How much longer til Hegseth gets fired/quits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He stoped the racism which is DEI.

Or are you democrats still supporting racism?

do you understand what racism is?

NP. I don't think they do. So, remember, folks:
The opposite of diversity is uniformity.
The opposite of equity is inequity (unfairness).
The opposite of inclusion is exclusion.

If you're in favor of uniformity, inequity, and exclusion, that suggests that you are a racist. Among other things. None of them good.

So good for Pete to put it this way. It brings a lot of clarity.

Also, white women still don’t understand that they were the biggest recipients of DEI, sadly for all of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He stoped the racism which is DEI.

Or are you democrats still supporting racism?

do you understand what racism is?

NP. I don't think they do. So, remember, folks:
The opposite of diversity is uniformity.
The opposite of equity is inequity (unfairness).
The opposite of inclusion is exclusion.

If you're in favor of uniformity, inequity, and exclusion, that suggests that you are a racist. Among other things. None of them good.

So good for Pete to put it this way. It brings a lot of clarity.

Also, white women still don’t understand that they were the biggest recipients of DEI, sadly for all of us.

Pete who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He stoped the racism which is DEI.

Or are you democrats still supporting racism?

do you understand what racism is?

NP. I don't think they do. So, remember, folks:
The opposite of diversity is uniformity.
The opposite of equity is inequity (unfairness).
The opposite of inclusion is exclusion.

If you're in favor of uniformity, inequity, and exclusion, that suggests that you are a racist. Among other things. None of them good.

So good for Pete to put it this way. It brings a lot of clarity.

Also, white women still don’t understand that they were the biggest recipients of DEI, sadly for all of us.

Pete who?

Definitely not pete Hegseth! Who wrote for the conservative newspaper mocking lgbt equality events. But I appreciate the PP’s sarcasm

[Anonymous]

Why you ripping on Peaty Pete this way? He's going through some difficult times at the moment. Have some human decency. The price of Scotch is going up 25% next week!

[Anonymous]

Will his brother get to hold on???
Hegseth’s younger brother is serving in a key role inside the Pentagon. His official title is senior adviser to the secretary for the Department of Homeland Security and liaison officer to the Defense Department. Based on Phil Hegseth’s publicly available resume, his past experience includes founding his own podcast production company, Embassy and Third, and working on social media and podcasts at The Hudson Institute.

Meritocracy!
https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/03/28/hegseths-younger-brother-is-serving-in-a-key-role-inside-the-pentagon/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he won't last as SecDef through 2025. The alcohol, the carelessness, the disregard for people with military backgrounds.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/27/hegseth-mistakes-some-trump-allies-00254817
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responds to questions from reporters.
Some administration insiders are starting to express doubts about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's judgment after he texted sensitive military information in a Signal chat. | Rod Lamkey, Jr./AP

By Jack Detsch, Paul McLeary and Eli Stokols

The White House is publicly defending Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after he texted sensitive military information in a Signal chat. But behind the scenes, administration insiders are starting to express doubts about the Pentagon chief’s judgment.

Officials agree national security adviser Mike Waltz, who accidentally invited a journalist to a group chat with senior leaders, could more easily take the fall for a scandal that has embarrassed the administration — which may end up sparing Hegseth his job.

But Republican hawks, Pentagon officials and even some inside the White House now believe Hegseth also messed up by sending likely classified details from his phone. And that has the potential to undermine his credibility in the administration.

Because Trump clearly likes and has publicly exonerated Hegseth, “you’re not going to hear a huge public outcry,” said a senior GOP official on Capitol Hill who is close to the White House. “But, privately, there is a lot of concern about his judgment, more than with Waltz.”

Even for a Pentagon chief who has copied Trump’s pugilistic style — down to his Sharpie signature and campaign-style videos — Hegseth’s growing pile of mistakes are getting noticed, according to four officials and two people in touch with the administration.

“The problem is this is another example of inexperience,” said a person close to the White House, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss a politically sensitive issue. “What happens when Hegseth needs to manage a real crisis?”

Why don't you ask those F asses who allowed to for this to go through? What an utter embarrassment of U.S. elected officials towards servicepeople and their families. Shame on every damn one of them who lead and voted in this hearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He stoped the racism which is DEI.

