Why do you insist on comparing apples to oranges? No one is saying that women should have the SAME athletic capabilities as men (with the notable exception of the current liberal insanity). Men and women are fundamentally DIFFERENT. So when you’re comparing “fitness” with your husband or your teenage son you need to compare *relative* fitness, i.e. against people who are your own sex and your own age. My 14 year old son also has more muscle mass than me, can lift heavier, jump higher, run faster, and has much greater endurance. That’s GOOD. That’s NATURAL. If a 14 year old boy can’t beat his middle aged mom arm wrestling then something is wrong (unless he hasn’t started puberty yet, of course). It is mind-boggling that this is not obvious to people. And to echo what some other PP’s have pointed out - OP it is NOT easy for your DH. It sounds like he’s actually working his butt off, while you do the bare minimum but expect similar results. |
Women also have the tremendous advantage that they can be healthier at much higher body fat % than men.
All of these stupid arguments about men having it easier because they can inherently lift more weight due to biological strength miss the point. Yeah well the highest acceptable body fat % for men is 24% while it is 31% for women. Men have to work out a TON more because they need much lower body fat % than women for health. It's arguably much harder for men to be in adequate shape compared to women simply because men are required to have much lower fat to be healthy. |
Men need to be under 12% body fat to see their abs and women can see them as early as under 20%.
Less than 10% of the US male population has visible abs, although every human has the muscles. Lower for women. Mainly because if you want to have kids being fertile at that low body fat hurts your chances. If it were easy, anyone who wanted to could have a 6 pack. It just is not that easy, for either sex. |