Rose Montoya in the White House

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House agrees with OP and has responded

https://twitter.com/WardDPatrick/status/1668652292491362304?s=20

“This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events.”

Bravo.

Yes, they came out and made a statement. That just fixes everything!!! Wow, what bravery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she didn’t hurt anyone. Her behavior was gross but ultimately reflects poorly on her. She’s super trashy! She should be given a misdemeanor for public nudity.

Meanwhile, conservatives think 1/6 insurrectionists should be pardoned. Conservatives in the US dont make sense anymore.

I am OP and I am not conservative. But should we excuse her behavior based on her gender? I voted for Biden, but his standing next to her and supporting her in this act gives me a second thought.

He did not "support her in this act."

She did it while wondering around the grounds. What was his involvement in her publicity stunt?

She is nominated for some LGBTQ award and probably thought this would land her the prize. I hope it disqualifies her (for setting the cause back)

If you invited someone to your house and they decided to act out while in your yard, is that your fault?

Your logic makes no sense.

He invited her.

I don’t invite people to my house with a history of bad behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House agrees with OP and has responded

https://twitter.com/WardDPatrick/status/1668652292491362304?s=20

“This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events.”

Bravo.

Would be nice if this shuts up the idiot who claims she and Biden planned this scheme together.

But no, they will likely just come at him from another direction. Because they is what they do, regardless of the facts.

A statement. Well that just means the world to me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this a man who transitioned to a woman? Honest question. If that's the case, maybe she doesn't realize men can bare their chests but inappropriate for women. Never mind this is the White House and super inappropriate and uncalled for. Trashy. Really trashy.

Yeah, I’m sure it was an honest mistake.

[Anonymous]

If she was still a he and whipped out their penis, how would that go over?
Isn’t indecent exposure against the law, even if a misdemeanor?

And to the pp who declared that nursing an infant in public is equivalent to exposing oneself in a sexual way— you’re repressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she didn’t hurt anyone. Her behavior was gross but ultimately reflects poorly on her. She’s super trashy! She should be given a misdemeanor for public nudity.

Meanwhile, conservatives think 1/6 insurrectionists should be pardoned. Conservatives in the US dont make sense anymore.

I am OP and I am not conservative. But should we excuse her behavior based on her gender? I voted for Biden, but his standing next to her and supporting her in this act gives me a second thought.

He did not "support her in this act."

She did it while wondering around the grounds. What was his involvement in her publicity stunt?

She is nominated for some LGBTQ award and probably thought this would land her the prize. I hope it disqualifies her (for setting the cause back)

If you invited someone to your house and they decided to act out while in your yard, is that your fault?

Your logic makes no sense.

He invited her.

I don’t invite people to my house with a history of bad behavior

Clearly Bidens household have more lax rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this a man who transitioned to a woman? Honest question. If that's the case, maybe she doesn't realize men can bare their chests but inappropriate for women. Never mind this is the White House and super inappropriate and uncalled for. Trashy. Really trashy.

Are you implying that he still has male brain and thinks like a male?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a man who transitioned to a woman? Honest question. If that's the case, maybe she doesn't realize men can bare their chests but inappropriate for women. Never mind this is the White House and super inappropriate and uncalled for. Trashy. Really trashy.

Are you implying that he still has male brain and thinks like a male?

DP, but people who are anti-trans and insist on using male pronouns for Rose Montoya should not be offended, because aren’t those just man boobs?

[Anonymous]

This behavior is not acceptable and the person who did it is an incredibly selfish idiot who happily went head and hurt the cause of all trans kids just to get a few more views online. Just a POS. Kudos for the WH for swiftly reacting and publicly censoring the behavior and saying that person will never be invited again. As a side note, i hope they also review the process for inviting people because clearly somebody made a mistake here.

[Anonymous]

Love it. Absolutely love it.

It’s the perfect thumb in the eye to all the cons, prudes, haters and bigots.

She’s beautiful and sassy and I love it!

[Anonymous]

State media in Russia is having a field day with this sad event

[Anonymous]

She succeeded in getting all Republicans to regard her as a woman.

[Anonymous]

Banning her is totally uncalled for. What an absolutely tonedeaf thing to do.

It makes the WH look like a bunch of evangelicals boycotting Bud Light.

[Anonymous]

No. It's completely appropriate and lenient. You are in the minority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. It's completely appropriate and lenient. You are in the minority.

+1