Or are you democrats still supporting racism?

do you understand what racism is?

NP. I don't think they do. So, remember, folks:
The opposite of diversity is uniformity.
The opposite of equity is inequity (unfairness).
The opposite of inclusion is exclusion.

If you're in favor of uniformity, inequity, and exclusion, that suggests that you are a racist. Among other things. None of them good.

So good for Pete to put it this way. It brings a lot of clarity.

Also, white women still don’t understand that they were the biggest recipients of DEI, sadly for all of us.

Pete who?

Definitely not pete Hegseth! Who wrote for the conservative newspaper mocking lgbt equality events. But I appreciate the PP’s sarcasm

LOL. That was me, and I didn’t register it was a DUI Pete thread I was posting on and should clarify. Statesman and leader Pete said that in an interview, which I assumed is where PP pulled it from (not that it’s not obvs).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will his brother get to hold on???
Hegseth’s younger brother is serving in a key role inside the Pentagon. His official title is senior adviser to the secretary for the Department of Homeland Security and liaison officer to the Defense Department. Based on Phil Hegseth’s publicly available resume, his past experience includes founding his own podcast production company, Embassy and Third, and working on social media and podcasts at The Hudson Institute.

Meritocracy!
https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/03/28/hegseths-younger-brother-is-serving-in-a-key-role-inside-the-pentagon/

Poster child for waste
Poster child for abuse
Poster child for DEI
And most importantly, Fraud’s Picture Perfect Poster

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He won’t be fired or quit. That would derail their plans to declare martial law on April 20 and deploy the military to the southern border

Why April 20? What's the significance of that date?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He won’t be fired or quit. That would derail their plans to declare martial law on April 20 and deploy the military to the southern border

Why April 20? What's the significance of that date?

420 yo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He won’t be fired or quit. That would derail their plans to declare martial law on April 20 and deploy the military to the southern border

Why April 20? What's the significance of that date?

Did you enjoy zee Fuhrers birthday party?

[Anonymous]

WSJ reporting he brought his wife to meetings with other military leaders where sensitive intelligence was shared.

Tick tock.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-brought-his-wife-to-sensitive-meetings-with-foreign-military-officials-c16db0ea?mod=mhp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ reporting he brought his wife to meetings with other military leaders where sensitive intelligence was shared.

Tick tock.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-brought-his-wife-to-sensitive-meetings-with-foreign-military-officials-c16db0ea?mod=mhp

Any chance of a gift link?

I listened to The Daily today, and I thought they had a pretty good take. The knives are out for Mike Waltz and Trump doesn't have a close relationship with Walz. The knives may also be out for Hegseth, but Trump has a close relationship with him. Walz will likely go down for this screwup. And firing Walz also has a secondary effect of shutting down (or slowing down) discussion on the fact that Hegseth 100% shared classified on that chat, and none of the other officials called it out.

That said, doing dumb crap like bringing your TV producer wife to high level meetings is only going to be tolerated for so long by lawmakers. Sen. Budd is already calling Hegseth's leadership into question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ reporting he brought his wife to meetings with other military leaders where sensitive intelligence was shared.

Tick tock.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-brought-his-wife-to-sensitive-meetings-with-foreign-military-officials-c16db0ea?mod=mhp

Any chance of a gift link?

I listened to The Daily today, and I thought they had a pretty good take. The knives are out for Mike Waltz and Trump doesn't have a close relationship with Walz. The knives may also be out for Hegseth, but Trump has a close relationship with him. Walz will likely go down for this screwup. And firing Walz also has a secondary effect of shutting down (or slowing down) discussion on the fact that Hegseth 100% shared classified on that chat, and none of the other officials called it out.

That said, doing dumb crap like bringing your TV producer wife to high level meetings is only going to be tolerated for so long by lawmakers. Sen. Budd is already calling Hegseth's leadership into question.

No gift link from me, alas. Happily offer those from the Post and the Times but do not subscribe. Apple News can’t stop won’t stop giving me these notifications though.

[Anonymous]

People like him don't quit. They just misbehave until they get fired.