Why are men so angry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always assumed it was because they were used to the world revolving around them and always getting their way. Now they have to co-exist in a world where women can also do things like hold jobs and vote. Many were raised to believe they could do anything (because in the past they could) and now they struggle with not getting things easy. I think I just described toddlers too. Lol

The problem with these kind of theories is that men today were born and raised after women gained these rights. They have never known a world where women didn't have the right to vote or hold jobs. And the decline in traditional male jobs is mostly due to globalization, not women.

I think you grew up in a bubble if you think the men today were born and raised after women gained equality. First off, women still don't have equality. Second, in most of the country, adults today were still raised in very gendered, traditional communities where men were the breadwinners and women were largely responsible for kids and the home. EVEN if both parents worked. I grew up in the 80s and both of my parents had jobs but my dad never cooked or cleaned at all and my mom's job was treated as extra, or something she did for herself when her childcare/household duties were done. My husband's family was the same, and his mom was even the primary earner in his family for years. But his parents still viewed him dad as the head of the household.

People in their 30s and 40s today were the FIRST generation where many or even most women were raised to believe they could have pretty much any job and could be financially and professionally equal to men. There were women who felt this way before, but they were outliers, the products of unusually feminist and progressive households. It was not until the 1990s that it became fairly standard for people, even in small towns and more traditional communities, to raise girls to assume they would get jobs and have careers and would be financially/professionally equal to men. And therefore it is that generation of men who are contending broadly with what it really looks like for women across the board to have financial equality and independence. It truly is a recent shift.

These women were sold a bill of goods. They may have been brought up to believe that but they have since found out differently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Karens rage at their pumpkin spice lattes, lol. Remember the Karen in NYC who tried to call the cops on a black guy who wasn't doing anything?

Divorce rates by couples go: lesbian > heterosexual > gay.

Who's angry again? Women live in a perpetual state of rage and victimhood.

This

Agree. It's not groups of men organizing "scream groups" to let out all their pent up rage. Why so much rage?

lol. You’re both insane. I have actually witnessed those groups meeting and it’s always men. The forces behind every theater of war on this planet are male rulers, male statesmen, and male soldiers. Keep it up, though. It’s clearly working for you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mostly I see that type of anger and public rage outbursts in white men. And its undoubtedly traced back to feeling of sexual inadequacy from undersized genitalia. You never see Black men losing their minds and raging at women in public. This is white male tiny dick energy at work.

This and white men feel entitled to power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Karens rage at their pumpkin spice lattes, lol. Remember the Karen in NYC who tried to call the cops on a black guy who wasn't doing anything?

Divorce rates by couples go: lesbian > heterosexual > gay.

Who's angry again? Women live in a perpetual state of rage and victimhood.

This

Agree. It's not groups of men organizing "scream groups" to let out all their pent up rage. Why so much rage?

lol. You’re both insane. I have actually witnessed those groups meeting and it’s always men. The forces behind every theater of war on this planet are male rulers, male statesmen, and male soldiers. Keep it up, though. It’s clearly working for you!

I only need to look around at the people I know. Different strokes I guess.

[Anonymous]

Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Being angry is not a crime. They are separate things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Isn't the media run by angry white men?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Isn't the media run by angry white men?

Which media? Mainstream media we're told nobody watches anymore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that most men who are angry aren't getting laid adequately/often enough. Sexual healing is real.

For sure. I also think there’s also a lot of misandry out there, and the Internet is feeding it to them as rage-bait. A working class guy who saw his father work in a factory, get a pension, and own a small house is now has to work two part-time jobs, live in an apartment, and can’t retire. Then he’s told that the world’s problems are mediocre white men’s fault. Essentially, everything’s worse and it’s his fault.

I'd say about 80% of the angry ranting people I see in DC are Black men.

You’re not supposed to Notice.

Oh shut up both of you. We are still very segregated in this country, so if you are in a place that has mostly black residents, it will be black men. In other places with fewer black residents, it will be white men. Whatever. This isn't a race problem. This is a larger societal problem.

[Anonymous]

I was in Europe for two weeks. Noticeably lacking white male rage and misogyny. No one was driving a big truck to compensate, gay guys walking around holding hands, effeminate men just being themselves. It was liberating and fresh.
What are they doing right that we aren’t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Oh, well, then, no rioting but the white men are just shooting people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was in Europe for two weeks. Noticeably lacking white male rage and misogyny. No one was driving a big truck to compensate, gay guys walking around holding hands, effeminate men just being themselves. It was liberating and fresh.
What are they doing right that we aren’t?

Were you in a city or out in the countryside?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Oh, well, then, no rioting but the white men are just shooting people.

Can we see a source for your claims?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

Jan6, Kirk was killed by a fellow maga, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that most men who are angry aren't getting laid adequately/often enough. Sexual healing is real.

For sure. I also think there’s also a lot of misandry out there, and the Internet is feeding it to them as rage-bait. A working class guy who saw his father work in a factory, get a pension, and own a small house is now has to work two part-time jobs, live in an apartment, and can’t retire. Then he’s told that the world’s problems are mediocre white men’s fault. Essentially, everything’s worse and it’s his fault.

I'd say about 80% of the angry ranting people I see in DC are Black men.

You’re not supposed to Notice.

Oh shut up both of you. We are still very segregated in this country, so if you are in a place that has mostly black residents, it will be black men. In other places with fewer black residents, it will be white men. Whatever. This isn't a race problem. This is a larger societal problem.

Serious question:

Do you understand proportions?