| So basically eff straight off to the people defending this. |
He declined to sign the paper that would have immediately sent him to Ireland. |
Deportation is a reasonable consequence for a long term willful civil violation. Long detentions in horrible circumstances are not. That is the part of this process that needs to change. |
But I thought he was staying in detention in order to fight deportation? Others are in detention to avoid flight risk and to facilitate immigration hearings with the subjects actually showing up for them. |
He's self-employed as a plasterer (tradesman, as are many). How's AI going to do that? |
In theory, yes. In practice, the immigration courts are backed up and/or other factors leading to very long detentions. And there is perhaps a perverse incentive to keeping people in detention for a long time because these prisons are for profit. So I don’t think ICE should be detaining people until they know there is a low wait time for court. |
This assumes the green card interview would have confirmed his status. USCIS used to look the other way when there were overstays. No more. |
That’s ridiculous. More like he was speeding 15 years ago, and KEPT ON SPEEDING even though he knew the rules. The thing that changes is that enforcement has been increased. |
So the fact that he applied for a permit to rectify his visa issue and is married to a citizen should mean nothing just because he had previously overstayed? The crime of not getting it right initially, but trying to fix it, means instant deportation or imprisonment? GTFO. He was in the process of trying to get his green card The court could decide if he was eligible or not. Not some goon doing arbitrary sweeps. |
+100 |
| They could have sent him back to Ireland 5 months ago but instead are essentially keeping him in a concentration camp instead? |
Says who? You?! It is all over the press in the UK and Ireland. |
No, he has chosen to stay in detention. He will be released if he agrees to deportation. He will not be released back into the US absent legal status that allows him to stay. That status could be conferred by a judge pending his green card issuance, or not. |
Almost like the system is complex and convoluted, and treating people trying to navigate it like criminals isn't right. |
It's not the same. We're talking about people's lives, not speeding. All this bureaucracy creates crimes. If someone has no criminal history and can get a job with enough income to support themselves, they should be allowed to come and stay so long as they continue to meet that bar. What right do any of us have to tell anyone else that they can't move freely around this planet that belongs to us all? That people suffering violence poverty and corruption must stay and endure that because of where they happened to be born and who their parents were. It's stupid. All of this is stupid. Let people live. |