Sexualization of female athletes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it was about sexy female athletes more men in the U.S. would watch women's sports. In fact, only girl dads watch women's sports. So are all girl dads creeps?

Largely, yes.

They go there to watch other men’s daughters, for the sexual thrill. You need only look at the design/fit/cut of the uniforms in women’s sports to know it’s about sexual titillation. Sportswear designed to reveal just enough, to highlight certain anatomy, yes it’s a real thing.

That’s why these men are so outraged at the idea of “men” competing on women’s teams - because they’re able to see the anatomical differences and features that differentiate women’s bodies from trans women’s bodies. Their homophobia causes them to feel shame, self loathing and disgust when they view a trans woman the same lustful way they ogled women.

That’s why they oppose trans women in women’s sports. Their own self conscious guilt.

So, men are pedophilic sex addicts whose actions are so consumed by their obsession with female bodies that even support for their own daughters is just a ruse to perv out on underage girls.

BUT

When these same men claim to be women, their claims have NOTHING to do with that predatory male sexuality that connives to prey on women. These men MUST be given access to intimate spaces where women and girls can be found naked and unsuspecting. Men who claim they are women are pure of heart and transformed by the redeeming power of female clothes and bad wigs. Other men who tell you that men who want access to women's spaces are the most untrustworthy of all cannot be believed, however. Men who admit they are men are bad.

Makes sense to me!

You are daft.

It is NOT the same men who are watching girl’s and women’s bodies in athletic clothing for the sexual pleasure of it, and other men who are women trapped in male bodies and become trans women. Those are two different and distinct groups.

Do you really not understand that?

Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.

So those “lesbian” trans women with cocks don’t find women attractive at all. Not one little bit.

So only trans women are allowed to be afraid of men, but us women need to tamp down millennia of prey drive of not wanting to be naked with a lesbian-fully-intact-trans woman.

Got it.

Do you self-identify as a TERF? Because that’s exactly what you are and it’s gross.

I am 1000% Team TERF. Thank you for asking!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it was about sexy female athletes more men in the U.S. would watch women's sports. In fact, only girl dads watch women's sports. So are all girl dads creeps?

Largely, yes.

They go there to watch other men’s daughters, for the sexual thrill. You need only look at the design/fit/cut of the uniforms in women’s sports to know it’s about sexual titillation. Sportswear designed to reveal just enough, to highlight certain anatomy, yes it’s a real thing.

That’s why these men are so outraged at the idea of “men” competing on women’s teams - because they’re able to see the anatomical differences and features that differentiate women’s bodies from trans women’s bodies. Their homophobia causes them to feel shame, self loathing and disgust when they view a trans woman the same lustful way they ogled women.

That’s why they oppose trans women in women’s sports. Their own self conscious guilt.

So, men are pedophilic sex addicts whose actions are so consumed by their obsession with female bodies that even support for their own daughters is just a ruse to perv out on underage girls.

BUT

When these same men claim to be women, their claims have NOTHING to do with that predatory male sexuality that connives to prey on women. These men MUST be given access to intimate spaces where women and girls can be found naked and unsuspecting. Men who claim they are women are pure of heart and transformed by the redeeming power of female clothes and bad wigs. Other men who tell you that men who want access to women's spaces are the most untrustworthy of all cannot be believed, however. Men who admit they are men are bad.

Makes sense to me!

You are daft.

It is NOT the same men who are watching girl’s and women’s bodies in athletic clothing for the sexual pleasure of it, and other men who are women trapped in male bodies and become trans women. Those are two different and distinct groups.

Do you really not understand that?

Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.

Serious question: How can you tell the difference between a trans woman who is interested in that thrill, and one who is not? More importantly, how can biological women entitled to be in that space tell the difference? Is the former not actually a trans woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it was about sexy female athletes more men in the U.S. would watch women's sports. In fact, only girl dads watch women's sports. So are all girl dads creeps?

Largely, yes.

They go there to watch other men’s daughters, for the sexual thrill. You need only look at the design/fit/cut of the uniforms in women’s sports to know it’s about sexual titillation. Sportswear designed to reveal just enough, to highlight certain anatomy, yes it’s a real thing.

That’s why these men are so outraged at the idea of “men” competing on women’s teams - because they’re able to see the anatomical differences and features that differentiate women’s bodies from trans women’s bodies. Their homophobia causes them to feel shame, self loathing and disgust when they view a trans woman the same lustful way they ogled women.

That’s why they oppose trans women in women’s sports. Their own self conscious guilt.

So, men are pedophilic sex addicts whose actions are so consumed by their obsession with female bodies that even support for their own daughters is just a ruse to perv out on underage girls.

BUT

When these same men claim to be women, their claims have NOTHING to do with that predatory male sexuality that connives to prey on women. These men MUST be given access to intimate spaces where women and girls can be found naked and unsuspecting. Men who claim they are women are pure of heart and transformed by the redeeming power of female clothes and bad wigs. Other men who tell you that men who want access to women's spaces are the most untrustworthy of all cannot be believed, however. Men who admit they are men are bad.

