Purdue Discrimination Case: Professor says "whites are lazy" and "just hire Chinese students."

[Anonymous]

Purdue is like comedy Central.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/23/us/purdue-university-chancellor-racist-remarks-reaj/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Purdue would go to trial rather than settle based on some pretty clear cut comments (imagine if they'd said that about blacks). I guess the administration agrees with the sentiment.

which should tell you there is no valid case

Because there isnt'. Why don't you fools realize that the media plays on the plaintiff's side of these cases? And often there Is "no there there" because anyone can sue in America but few cases ever make it to trial or judgment. grow up and learn before you poist such junk again

Do you think plaintiffs and their lawyers like spending a fortune on loser cases?

The plaintiff already lost 2/3 of her case. The only check n balance to a frivolous lawsuit is if she has to pay for her losing effort.

What are the 2/3 she lost?

I assume PP is not familiar with how civil suits work and is trying to apply some kind of arbitrary math to the summary judgment order. It looks like the court dismissed one of the named defendants and one of the claims against Purdue. The heart of the case survived summary judgment and is headed to trial. The decision likely didn't reduce the potential civil damages available to Plaintiff by much if any.

[Anonymous]

Not a lot of new information, but the Purdue Exponent has an update on Monday's trial proceedings:
https://www.purdueexponent.org/campus/article_27763150-b97d-11ee-abfc-2b5df9d08150.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Purdue would go to trial rather than settle based on some pretty clear cut comments (imagine if they'd said that about blacks). I guess the administration agrees with the sentiment.

which should tell you there is no valid case

Because there isnt'. Why don't you fools realize that the media plays on the plaintiff's side of these cases? And often there Is "no there there" because anyone can sue in America but few cases ever make it to trial or judgment. grow up and learn before you poist such junk again

Do you think plaintiffs and their lawyers like spending a fortune on loser cases?

The plaintiff already lost 2/3 of her case. The only check n balance to a frivolous lawsuit is if she has to pay for her losing effort.

What are the 2/3 she lost?

I assume PP is not familiar with how civil suits work and is trying to apply some kind of arbitrary math to the summary judgment order. It looks like the court dismissed one of the named defendants and one of the claims against Purdue. The heart of the case survived summary judgment and is headed to trial. The decision likely didn't reduce the potential civil damages available to Plaintiff by much if any.

PP sounds like an unemployed lawyer giving out free legal advice on DUUM. Free legal advice is free cuz you get what you pay for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"

---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.

US Legal System has entered the chat.

If he believes that, not very smart to bait the US legal system.

[Anonymous]

This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

Sounds like you're worried about this. If there is nothing to her claims then justice will be served. Let her have her day in court, and see what happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

You're trolling, right? Hoping for an emotional response because you called the plaintiff "this girl."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about a kid that 50% white and 50% Chinese?

You'll have to ask Ishii.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

\

So, if someone discriminates against you, just let them have their way and go somewhere else? That's not how this works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

\

So, if someone discriminates against you, just let them have their way and go somewhere else? That's not how this works.

Let's wait and see if the court agrees she should be a tenured prof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

\

So, if someone discriminates against you, just let them have their way and go somewhere else? That's not how this works.

Let's wait and see if the court agrees she should be a tenured prof.

This is a jury decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about a kid that 50% white and 50% Chinese?

Part time lazy, obviously

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This girl is asking for the court to reinstate her as the the tenured prof at Purdue. If she were this good, she should be able to find a tenured job elsewhere. $o, $omething i$ not right about this law$uit.

\

So, if someone discriminates against you, just let them have their way and go somewhere else? That's not how this works.

Let's wait and see if the court agrees she should be a tenured prof.

This is a jury decision.

When was the last court case where a jury played the HR role in promoting someone to a tenure job? Not going to happen this time.

[Anonymous]

With this much controversy I doubt she would want to work in that environment anyway.