Rose Montoya in the White House

[Anonymous]

Were there any children at this event?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Were there any children at this event?

Yes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is a he and trans isn’t real then what’s wrong? Men are allowed to go topples. Women should be too tbh.

That is an interesting conundrum for conservatives. By acknowledging the toplessness, you validate transgenderism.

What is the interesting conundrum? Person had surgery to put on a costume. Mental...

[Anonymous]

I agree this is so tacky and inappropriate. Disgusting no matter who does it. And I am fine with topless beaches etc but at the WH is just not it.

But I don’t think this is an argument against trans folks. This is one idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The White House agrees with OP and has responded

https://twitter.com/WardDPatrick/status/1668652292491362304?s=20

“This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events.”

Great statement fromm the White House. Frankly perhaps you can equate this Montoya fool to the well known idiocy of the Epstein types. There were so many nice normal people at DC Pride events including families. Go back to Drag Queen Story Hour Mclean - honestly could have had 2 dads 2 moms reading. In fact any of them might normally be doing story hour anywhere. https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/drag-storybook-hour-gets-mixed-reviews/article_70635b4c-e575-11eb-9bd1-076bb587b678.html

FC Public Library runs story times. From lapsit babies to pre K. Cat is a dog and vice versa for age groups that are learning which animal is a cat and which a dog?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree this is so tacky and inappropriate. Disgusting no matter who does it. And I am fine with topless beaches etc but at the WH is just not it.

But I don’t think this is an argument against trans folks. This is one idiot.

True, but unfortunately this will probably set the cause back a couple of decades at least. Really dumb thing to do.

[Anonymous]

I support trans rights and this stunt just hurts the community and cause. Really, what an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree, OP. Unfortunately this picture will be the only picture many people will see from the White House event.

Stop giving the homophobes ammunition.

No, the other picture we see is the pride flag given the position of prominence in a display with the American flag, in violation of flag protocol/etiquette. Honestly, as much as Ms Rose M debased the White House, the flag violation at the White House is more disturbing.

Dude I just watched a guy marching in front of the Miami Courthouse wearing an American flag as a poncho, with a pig's head on a pike with an American flag stuck in its mouth. I don't want to hear about "flag violations" from Republicans today.

That was a protester AGAINST Trump, you dope. You know, the usual unhinged LWNJ.

"An opponent of Donald Trump carries a pig’s head on a stake in front of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. U.S. Federal Courthouse before the arraignment of former president on Tuesday."

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/06/donald-trump-indictment-photos-miami-courthouse.html

+100
I’ve seen the false claim that he was a Trump supporter in other threads. I guess that’s wishful thinking on the part of liberals. Pig-on-spike man was a LWNJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is a he and trans isn’t real then what’s wrong? Men are allowed to go topples. Women should be too tbh.

That is an interesting conundrum for conservatives. By acknowledging the toplessness, you validate transgenderism.

It's not a conundrum. If all chests were the same, then Rose wouldn't have need to have undergone a painful and expensive surgery. Gender matters or it doesn't, but it can't be both critically important and wholly imaginary.

DP and the PP makes an excellent point. Yes it is a conundrum for you. Your claim has always been that she and every other transwoman are not women, they are males and bare male chests have never been a problem. It hasn't ever been illegal for males to bare their chests in the United States for the last 100 years. It's a conundrum for you and you can't dodge it.

Again: do you actually think it's appropriate for a person of ANY gender to bare their chest at the White House? We'll wait.

^ American Taliban thinks every American regardless of gender should be required to wear a burqa.

DP. I'm sorry that you're offended by the cultural norm of "wearing a shirt" when in formal or semi formal places. Not sure why this is Republican or Democratic issue. Or what point you think you are making.

A pride party is supposed to be "formal or semi formal?" According to who, Ms. Pride Party Expert?

Quit trolling. You just look more idiotic than usual. And again - had this been someone going topless at the Trump WH, you’d be outraged.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is a he and trans isn’t real then what’s wrong? Men are allowed to go topples. Women should be too tbh.

That is an interesting conundrum for conservatives. By acknowledging the toplessness, you validate transgenderism.

It's not a conundrum. If all chests were the same, then Rose wouldn't have need to have undergone a painful and expensive surgery. Gender matters or it doesn't, but it can't be both critically important and wholly imaginary.

DP and the PP makes an excellent point. Yes it is a conundrum for you. Your claim has always been that she and every other transwoman are not women, they are males and bare male chests have never been a problem. It hasn't ever been illegal for males to bare their chests in the United States for the last 100 years. It's a conundrum for you and you can't dodge it.

Again: do you actually think it's appropriate for a person of ANY gender to bare their chest at the White House? We'll wait.

^ American Taliban thinks every American regardless of gender should be required to wear a burqa.

DP. I'm sorry that you're offended by the cultural norm of "wearing a shirt" when in formal or semi formal places. Not sure why this is Republican or Democratic issue. Or what point you think you are making.

A pride party is supposed to be "formal or semi formal?" According to who, Ms. Pride Party Expert?

Okay, so your position is that the WH knew full well that this activity would happen, and were indeed inviting people to do this at the WH?

NP. I maintain that if these same individuals have behaved badly prior, they will again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Were there any children at this event?

Yes - but again, that’s not even the point. It’s the White House. Not surprising that basic decorum has to be explained to a liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House agrees with OP and has responded

https://twitter.com/WardDPatrick/status/1668652292491362304?s=20

“This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events.”

Great statement fromm the White House. Frankly perhaps you can equate this Montoya fool to the well known idiocy of the Epstein types. There were so many nice normal people at DC Pride events including families. Go back to Drag Queen Story Hour Mclean - honestly could have had 2 dads 2 moms reading. In fact any of them might normally be doing story hour anywhere. https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/drag-storybook-hour-gets-mixed-reviews/article_70635b4c-e575-11eb-9bd1-076bb587b678.html

FC Public Library runs story times. From lapsit babies to pre K. Cat is a dog and vice versa for age groups that are learning which animal is a cat and which a dog?

Who are YOU to say which is a cat and which is a dog? That’s for the cat and dog to decide!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Were there any children at this event?

Why do you think it is appropriate to expose your body to the adults? I don't want to see your genitals or boobs (either fake or real), keep them to yourself.

[Anonymous]

Sickening and disgusting but unfortunately, not unexpected from this crew

[Anonymous]

I think the entire event was inappropriate