Whoa FCPS- data breach

[Anonymous]

Callie lives for these breaches. It's her bread and butter.

[Anonymous]

She's slandering FCPS. You are slandering her with something completely off topic to the data breach. Do you not see the similarity that you both possess?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's slandering FCPS. You are slandering her with something completely off topic to the data breach. Do you not see the similarity that you both possess?

DP. Oettinger is an advocate and posted the data as part of her advocacy. The anonymous teacher noted that her advocacy is combative but didn't say how effective or ineffective it was.

[Anonymous]

Correct. She's an advocate and did this work as part of her advocacy. Special needs parents should appreciate that they know how careless FCPS is with their data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Correct. She's an advocate and did this work as part of her advocacy. Special needs parents should appreciate that they know how careless FCPS is with their data.

Yeah no. There's nothing "advocate" about her actions.

[Anonymous]

Disagree. FCPS is careless with these records and needs to fix this problem ASAP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disagree. FCPS is careless with these records and needs to fix this problem ASAP.

No one disagrees with this. But two wrongs don't make a right and her choice to not inform the district that she was accidentally given the records, and then publish them herself, is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh. While I sympathize, this woman has wreaked operational havoc on the schools her children have attended. I know one AP who spent her summer dealing with document requests from her instead of working on things that were needed to open school in the fall.

She was an "advocate" for one of the students in my lower ES class. She and the mom of the child were nasty from the second we sat down in an initial meeting. I typically walk into a meeting and present a pleasant greeting and small talk. Neither would make eye contact, let alone smile. They interrupted and they looked for any opportunity to find a "gotcha" moment. I remember trying to point out some positives about the child's academic work and they didn't want to hear it. It was all very negative and stressful when all I wanted to do was work with the parent in support of the child.

Nobody owes you pleasantries especially during a stressful time. Your focus once you walk in that room should be identifying problems and solutions to help that child. The parent (or child if they are present) should be the lead voice of the meeting, if they find it necessary to interrupt anyone then so be it. Sounds like you weren’t being helpful and they were trying to best utilize the time and keep the focus on identifying concerns and solutions. An advocate is there to help advocate for the child/parent and step in when they need to keep the focus on problems and solutions, it sounds like they did that. If something offended you then you should use it as a learning experience for how to conduct yourself differently next time. A productive IEP will skew negative and stressful in general, so you might need to change your expectations. I hope you keep the bad mouthing of other advocates and parents to yourself though, it’s really not a good look for a teacher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And clearly you are not the nicey nice person you think you are if you are coming here to slander.

NP - I have no idea what you are trying to say here, even beyond the baby-talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And clearly you are not the nicey nice person you think you are if you are coming here to slander.

NP - I have no idea what you are trying to say here, even beyond the baby-talk.

I'm saying she is blind to her own combativeness which is passive aggressive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And clearly you are not the nicey nice person you think you are if you are coming here to slander.

NP - I have no idea what you are trying to say here, even beyond the baby-talk.

I'm saying she is blind to her own combativeness which is passive aggressive

DP. Did you hear that in therapy? Because there may be situations where that is applicable but not here.

[Anonymous]

What do you mean? Passive aggressiveness is a communication behavior pattern just like combativeness. If we can point out that this advocate is combative we can point out that this teacher is passive agressive. This discussion is about a data breach. Why did this teacher not come on here unless to undermine the importance of her work uncovering FCPS's ineptitude?

[Anonymous]

Next time maybe she will stand her ground and tell the parents and advocates in a combative voice back that she wants to work together with them but can't if the atmosphere is combative. Maybe she can expect these meetings to be more businesslike. Then she won't feel the need to slander someone anonymously when they obviously picked up on an egregious error that needs to be corrected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Next time maybe she will stand her ground and tell the parents and advocates in a combative voice back that she wants to work together with them but can't if the atmosphere is combative. Maybe she can expect these meetings to be more businesslike. Then she won't feel the need to slander someone anonymously when they obviously picked up on an egregious error that needs to be corrected.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

I personally would prefer for Callie to actually advocate on behalf of kids with IEPs. Instead, she just uses those kids to expose FCPS. She's useless.