the poorer schools is due to additional federal funds.
I'm not sure if the Free and Reduced Lunch funds (federal), ELL instruction (also federal), Special Education funds (is that federal?) are included.

Is there any Title I in high school? That is definitely federal funding.

However, special programs like Academies would also bring extra funds to the school.

So, I don't think FCPS is shorting the schools in wealthier areas like Langley. But, if the Langley parents are upset about paying more taxes and getting less, I understand that there is a school that is very close to many of the families that receives far more funds.

They can get more for their tax dollars and shorten the commute time for their kids. That means more sleep for their kids. And less competition for the top schools. UVA is easier to get into now!

Sounds like a win!

You lost your campaign to get Langley kids moved to Herndon. Are you really going to cry about it for the next five years?

It’s actually your loss because UVa prefers Herndon kids. DP

There’s more to life than UVa, even assuming that’s true (of course, you provided no support).

Every year there is a meltdown in the college forum when Langley kids don’t get in UVA and VT. They obviously would have a better shot from Herndon where they would stand out AND liberal AO’s prefer kids from schools like Herndon.

DP. I'm a regular on the college forum. No one ever talks about which specific high school their kids go to when they throw their tantrums about not getting into VT and UVA. They simply say "FCPS" or "NoVA public". Stop making silly statements.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1228059.page

This thread doesn’t reflect a “meltdown,” just information-sharing.

How many times do we have to explain this to you

What’s this “we” nonsense? Just because you hear voices in your head doesn’t mean you should be using a plural pronoun.

Once you turn to cheap insults you’ve lost. Move on.