Sexualization of female athletes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

2/10. Try not to be so obvious that you're a cross-dressing male "trans woman" on a flight of fancy when you post your works of fiction.

You think conflicted male attraction to transwomen is fiction? Ever been to Thailand? Ever been to New York City? I’m not a cross-dresser, but I know why many men are. And it’s usually not “gender confusion.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

No. The voters will reward us for defending the human rights of migrants and trans folks. It’s our values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

2/10. Try not to be so obvious that you're a cross-dressing male "trans woman" on a flight of fancy when you post your works of fiction.

You think conflicted male attraction to transwomen is fiction? Ever been to Thailand? Ever been to New York City? I’m not a cross-dresser, but I know why many men are. And it’s usually not “gender confusion.”

Your father and husband's fetishes are none of my business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

No. The voters will reward us for defending the human rights of migrants and trans folks. It’s our values.

You just keep repeating that while we vote you out of relevance.

[Anonymous]

“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

No. The voters will reward us for defending the human rights of migrants and trans folks. It’s our values.

You just keep repeating that while we vote you out of relevance.

Lol. Has your leader mandated voter ID yet? Has he deported more illegal immigrants than Biden or Obama yet? Has he gotten a high approval rating yet? Yeah, I’m not too worried about Republicans winning future elections on a platform of trans hate. Trump’s mission appears to be the demolition of the Republican party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

[Anonymous]

The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

No. The voters will reward us for defending the human rights of migrants and trans folks. It’s our values.

You just keep repeating that while we vote you out of relevance.

Lol. Has your leader mandated voter ID yet? Has he deported more illegal immigrants than Biden or Obama yet? Has he gotten a high approval rating yet? Yeah, I’m not too worried about Republicans winning future elections on a platform of trans hate. Trump’s mission appears to be the demolition of the Republican party.

lol his approval ratings are in the high 40s which is historically high for this point in a presidency. Have you seen the ratings for the Democratic Party? 21 percent!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

It’s def responsible for Trump being in power now. At this rate, the Republicans will be winning for a long time.

No. The voters will reward us for defending the human rights of migrants and trans folks. It’s our values.

You literally just lost the presidential election with a “Kamala is for they/them ad.”

[Anonymous]

We’re not backing down. We will ignore Republican attack ads. 45 Senate Democrats just blocked the hateful ban on trans athletes. Some principles are more important than winning elections. I hate what Trump is doing as much as anyone. But I will NOT throw transwomen under the bus just to save my 401k.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

How so? It’s well-documented that many men are attracted to transwomen and it’s well-documented that many men are so confused and angry about this that they are hateful or even violent toward trans folks. There’s no way the minuscule number of trans athletes would have swayed an election without the intense emotions cisgendered men feel about the subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

How so? It’s well-documented that many men are attracted to transwomen and it’s well-documented that many men are so confused and angry about this that they are hateful or even violent toward trans folks. There’s no way the minuscule number of trans athletes would have swayed an election without the intense emotions cisgendered men feel about the subject.

No it’s not and a patently absurd argument.