Another priest arrested

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile apologists are gross... just stop, please.

Some of us have personal reasons to be concerned about pedophelia. That’s precisely why we believe your behavior is so damaging: you’re identifying yourself as a bigot and, by doing so, you’re making everything about yourself and your bigotry instead of about the pedophelia.

Perhaps you don’t want news like this to be overshadowed by people’s’ perceptions that you’re an attention-seeking bigot. If you’re sincere, you’d start weekly posts in DCUM’s schools fora about the latest pedophile teachers in Des Moines and Syracuse. Without that, we understand that you’re just a run-of-the-mill bigot who uses news like this to stir up online attention to yourself.

Oh yeah you’re SO concerned about protecting children that you think nobody can say anything about a Catholic priest unless they also include a link about a Jew, Muslim and teacher abuse case. GTFO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

Of course but it is done in the school forum.

You think a teacher molests somebody and it doesn't make it in the paper and is not discussed on DCUM?

Are you daft?

About local schools. Not about schools in Syracuse and across the country.

Are you daft?

You’re soooooo defensive. Why is that?

There is no rule requiring all predatory crimes discussed to be local. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

[Anonymous]

The problem here is that abuse in the Catholic Church is systemic. It runs far and wide and has negatively impacted thousands of people. For decades Church leaders suppressed the abuse and protected pedophiles, making an already terrible situation even worse. There is no comparable level of institutional and systemic abuse than what occurred (and what is still occurring) in the Catholic Church. Attempting somehow to equalize abuse in the Catholic Church with individual pedophiles or cases of abuse found in other religious/denominational settings (which are terrible in their own right) is disingenuous and a deflection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem here is that abuse in the Catholic Church is systemic. It runs far and wide and has negatively impacted thousands of people. For decades Church leaders suppressed the abuse and protected pedophiles, making an already terrible situation even worse. There is no comparable level of institutional and systemic abuse than what occurred (and what is still occurring) in the Catholic Church. Attempting somehow to equalize abuse in the Catholic Church with individual pedophiles or cases of abuse found in other religious/denominational settings (which are terrible in their own right) is disingenuous and a deflection.

You know very well there are systemic abuse and coverups in other religions and institutions. To claim otherwise is disengenuous and a deflection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

Oh give it up. There is NO “straight up bigotry” here unless you think the mere mention of a pedophile priest is bigoted. Go back and read the thread. OP posted the link, and then immediately the apologists started accusing OP of being anti-Catholic. Literally that is what happened - some people want to use false claimes of bigotry to shut up any discussion of Catholic abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile apologists are gross... just stop, please.

Some of us have personal reasons to be concerned about pedophelia. That’s precisely why we believe your behavior is so damaging: you’re identifying yourself as a bigot and, by doing so, you’re making everything about yourself and your bigotry instead of about the pedophelia.

Perhaps you don’t want news like this to be overshadowed by people’s’ perceptions that you’re an attention-seeking bigot. If you’re sincere, you’d start weekly posts in DCUM’s schools fora about the latest pedophile teachers in Des Moines and Syracuse. Without that, we understand that you’re just a run-of-the-mill bigot who uses news like this to stir up online attention to yourself.

Oh yeah you’re SO concerned about protecting children that you think nobody can say anything about a Catholic priest unless they also include a link about a Jew, Muslim and teacher abuse case. GTFO.

That’s actually the whole point. By associating pedophelia with your anti-Catholic prejudice, you make it about your personal bigotry and deflect attention from the actual problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem here is that abuse in the Catholic Church is systemic. It runs far and wide and has negatively impacted thousands of people. For decades Church leaders suppressed the abuse and protected pedophiles, making an already terrible situation even worse. There is no comparable level of institutional and systemic abuse than what occurred (and what is still occurring) in the Catholic Church. Attempting somehow to equalize abuse in the Catholic Church with individual pedophiles or cases of abuse found in other religious/denominational settings (which are terrible in their own right) is disingenuous and a deflection.

Exactly. And the only response of the apologists is to somehow claim that the fact that abuse exists outside the Church means that the Church should be excused. I actually agree that all institutions that allow access to minors/vulnerable people will attract abuser. But the Catholic Church has to be held accountable for its well-documented protection of the abusers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile apologists are gross... just stop, please.

Some of us have personal reasons to be concerned about pedophelia. That’s precisely why we believe your behavior is so damaging: you’re identifying yourself as a bigot and, by doing so, you’re making everything about yourself and your bigotry instead of about the pedophelia.

Perhaps you don’t want news like this to be overshadowed by people’s’ perceptions that you’re an attention-seeking bigot. If you’re sincere, you’d start weekly posts in DCUM’s schools fora about the latest pedophile teachers in Des Moines and Syracuse. Without that, we understand that you’re just a run-of-the-mill bigot who uses news like this to stir up online attention to yourself.

