Troops in LA can detain individuals, military official says

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Seriously. All those red state county Sheriffs know exactly where to find undocumented workers, but they give them sanctuary.

Yet we never hear the phrase "sanctuary farms".

Because farms don’t create laws or regulations? You people can’t be this dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

If the military shows up to a domestic protest then the military is the aggressor. If you show up with weapons and tactical gear to suppress the people then expect to have rocks thrown at you.

“I was afraid for my life” opens fire with an M27 on kids with rocks. That’s the country you want to live in?

[Anonymous]

Riot is NOT a protest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Riot is NOT a protest.

It's not a rebellion or insurrection or invasion, either. The Marines have no place there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

If the military shows up to a domestic protest then the military is the aggressor. If you show up with weapons and tactical gear to suppress the people then expect to have rocks thrown at you.

“I was afraid for my life” opens fire with an M27 on kids with rocks. That’s the country you want to live in?

No one would know the difference between a riot geared CHiP and a military member.

They have the same body armor, weapons etc.

People would really only notice an M1A1 tank just running over dozens or people or an Apache/Cobra gun ship strafing hundreds at a time. Which both platforms do, and do it very well. But they are not, just some marines backing up federal LEO because the state won’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

Um that’s not the military’s job, you get that, right? The state and mayor have the right to decide how to hand their local protestors. They didn’t ask for US military support. Remember ‘states rights’ blah blah? Or was that just a pretext?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

The US military is at war with over 1/2 of the US citizens. The US military is attacking peaceful protesters and other citizens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

If the military shows up to a domestic protest then the military is the aggressor. If you show up with weapons and tactical gear to suppress the people then expect to have rocks thrown at you.

“I was afraid for my life” opens fire with an M27 on kids with rocks. That’s the country you want to live in?

No one would know the difference between a riot geared CHiP and a military member.

They have the same body armor, weapons etc.

People would really only notice an M1A1 tank just running over dozens or people or an Apache/Cobra gun ship strafing hundreds at a time. Which both platforms do, and do it very well. But they are not, just some marines backing up federal LEO because the state won’t.

Authoritarians across the globe don’t use tanks to run over dozens of people. Even communist China doesn’t do that. They shoot into protest crowds and claim that they were just doing their job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

If the military shows up to a domestic protest then the military is the aggressor. If you show up with weapons and tactical gear to suppress the people then expect to have rocks thrown at you.

“I was afraid for my life” opens fire with an M27 on kids with rocks. That’s the country you want to live in?

No one would know the difference between a riot geared CHiP and a military member.

They have the same body armor, weapons etc.

People would really only notice an M1A1 tank just running over dozens or people or an Apache/Cobra gun ship strafing hundreds at a time. Which both platforms do, and do it very well. But they are not, just some marines backing up federal LEO because the state won’t.

No they are traitors to the US. Enemy of the enemy of the people. Never again will anyone say the US military kept us free. Thanks you for you oppression.

[Anonymous]

It’s already started. The US marines are arresting US citizens in LA. How long before the first kill?

Every office in these units needs to be prosecuted and stripped of their US citizenship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s already started. The US marines are arresting US citizens in LA. How long before the first kill?

Every office in these units needs to be prosecuted and stripped of their US citizenship.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

If the military shows up to a domestic protest then the military is the aggressor. If you show up with weapons and tactical gear to suppress the people then expect to have rocks thrown at you.

“I was afraid for my life” opens fire with an M27 on kids with rocks. That’s the country you want to live in?

No one would know the difference between a riot geared CHiP and a military member.

They have the same body armor, weapons etc.

People would really only notice an M1A1 tank just running over dozens or people or an Apache/Cobra gun ship strafing hundreds at a time. Which both platforms do, and do it very well. But they are not, just some marines backing up federal LEO because the state won’t.

Authoritarians across the globe don’t use tanks to run over dozens of people. Even communist China doesn’t do that. They shoot into protest crowds and claim that they were just doing their job.

Uh, Tiananmen square? One photo of a tank stopping does not mean the Chinese did not plow over hundreds with military vehicles.

Read a book or try using something called google.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

You do realize that throwing rocks at people can kill them, right?

But yes. You physically assault someone with intent to harm, expect to get got.

Throwing rocks is known to be very dangerous and can kill people. In some countries like Israel for example, you can be executed because of the risk.

[Anonymous]