Makes sense to me!

You are daft.

It is NOT the same men who are watching girl’s and women’s bodies in athletic clothing for the sexual pleasure of it, and other men who are women trapped in male bodies and become trans women. Those are two different and distinct groups.

Do you really not understand that?

Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.

Serious question: How can you tell the difference between a trans woman who is interested in that thrill, and one who is not? More importantly, how can biological women entitled to be in that space tell the difference? Is the former not actually a trans woman?

You just have to wait and find out, honey. If he rapes you, then he's a man. If he "only" ogles your naked body, flashes his penis, waits until you're alone in the bathroom with him to stand uncomfortably close, intimidates you with his frame like a refrigerator and hands like catcher's mitts, or otherwise behaves just like a nasty, transgressive man allowed to perv on women, then he's a woman and you're a bigot.

Simple, see? Just let him in and hope for the best. You wouldn't want to hurt his feelings or suggest you're his equal by saying no to him now, would you?

[Anonymous]

How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

Soon, the answer will be zero, as it should have always been. No one cares who you claim to believe you are. Get your twig and berries to the men's team, you cheating interloper, and save your identity crisis for your therapist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Look liberals. Do. Not. Let. This. Issue. Destroy the party.

I think it already has.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only fair thing to do is have coed leagues.

Can’t let women have their own leagues! Heavens no.

[Anonymous]

Feminism and liberalism is wild. The party that is pretty anti-men and claims to be for women is now oppressing and pushing biological woman aside to fight for mentally ill men who think they’re women.

[Anonymous]

NP. It’s always so wild to read DCUM on this topic, which in the real world is a 90/10 (at best) topic. Such a crazy bubble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it was about sexy female athletes more men in the U.S. would watch women's sports. In fact, only girl dads watch women's sports. So are all girl dads creeps?

Largely, yes.

They go there to watch other men’s daughters, for the sexual thrill. You need only look at the design/fit/cut of the uniforms in women’s sports to know it’s about sexual titillation. Sportswear designed to reveal just enough, to highlight certain anatomy, yes it’s a real thing.

That’s why these men are so outraged at the idea of “men” competing on women’s teams - because they’re able to see the anatomical differences and features that differentiate women’s bodies from trans women’s bodies. Their homophobia causes them to feel shame, self loathing and disgust when they view a trans woman the same lustful way they ogled women.

That’s why they oppose trans women in women’s sports. Their own self conscious guilt.

So, men are pedophilic sex addicts whose actions are so consumed by their obsession with female bodies that even support for their own daughters is just a ruse to perv out on underage girls.

BUT

When these same men claim to be women, their claims have NOTHING to do with that predatory male sexuality that connives to prey on women. These men MUST be given access to intimate spaces where women and girls can be found naked and unsuspecting. Men who claim they are women are pure of heart and transformed by the redeeming power of female clothes and bad wigs. Other men who tell you that men who want access to women's spaces are the most untrustworthy of all cannot be believed, however. Men who admit they are men are bad.

Makes sense to me!

You are daft.

It is NOT the same men who are watching girl’s and women’s bodies in athletic clothing for the sexual pleasure of it, and other men who are women trapped in male bodies and become trans women. Those are two different and distinct groups.

Do you really not understand that?

Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.

So those “lesbian” trans women with cocks don’t find women attractive at all. Not one little bit.

So only trans women are allowed to be afraid of men, but us women need to tamp down millennia of prey drive of not wanting to be naked with a lesbian-fully-intact-trans woman.

Got it.

Do you self-identify as a TERF? Because that’s exactly what you are and it’s gross.

Do you self identify as a misogynist?

[Anonymous]

I unapologetically support the sexualization of women in sports. I think it's a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it was about sexy female athletes more men in the U.S. would watch women's sports. In fact, only girl dads watch women's sports. So are all girl dads creeps?

Largely, yes.

They go there to watch other men’s daughters, for the sexual thrill. You need only look at the design/fit/cut of the uniforms in women’s sports to know it’s about sexual titillation. Sportswear designed to reveal just enough, to highlight certain anatomy, yes it’s a real thing.

That’s why these men are so outraged at the idea of “men” competing on women’s teams - because they’re able to see the anatomical differences and features that differentiate women’s bodies from trans women’s bodies. Their homophobia causes them to feel shame, self loathing and disgust when they view a trans woman the same lustful way they ogled women.

That’s why they oppose trans women in women’s sports. Their own self conscious guilt.

If men truly loved women’s sports, they would embrace the bulge of anatomical difference instead of fearing it. Women can have male genitalia. Get over it!

[Anonymous]

The premise of this thread is gross. Women are more than sexual beings and can have a sincere interest in sports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

2/10. Try not to be so obvious that you're a cross-dressing male "trans woman" on a flight of fancy when you post your works of fiction.