+1 |
You are an example of many people who are loaded enough to effortlessly afford it, there are people way more loaded than you are who don't even have to work to give their kids the most expensive private education. But it's irrelevant to the OP, because she wouldn't be asking this question had money not being an issue. |
|
Private college is a luxury, simple as that. Prices rise because there are many people with money and competition is high and schools can charge it. I's a luxury product.
You already know the answer that going to a good state school is likely to give you the same result given all other variables (major, proactive job search and networking, etc) are the same. The only one factor that distinguishes $$$$ private schools from the state schools is larger pool or rich peers. If your kid is planning to capitalize on access to well-connected elites then it may be worth it, but there is zero guarantee this happens, it's a probability that's still rather small if you don't come from these circles already. If your kid is doing some special research or connected already with some professor/lab at one of these schools and it's their passion it also may be worth it, but still a luxury, and usually in that case you should expect some sort of FA or a scholarship. |
|
Let me help you in a different way.
The most important question to ask yourself for decision making is how you survive a less favorable outcome in both cases. How bitter and broke will you feel if your kid goes to a $$$$ school and can't support himself vs. if he pays a discounted rate for a state school and ends up unemployed. It's the loss dilemma. Like a risk calculation. Can you afford this risk like a family with tens of mil NW that would just wave it off financially even if disappointed? If your kid doesn't make it, then having extra savings become even more instrumental in helping him get up on his feet or go to a grad school. |
there is no such thing |
[url]
UVA isn't a huge state school like most of the other flagships. It has only 17,000 students. Also VA offers W&M which is an unusual SLAC-sized public |
| OP - my DD was in a similar situation. She chose UVA over the expensive private. We were (secretly) pleased because FAFSA/CSS said we weren't entitled to financial aid and she received no merit offers (she applied to Ivies and the top SLACs which don't offer merit). So we were full freight everywhere she was accepted. So she went to UVA and we banked the difference and let it compound. She distinguished herself at UVA and is now finishing her DPhil at Oxbridge and is applying to law schools now - where, again, she will receive no financial aid and most likely no merit - but we can afford the ridiculous law fees because that UVA savings has grown to cover the $116k a year that the T3s want. Even UVA, a public law school, is $106k a year. I do shake my head at these fees but it us what it is. Anyhow, UVA worked out very well for DD and this family. Best of luck. Oh and, if possible. have your daughter get nominated by her high school for the Jefferson Scholarship ... but it may already be too late for that. |
OP- my oldest was also a 2020 HS graduate and he was also accepted to northwestern and UMD honors with merit. We are fortunate and have savings and a good income and could have covered the costs at either school. We showed him the numbers on a spread sheet (one year at northwestern would equal 4 years at UMD) and offered him a new car if he went to UMD. He went to UMD started working at Big 4 consulting in October. I think his outcome was the same for 1/4 of the cost + $26k for a car. The further I am removed from college admissions, I think in most cases state schools can provide the same outcome for jobs at a fraction of the cost. |
| I went to Cornell in the late 80s and my dad cringed at the 10K tuition. There is enough money in our daughter's 529 to cover whatever school she wants to attend. A couple of the schools (WashU and NW) would basically wipeout her 529. We have recommended she consider all the factors in selecting a school, including the benefit of going to schools with significant merit aid. |
Why does state school mean unemployed as an outcome? |
You are aware of how insufferable you sound, right? |
Good plan. But it can be done before that. As long as you have targeted/saved for college (in 529 or otherwise), are also saving well for retirement (so that you can fund living to 95 and afford 4-5 years in advanced care), I think you can still be working. I would also want to be on track to have a paid off home by 55, if not sooner. IMO the key is targeted savings for college and being well set otherwise. |
Or just someone who also targeted saving for college from time kids were little. I know plenty of people who only make $250-300K who manage to save for 90K college (and are not going into debt)---they simply chose to save and make education a priority. Think about it. If you were living on $125-150K at one time, then incomes went up to $250K, you can choose to save at least 50% of that for college and bingo you will be set. I do get that the other 50% likely went to retirement savings and other items. But fact is, many people choose not to save--and that's okay, but don't claim you couldn't have saved if you wanted to |
That's still a large school. My kids targeted schools with 5-8K undergrads. They both knew they would do better at a school that size. Their HS was 2600, so they also knew they wanted more than 1-2K students (and one wanted engineering so that size was out anyhow for the major). Sure my kid could attend a large school and "survive" but they will thrive more easily at a 5-8K school. And if your kid is "qualified" for a T25, they can easily go to the 30-75 range and get good merit. my top kid did that at several schools--including one around 50 that gave $42K/year merit. So yearly cost would be $45K---not that much more than the 27-28K for state schools. |
|
I don’t understand folks who say “money isn’t an issue for us” when it comes to paying for private college. Are they saying that money isn’t an issue for them for ANYTHING, anything relating to their kids, or anything relating to their kids’ education? If it’s the first, that’s great, good for you, but there are very, very few of you out there. If it’s the second, well, congratulations on spoiling your children. But if it’s the third, why shouldn’t cost matter to when it comes to college? Why pay more - sometimes much more - for this one particular item in the absence of any evidence of any tangle difference in outcome?
Posters will respond that it's all about "fit," and that their kids deserve to go anywhere they want to college, but why is that the case? Why is it so difficult for parents to understand that it's not a marriage - it's college - and fitting into a glass slipper is not a requirement? this way of thinking is coddling to the extreme. |