Coverage of Gaza City Invasion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The “god promised us this land” has found ChatGPT. Lord help us! Lol

You are uttering this to yourself, meta-observations about a web forum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The “god promised us this land” has found ChatGPT. Lord help us! Lol

You are uttering this to yourself, meta-observations about a web forum?

What’s your feeling about the burning bush? Was it really talking to Moses, or was Moses delusional?

[Anonymous]

Hamas murders journalists who don’t promote their propaganda that you happen to also be promoting. You would be a good journalist in Gaza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy. After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point. There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes. The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed. Until then, there's nothing much new to report.

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline

Not necessarily.

Why was it a headline when Hamas invaded /occupied Israel and committed massacres?

Part of the reason Hamas did that in the first place was to gain attention because nobody cares when Israelis occupy them . It’s only when they kill Israelis, that the world cares

Are we supposed to be sympathetic to this?

Actions have consequences.

Why does the phrase “actions have consequences “ keep coming up? Does some right wing station keep repeating it? Should Israel be allowed to shoot down every man, woman and child in Gaza because “actions have consequences”? They will be coming on the third year of fighting. Israel will soon find out they crossed the line into genocide and causing a famine and their actions will have consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to paid for all this. When does the first check get delivered to Israel?

Number one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hamas murders journalists who don’t promote their propaganda that you happen to also be promoting. You would be a good journalist in Gaza.

Every accusation by Israel and zionists is a confession.

[Anonymous]

You need to look at foreign news sources
BBC has a news article about a high rise building that was demolished. It is reliable because IDF minister Katz posted it on X

They posted a news article showing satellite imagery too. So Israel has blocked out media, but can’t keep everything a secret