Ugh street walkers are back in Logan Circle

[Anonymous]

I don’t think prostitution ever declined, I think this is just about things going online and then off again because of policies about Craigslist etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They wouldn't be there if there weren't plenty of customers.

"Ugh johns are back in Logan Circle" is something OP could have said, yet didn't.

+100

OP always blaming the women.

Women have the brains to make wise choices, right? Or are you suggesting they can't think for themselves and have to do others' bidding?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
usually thats a different category of prostitute/john

Just your typical DC woman

[Anonymous]

Doesn't DC only prosecute the Johns due to equity? Probably less risky to buy off the street rather than create a permanent record on Craigslist or wherever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Had a late dinner last night in Logan and prostitutes were literally walking the street on 13th. A pair of them came up to our Uber’s window.

Wtf! The city had done such a good job cleaning up this area and at the very least moving this off the street. Tbh, I don’t go out much these days for late dinners, but this feels like bad slippage by the city.

Has it been like this for a while? These women were literally half naked. I had not seen this in years.

You sure it wasn't just homecoming dance night at the local high school?



*don't flame me--that was a JOKE people!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They wouldn't be there if there weren't plenty of customers.

"Ugh johns are back in Logan Circle" is something OP could have said, yet didn't.

Why would johns be back if there weren’t prostitutes already there and offering their services?

Do you understand how that works? The johns don’t show up someplace unless there’s a reason to. They follow the prostitutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think prostitution ever declined, I think this is just about things going online and then off again because of policies about Craigslist etc.

This.

[Anonymous]

If you’re allowed to smoke weed, why can’t I buy a prostitute? What business of it is yours what two consenting adults do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you’re allowed to smoke weed, why can’t I buy a prostitute? What business of it is yours what two consenting adults do?

You can't buy people.

You can buy services sold by people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They wouldn't be there if there weren't plenty of customers.

"Ugh johns are back in Logan Circle" is something OP could have said, yet didn't.

Why would johns be back if there weren’t prostitutes already there and offering their services?

Do you understand how that works? The johns don’t show up someplace unless there’s a reason to. They follow the prostitutes.

Why would people sell their services there if there weren't people who are willing to buy their services there? Do you understand how that works? The vendors don't show up some place unless there's a reason to (i.e., there are customers there).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re allowed to smoke weed, why can’t I buy a prostitute? What business of it is yours what two consenting adults do?

You can't buy people.

You can buy services sold by people.

Stop playing stupid semantic games. You know what the intended message was. What’s the problems with hiring a prostitute? You let people smoke weed. What’s the difference?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was common in the 90s. But given how short some dresses/shorts are now I’m not sure I’d know if someone was a prostitute. The butt cheeks hanging out along with boobs pulling out the top used to be the sign but I feel like I’m see other people wearing that now. I guess if they actually ask for money for sex, that’s the way to kmow.

+1 Too many women of all ages today are dressing like the lowest common denominator -- as tacky and revealing as possible.

You are tacky and poorly bred. What lowest common denominator do they share with your mother and your daughter?

[Anonymous]

It's by the Comfort Inn on 13th. I don't think that place ever stopped being a hotbed for prostitution. Pretty sure they don't care how many guys someone brings up and it's relatively cheap for the area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re allowed to smoke weed, why can’t I buy a prostitute? What business of it is yours what two consenting adults do?

You can't buy people.

You can buy services sold by people.

Shouldn't we refer to them as "enprostituted persons" now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They wouldn't be there if there weren't plenty of customers.

"Ugh johns are back in Logan Circle" is something OP could have said, yet didn't.

Why would johns be back if there weren’t prostitutes already there and offering their services?

Do you understand how that works? The johns don’t show up someplace unless there’s a reason to. They follow the prostitutes.

Why would people sell their services there if there weren't people who are willing to buy their services there? Do you understand how that works? The vendors don't show up some place unless there's a reason to (i.e., there are customers there).

That’s as idiotic as suggesting that businesses built stores in vacant fields because they saw shoppers constantly gathering there for no reason back before the store existed.