Coverage of Gaza City Invasion

[Anonymous]

I always used to wonder how the holocaust of WW2 happened. Like, why were so many people complacent?

But now I understand it completely. Israel has clearly shown how.

[Anonymous]

Gaza is a very small area. If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gaza is a very small area. If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already.

They like to do it slowly through starvation. Play with the victims a bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gaza is a very small area. If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already.

They like to do it slowly through starvation. Play with the victims a bit.

Yup, they're just like the Nazi's but much more calculated in their methods.

They've already bombed enough of the hospitals and other life-supporting infrastructure that all they need to do block food in and let Gaza slowly starve to death rather than waste more American bombs. Starving a million plus people will generate less outrage than killing them quickly. That way they can have people like liberal Zionists say stupid stuff like "If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already"

[Anonymous]

Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy moly! Almost 24 hours in to the Gaza City invasion - I’m seeing almost no coverage of the situation. The little reporting I’m seeing is from BBC and Al Jazera. I don’t see how we can have a democracy if we don’t see coverage of major events. Are US outlets being prevented from reporting?

Let’s see:

Epstein
Our President is a rapist
National Guard is being deployed across the nation.
Florida isn’t vaccinating.
Federal workforce gutted with outcomes mentioned per the PP
Kids are being shot in schools again
Russia and China cozying up.

I could go on and on. I think I speak for many when I say that Gaza is the least of my worries.

This is correct. There are some small devoted groups that are super interested in this never ending conflict, but it’s very far away (where is the coverage of Sudan?).

You may think the China/Russia/NK meeting is less important and just a parade, but for Americans that is a much more relevant geopolitical issue. Not to mention all our local stuff, which is always lat least 80% of news coverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gaza is a very small area. If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already.

They like to do it slowly through starvation. Play with the victims a bit.

Yup, they're just like the Nazi's but much more calculated in their methods.

They've already bombed enough of the hospitals and other life-supporting infrastructure that all they need to do block food in and let Gaza slowly starve to death rather than waste more American bombs. Starving a million plus people will generate less outrage than killing them quickly. That way they can have people like liberal Zionists say stupid stuff like "If Israel intended genocide there, it would be done already"

Boom - exactly!

GTFOH with the “Israel would do this or that if only they were not held back” horseshit. Those shitty, incompetent losers have the worst rate of killing innocent civilians in modern history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

DP
I don’t know, I consider it newsworthy that a one-sided conflict has spawned an endless wave of condemnation, which will rewrite how most of the world views many of the essential events that led to and occurred during WWII.

Quite newsworthy, I’d say. In fact, it seems inevitable that this “nothing burger” will have the greatest impact on resetting American politics in the past 250 years.

I know Zionists think this will all blow over and the halcyon days of living large will return. Wow, that’s a delusional misunderstanding of where we are now. The great grandchildren of Zionists will probably be paying off their portion of the debt that’s been created.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline

Not necessarily.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

DP
I don’t know, I consider it newsworthy that a one-sided conflict has spawned an endless wave of condemnation, which will rewrite how most of the world views many of the essential events that led to and occurred during WWII.

Quite newsworthy, I’d say. In fact, it seems inevitable that this “nothing burger” will have the greatest impact on resetting American politics in the past 250 years.

I know Zionists think this will all blow over and the halcyon days of living large will return. Wow, that’s a delusional misunderstanding of where we are now. The great grandchildren of Zionists will probably be paying off their portion of the debt that’s been created.

This is just really all your opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline

Not necessarily.

Why was it a headline when Hamas invaded /occupied Israel and committed massacres?

Part of the reason Hamas did that in the first place was to gain attention because nobody cares when Israelis occupy them . It’s only when they kill Israelis, that the world cares

[Anonymous]

If you want to destroy groups like Hamas, the best way to do it is to be fair and not have a double standard when it comes to Israeli life being more sacrosanct but you would to eliminate racism to do that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline

Not necessarily.

Why was it a headline when Hamas invaded /occupied Israel and committed massacres?

Part of the reason Hamas did that in the first place was to gain attention because nobody cares when Israelis occupy them . It’s only when they kill Israelis, that the world cares

No one has to care that Palestinians do not have their own country. And tellling us we must care day in and day out does not mean that people will begin to care.