Oh yeah you’re SO concerned about protecting children that you think nobody can say anything about a Catholic priest unless they also include a link about a Jew, Muslim and teacher abuse case. GTFO.

That’s actually the whole point. By associating pedophelia with your anti-Catholic prejudice, you make it about your personal bigotry and deflect attention from the actual problem.

where is the anti-Catholic prejudice in this post? it started out with the link and then the accusations of bigotry began to fly. again - the accusations of bigotry stemmed from OP posting that a priest was arrested, nothing more! So your claim seems to be that the *mere mention* of Catholic abuse is bigoted. Your agenda is transparent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

Oh give it up. There is NO “straight up bigotry” here unless you think the mere mention of a pedophile priest is bigoted. Go back and read the thread. OP posted the link, and then immediately the apologists started accusing OP of being anti-Catholic. Literally that is what happened - some people want to use false claimes of bigotry to shut up any discussion of Catholic abuse.

It’s the pattern of behavior going back years in this forum. So many people, including on this thread, have pointed this pattern out. You pretending it doesn’t exist won’t make the long pattern of bigotry go away.

You actually care about pedophelia, instead of just scoring points against Catholics? Then grow up and own your behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

Oh give it up. There is NO “straight up bigotry” here unless you think the mere mention of a pedophile priest is bigoted. Go back and read the thread. OP posted the link, and then immediately the apologists started accusing OP of being anti-Catholic. Literally that is what happened - some people want to use false claimes of bigotry to shut up any discussion of Catholic abuse.

It’s the pattern of behavior going back years in this forum. So many people, including on this thread, have pointed this pattern out. You pretending it doesn’t exist won’t make the long pattern of bigotry go away.

You actually care about pedophelia, instead of just scoring points against Catholics? Then grow up and own your behavior.

There is no such pattern of behavior. DCUM always has posts on child abuse in the news - many threads on the Washington Hebrew Congregation, LAMB, etc. It’s only in your twisted mind that any mention of Catholic abuse is bigoted. Seriously step back and think about what you are trying to claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

Oh give it up. There is NO “straight up bigotry” here unless you think the mere mention of a pedophile priest is bigoted. Go back and read the thread. OP posted the link, and then immediately the apologists started accusing OP of being anti-Catholic. Literally that is what happened - some people want to use false claimes of bigotry to shut up any discussion of Catholic abuse.

It’s the pattern of behavior going back years in this forum. So many people, including on this thread, have pointed this pattern out. You pretending it doesn’t exist won’t make the long pattern of bigotry go away.

You actually care about pedophelia, instead of just scoring points against Catholics? Then grow up and own your behavior.

There is no such pattern of behavior. DCUM always has posts on child abuse in the news - many threads on the Washington Hebrew Congregation, LAMB, etc. It’s only in your twisted mind that any mention of Catholic abuse is bigoted. Seriously step back and think about what you are trying to claim.

You know you’re lying, we know you’re lying.

It’s like a ritual on DCUM: comb the national news to find a priest in Syracuse, and make your weekly post about it. How long ago were the posts about local orgs like LAMB and Washington Hebrew? Where are the threads about schools and other religions in Syracuse?

If you care about pedophelia, stop linking it in everybody’s minds to your own bigotry.

[Anonymous]

“ Even after McCormack’s first arrest in 2005 for sexual abuse, the Chicago archdiocese did not remove him from the ministry since those charges were dropped for a lack of evidence, the report says. An archdiocese review board recommended McCormack’s removal that year, but then-Cardinal Francis George declined”

This kind of behavior by the Catholic Church is not swiftly forgotten or remedied on an institutional level. It’s clear that the Church’s MO to protect/silence and put its reputation above protecting the vulnerable is deeply rooted - and apparent in those on this very thread trying to silence discharge with false accusations of bigotry.

https://apnews.com/article/catholic-clergy-sexual-abuse-illinois-investigation-a298133cec9486c2e51172316bfe7b4b

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not Catholic. I do think this is awful. But I also wonder if you’re equally as obsessive on the school and Family fora, or whether you bother to report on leaders from other faiths, every time there’s a news report about molestation.

This. The media and liberals seem to have an obsession with Catholics that do wrong. Protestants, Muslims, Jews - they all get a pass.

No, there’s plenty of coverage when an evangelical pastor is busted for gay s*x.

The media/popular attention is due to the fact that these guys are massive hypocrites. Trying to exert control over other people’s sexuality and reproduction, including through political influence, and meanwhile engaged in the most rank personal conduct. As for Catholics, there is plenty of evidence that the Catholic Church specifically has an abuse problem caused by the celibacy requirement and the type of people who are attracted to that, plus access to minors, and a culture of covering up abuse.

Kindly cite the “evidence” you claim allegedly linking celibacy to a propensity to commit sexual abuse.

