You wake up in bed next to one of the first five U.S. Presidents tomorrow morning …

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:George is my man.
He was tall and strong, apparently a great dancer and clearly had a take-charge attitude, so he might have been a decent lover.
Bonus: he was probably sterile, so no worries about an unwanted pregnancy.


he also had no teeth and used wooden dentures. That would be different.

That’s a myth. He had dentures, but they were not wooden.

https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/false-teeth
Anonymous
What if you woke up today from being in a coma for 4 years?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Theoretically John Adams, but I wouldn’t do that to Abigail. She deserves better



she was allegedly extremely dull


Who is alleging that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Theoretically John Adams, but I wouldn’t do that to Abigail. She deserves better



she was allegedly extremely dull


Who is alleging that?


Numerous biographers and historians.
Anonymous
Monroe. Soldier so had to be fit. Doesn’t look terrible.

Washington had fake teeth, Adams was chubby and dictatorial (look up Alien and Sedition Acts), Jefferson probably had a ton of STDs and Madison was super short and I’d be scared of Dolly.
Anonymous
Monroe. Look at that steely gaze.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They are all dead. FYI


Oh no, really?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Monroe. Look at that steely gaze.



Even better as a foxy young soldier.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Like Romeo and Juliet, it could be the romance between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings was probably genuine but was condemned by wider society at the time.

In that way, Jefferson was likely far ahead of his time, was a true believer that love is love unconditionally, and he was actually quite progressive.


I hope you're trolling. If you think that the romance between an over 40 year old man and a 14 year old slave child was some new age, ahead of it's time romance, you're being ridiculous at best. There's no period of time where that's acceptable. Much less so when the child is a captive threatened with being sold or killed if she refused him.


You have no way of knowing that .


Are you serious? Knowing what? That a 14 year old is in no way capable of being in love with a 43 year old man (and he was 43 when their first child was born), so who knows how long he was raping her before she got pregnant. Please stop - you're arguing the case of a pedophile.


This is why we can’t have fun threads. Also, Ben Franklin wasn’t a president.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Like Romeo and Juliet, it could be the romance between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings was probably genuine but was condemned by wider society at the time.

In that way, Jefferson was likely far ahead of his time, was a true believer that love is love unconditionally, and he was actually quite progressive.


I hope you're trolling. If you think that the romance between an over 40 year old man and a 14 year old slave child was some new age, ahead of it's time romance, you're being ridiculous at best. There's no period of time where that's acceptable. Much less so when the child is a captive threatened with being sold or killed if she refused him.


You have no way of knowing that .


Are you serious? Knowing what? That a 14 year old is in no way capable of being in love with a 43 year old man (and he was 43 when their first child was born), so who knows how long he was raping her before she got pregnant. Please stop - you're arguing the case of a pedophile.


This is why we can’t have fun threads. Also, Ben Franklin wasn’t a president.



No, he was not.

But he was a *PLAYAH* oh yeah!
Anonymous
I'm a big fan of both Dolly Madison and Abigail Adams. So I'd go with Madison and Adams as long as it was a threesome. I've never been in a threesome so I'm sure it would be historical.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thomas Jefferson.
Only choice, But this did cause me to google their heights which I had not know before (other than Jefferson)


Jefferson enslaved his kids with his slave girlfriend. Read the book Jefferson’s sons, a fictionalized account of his history, it made me nauseous.


Fictionalized is the key word


There's plenty of non-fiction books that point out the horror of a 40 year old man impregnating his 14 year old slave and making them work as slaves until he died.


I don’t like Jefferson and don’t think he was a good guy, but you’re not making the right case here. There’s no proof that his sexual relationship with Hemings started before she was 16, and while that’s young, it wasn’t weirdly young in the 18th century especially among the landed class. And she and her kids didn’t really work as slaves. The entire plantation was set up in a tiered system with the Hemings family in a privileged position. Sally lived as essentially a concubine and probably had more luxury than most married women of the era. She was herself 7/8 European in ancestry. Her children were educated and freed once they reached adult hood. (Freeing them as children might have chased some logistical/legal issues. I believe the ones that could not or did not pass a white left the state after emancipation to avoid the risks inherent to being a free black in the south.).
Also note Sally was essentially free in France and could have remained there. Also note that tsailly’s brother Marti no was the Butler at Monticello and protected the Jefferson property when the British marched through (Jefferson of course fled in advance of the British). It’s pretty certain he could have self emancipated by telling the British where Jefferson had gone, or even giving them the Jefferson silver which Martin had hidden, but his loyalty was to Jefferson.

My take on Jefferson is that he was a good looking, silver tongued, charismatic guy that a lot of people liked and as many people felt was kind of smarmy. He was idealistic in his youth but really really liked the finer things in life and his idealism crumbled in front of his desire to live a comfortable life with good wine and nice things and nice clothes. He got so in debt he was unable to free his slaves as he had said he would. He is one of the few founding fathers that saw no action in the revolutionary war, always retreating before the British arrived and managing to always maintain pretty comfortable circumstances while people like Washington were literally starving and freezing and seeing their friends fall to dust early, gangrene and gut wounds.

In short for purposes of this thread — Jefferson was probably a good one night stand but was not a good guy. Washington is a much better pick—but unclear if he has any game as he was not known as a lady’s man at all.
Anonymous
This site has pics of the presidents as younger men: https://hottestheadsofstate.com/young-us-presidents/

Excluding everything but looks and general knowledge about personality, I'm going to go with Jefferson among the first five.
But overall, I think Rutherford B. Hayes is my man. (There's a sentence I never thought I'd type.).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This site has pics of the presidents as younger men: https://hottestheadsofstate.com/young-us-presidents/

Excluding everything but looks and general knowledge about personality, I'm going to go with Jefferson among the first five.
But overall, I think Rutherford B. Hayes is my man. (There's a sentence I never thought I'd type.).


Rutherford B Hayes was sex on a stick as a young man
Anonymous
Ben Franklin.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: