Bowser seems have a high opinion of herself and her position if she thinks that she can get a meeting with the President. Maybe she can meet the President if he’s hosting a room full of 20 other big city mayors. The closest that she’s going to get to meeting the President is probably going to be a meeting with the Deputy Chief of Staff, which is Stephen Miller. I hope she enjoys that lesson in humility. |
+1 most of the federal employees they are targeting can't afford to live in DC. They already live in Virginia. |
That was a good move. It's obviously not about actually getting a meeting (and she probably doesn't want one). |
Not really. People who live in VA and work in DC pay VA taxes already, not DC taxes. |
You don't actually know where federal employees are, do you? |
That's in Maryland. |
I don’t disagree that it is obviously calculated, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t look silly. What is she going to do next? Demand meetings with foreign leaders? She can make all of the ludicrous demands that she wants, she’s bring to get ignored. She semis to inexplicably have an ego to match Trumps. |
| If I were Trump, I'd agree to Bowser's RTO request but only on the condition that she and the council enact legislation ceding control of all aspects of DC's criminal justice system. |
The Federal Government has the power to do that unilaterally by amending the home rule act. Don’t need DC to do anything. |
It’s just protocol. Like other leaders, she formally requests a meeting with the POTUS. It’s a sign of respect for the office of the President. She’s signaling to DJT’s camp that she’s willing to play ball. It has nothing to do with thinking highly of herself. |
| There's no way I'd agreed to anything that Bowser wants without getting something big in return. |
Things Bowser wants: football stadium, FBI HQ staying in DC, RTO for Feds, and more residential construction/CRE conversion. Maybe even convincing Republicans to raise the height limit. Definitely fix the USAO's office. She's speaking Trump's language. The other thing she wants: don't mess with Home Rule. But she's not going to bring up that topic. Better to distract Trump with big development projects and a bustling, clean city. |
| How does RTO for feds appreciably increase DC revenue? WMATA is doing ok. Most federal offices are owned by feds so I don’t think they pay DC taxes. Is it just downtown retail she’s concerned with? |
+1 She really has nothing to lose. |
"Just downtown retail" You get that DC is a major city, right? People spending money in the city on food, entertainment, transportation, and consumer goods is a huge part of the revenue base. It's not like we make our money off of local factories. Yes property taxes play a big role too and federal properties don't pay that. But the trade off is bring thousands of people into the city every single day who will spend money. RTO doesn't just mean more sandwich shops for lunch and retail in the downtown core dues better. It means boosting restaurants and bars across the city even in the evening as workers who come into the city are more likely to go out in the city after work. This also helps event planners, caterers, and entertainment venues. Yes it helps retail. But the bigger point is that it provides a population of consumers in the city 5 days a week and gives the city lots of opportunities to capture their interest and money. Someone working 9-5 in the city is more likely to head to a Nats game after work, plus grab dinner and drinks in Navy Yard and maybe stop in the team store and buy a cap. With WFH that worker might decide the commute into the city isn't worth it, watch the game in TV, order take out from a nearby restaurant in VA, and order that cap online-- DC gets nothing. Federal RTO would be a huge boon to DC's economy and accelerate the existing shift towards RTO for law, consulting, and lobbying firms as well as other white collar jobs that bring plenty of consumer dollars with them. |