As for “the type of people attracted to that,” people who engage in sexual activity with minors, or with anyone, by definition are not celibate.

The rate of sexual abuse by educators, police, foster parents, prison personnel, scouting and coaching personnel, and non-Catholic clergy vastly exceeds anything even alleged, let alone proven at any time against clergy in the Catholic Church. The rate in schools is estimated to be at least 100x that alleged against the Church. The vast majority of the persons committing such abuse are married/non-celibate.

Kindly cite the "evidence" for your assertion that non-catholic clergy abuse at a higher rate than catholic clergy

The assertion about non-Catholic educators is something that's kicking around hard-right, Christian nationalist circles. When they bother to cite any evidence, they all link back to a Pennsylvania state government cite that misquotes a Department of Education meta-analysis of studies of sexual abuse AND MISCONDUCT. Some important notes about this:

- The DOE analysis includes public and private schools, and several of the incidents of misconduct cited are specifically Catholic clergy abusing children.
- The meta-analysis includes "misconduct", including, e.g., adult school employees saying inappropriate things (e.g. a dirty joke) unknowingly within the hearing of a student. If that's reported, it's included as sexual misconduct.

Of course, all sexual abuse and misconduct by anyone should be investigated and reported, but trying to use an analysis that includes both rape by priests as well as one adult making an inappropriate comment to another adult to claim that other organizations are as bad as the Catholic church, which as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels actively covered up priests raping children in their care, is very disingenuous.

People on this board claim anti-Catholic bias whenever this topic comes up, but the facts are what they are -- the church actively covered up abuse for at least 60 years, and leadership actively participated. For people like me who had no particular opinion about the Catholic church before learning about this, I'm baffled at folks defending this atrocity.

Where is the defense? I missed it.

you missed the guy claiming that the Catholic Church has a sterling child protection record and anyone claiming otherwise is just a guilty sinner?

Yep missed that one and all the other "folks" defending it. Struggling to find a single defense here. It's outrageous when a clergy member does this. It's outrageous every time it happens whether it's a teacher, coach, doctor, neighbor, or any other person. It's extra outrageous when it's a father, grandfather, or other close relative. You choose to be extra outraged only when it's a Catholic.

No, you choose to deflect blame by claiming it’s anti-Catholic.

I did? Where? Please quote the post you are attributing to me.

per you, nobody is allowed to comment on a Catholic priest sexual abuse case unless they also comment on other cases. this is a false construct you use to escape blame by deflecting. infuriating, but transparently obvious to everyone except you and your fellow paleo Catholics.

DP. I'm not Catholic so I have no dog in this fight. But you don't realize your obsessive hatred of Catholics--as evidenced in your obsessive posting about individual Catholic priests to the exclusion of all other sexual abusers--is alienating people who might otherwise agree with you about this particular priest or about general problems in the Catholic Church.

Your absolute failure to call out teachers and uncles, and your exclusive obsession with Catholics, translates to us understanding, very clearly, that you're a bigot.

And that's too bad. Because once we've written you off as a bigot--and you absolutely are a bigot--anything you post about important things (like this one particular priest) gets lost in the swirling cesspool of your bigotry and peoples' reactions to that.

This is truly a pitiful reaction. You really do believe you can strong-arm people into not criticizing the Catholic Church, don’t you?

I’m not Catholic. My concern is straight-up bigotry, like yours, that undermines the broader fight against pedophelia.

If you wanted to be taken seriously, you wouldn’t make everything about yourself and your bigotry. You also seem pretty defensive when you’re called out on it.

Help us fight pedophelia. Don’t be an attention-seeking a$$hat.

Oh give it up. There is NO “straight up bigotry” here unless you think the mere mention of a pedophile priest is bigoted. Go back and read the thread. OP posted the link, and then immediately the apologists started accusing OP of being anti-Catholic. Literally that is what happened - some people want to use false claimes of bigotry to shut up any discussion of Catholic abuse.

It’s the pattern of behavior going back years in this forum. So many people, including on this thread, have pointed this pattern out. You pretending it doesn’t exist won’t make the long pattern of bigotry go away.

You actually care about pedophelia, instead of just scoring points against Catholics? Then grow up and own your behavior.

There is no such pattern of behavior. DCUM always has posts on child abuse in the news - many threads on the Washington Hebrew Congregation, LAMB, etc. It’s only in your twisted mind that any mention of Catholic abuse is bigoted. Seriously step back and think about what you are trying to claim.

You know you’re lying, we know you’re lying.

It’s like a ritual on DCUM: comb the national news to find a priest in Syracuse, and make your weekly post about it. How long ago were the posts about local orgs like LAMB and Washington Hebrew? Where are the threads about schools and other religions in Syracuse?

If you care about pedophelia, stop linking it in everybody’s minds to your own bigotry.

stop digging yourself this hole, lol.