Drink Milk at your own risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For anyone who says soy is dangerous, I urge you to question the “scientists” that deny climate change as well.

The facts are there: most of the continent of Asia has consumed soy for millennia with great health benefits, to the exact contrary of the claim.

There’s an entire industry selling factory farming and its abuse as natural. It’s not. And it’s worse for your health.

Fermented soybeans are healthy, and edamame. Soy milk is an ultra processed suspension of blended and filtered soybeans; often with flavorings and additives to mimic milk.

If you make your own soymilk with cheese cloth, probably that’s okay. But you still are missing the fiber that makes it so healthy.

[Anonymous]

Will any states step in and give their own testing and certification?

[Anonymous]

Aren’t Democrats going to be eating ze bugs pretty soon? No one needs milk after infancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will any states step in and give their own testing and certification?

Many already do. It's a regional thing.

Milk producers and distributors don't want scandals, as that hurts profits, which are razor thin already in the milk industry.

TLDR? It's safe. Stop worrying. Be more concerned about enviro-toxins and medications and processed foods.

[Anonymous]

60 minutes just had a segment on how serious Bird Flu is and that neither the Biden nor the current administrations were affording it the proper attention. So scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

Do we have reason to think that the USDA or FDA are testing these?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:60 minutes just had a segment on how serious Bird Flu is and that neither the Biden nor the current administrations were affording it the proper attention. So scary.

Especially when it's still being bio-enhanced in laboratories in Georgia and Wuhan. That bad strain "escaped" from a lab in Georgia months ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually, I agree that animals aren’t for human entertainment. But drinking cow milk is more cruel.

Eh, as someone who spent six years of her life hooked up to a milking machine multiple times a day, I just can’t get that worked up over it’s. And I think my udders are significantly more sensitive than theirs. But I buy farm milk from cows with a pretty good life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Aren’t Democrats going to be eating ze bugs pretty soon? No one needs milk after infancy.

No yogurt or cheese, either I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm changing from Fairlife (pasteurized and ultra-filtered) to Lactaid (ultra-pasteurized) for our lactose-intolerant household. 10 more cals per serving but better to be safe. The nut milks we use are already ultra-pasteurized.

The fact that you know how many more calories are in one than in the other is messed up. The fact that you posted that here is even more messed up. Normal people do not know that one milk has 10 more calories, nor do they pay attention to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great time to switch to soy. It’s actually very healthy and great tasting if you buy the unsweetened version.

The way cows are separated from their calfs for our milk obsession breaks my heart. That milk is for them, not for us!

You follow the Scientologist quack that even his own child denounced? This person is not a doctor, not anything, he is literally an idiot. And you follow the Berg idiot? What does that make you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm changing from Fairlife (pasteurized and ultra-filtered) to Lactaid (ultra-pasteurized) for our lactose-intolerant household. 10 more cals per serving but better to be safe. The nut milks we use are already ultra-pasteurized.

The fact that you know how many more calories are in one than in the other is messed up. The fact that you posted that here is even more messed up. Normal people do not know that one milk has 10 more calories, nor do they pay attention to it.

It took me all of five seconds to compare the Fairlife to the Lactaid at the store. Don't you read labels?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm changing from Fairlife (pasteurized and ultra-filtered) to Lactaid (ultra-pasteurized) for our lactose-intolerant household. 10 more cals per serving but better to be safe. The nut milks we use are already ultra-pasteurized.

The fact that you know how many more calories are in one than in the other is messed up. The fact that you posted that here is even more messed up. Normal people do not know that one milk has 10 more calories, nor do they pay attention to it.

It took me all of five seconds to compare the Fairlife to the Lactaid at the store. Don't you read labels?

Not for milk. Why would I read milk labels for calories? I don't have an eating disorder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

This should be tested too.

[Anonymous]

Oat milk is literally full of chemicals to make it taste anything tolerable. I can't believe someone thinks that is a healthier choice.