So Rudy G is being sued and - it's much worse than what you might have imagined

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So gross. There isn't enough money in the world to choke that chicken.

[Anonymous]

The worst is while he is on top of her he says he thinks of her like his daughter, then asks her if that's weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope I don’t get flamed for this, but…the way I read the complaint, I have doubts that she was actually an employee. It seemed like she was more of a girlfriend who was willing to hold her nose and subjugate herself for money. She was his arm candy and also someone who he bounced ideas. (Stupid ones) off and she played that role. In looking at some of the texts where she mentions Neimens or the Valentines Day hotel, that is not work. Her picture of herself on a golf course, in a short dress, is not something that an executive would wear. From a legal perspective, I think she will have a very difficult time in proving she was an employee.

That being said, I do believe ALL the gross stuff he did and said and that he’s basically a sex-crazed raging sadistic alcoholic. But, misogynistic men who are in a power play with women and demean them are a dime a dozen, unfortunately.

What I’m actually horrified about is that this man had access to power, abused that power, was willing to sell that access and treated our country ‘s security so recklessly and carelessly. That someone so corrupt and idiotic was in a such a position of power and influence and had access to classified information in our country blows my mind.

If you read the complaint then you know he logged her into his work email so they she could screen it for him, including privileged information. You also know he introduced her as an employee to third parties. You know he’s been recorded talking about her interview.

If someone is legally employed, it's easy to prove. There will be tax forms signed and filed. Not sure why there is a discussion, nothing to discuss about something easy to verify.

No because he made up this excuse that he could not pay her up front until his divorce was settled. He told her that his wife's lawyers were monitoring his cash flow and he needed to hide it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Somehow one of the least f**ked up allegations in this thing is that Rudy and Trump were selling pardons for $2 million a pop:

"132. [Giuliani] also asked Ms. Dunphy if she knew anyone in need of a pardon, telling her that he was selling pardons for $2 million, which he and President Trump would split. He told Ms. Dunphy that she could refer individuals seeking pardons to him, so long as they did not go through “the normal channels” of the Office of the Pardon Attorney, because correspondence going to that office would be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act."

Okay, combining the information in this post and the one before it helps me understand. If Rudy had talked about just Trump selling pardons, it might have been covered by attorney-client privilege.

However, if Rudy was advancing a joint criminal enterprise (them selling pardons together), the privilege does not apply.

And it just floats on by. No one cares, somehow, that the former guy was selling pardons? No one?

Are you paying attention to politics for the first time? Pardons have been very obviously for sale for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

OP was right - the details are so much decrepit and worse than I expected even for him …

Hopefully, this woman has many witnesses and recordings that can attest to her work. Her Ivy credentials speak for themselves. Unfortunately she trusted his rationale for not putting her on the employment books - it sounds very plausible but needs hard evidence …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OP was right - the details are so much decrepit and worse than I expected even for him …

Hopefully, this woman has many witnesses and recordings that can attest to her work. Her Ivy credentials speak for themselves. Unfortunately she trusted his rationale for not putting her on the employment books - it sounds very plausible but needs hard evidence …

I am confused about Ivy's credentials. In what world would any Ivy graduate would agree to work for $12,000 for two years ($6,000 per year)? Is this a thing that Ivy graduates do? Is she independently wealthy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OP was right - the details are so much decrepit and worse than I expected even for him …

Hopefully, this woman has many witnesses and recordings that can attest to her work. Her Ivy credentials speak for themselves. Unfortunately she trusted his rationale for not putting her on the employment books - it sounds very plausible but needs hard evidence …

I am confused about Ivy's credentials. In what world would any Ivy graduate would agree to work for $12,000 for two years ($6,000 per year)? Is this a thing that Ivy graduates do? Is she independently wealthy?

Did you read the complaint?

[Anonymous]

He paid her cash... that doesn't mean it was a legal job. She could have been one of the personal assistant-friend with benefits type of person. These stories aren't uncommon. A vulnerable attractive woman in need of funds and an older wealthy man in need of special companionship = the oldest story in the book.

Did you read the complaint? I would take her case in a heartbeat.

She recorded him (several times) promising to pay her once (pick the event) happened, and he received (pick the amount.) Rudy specifically told other employees to reimburse her for "business expenses" such as travel, meals, etc.

It gets even better. Rudy told her about his plans to be paid under the table (by clients, business partners, etc.) so he would not have to report the income.

The promise of compensation can be as compelling as actual compensation in a case like this. Also, she recorded him promising to handle legal matters for her. This means he was both her employer and her lawyer.

I hope she did not record it when she provided oral or PIV sex. No jury in the world could unhear that.

[Anonymous]

I am confused about Ivy's credentials. In what world would any Ivy graduate would agree to work for $12,000 for two years ($6,000 per year)? Is this a thing that Ivy graduates do? Is she independently wealthy?

Did you read the complaint?

DP - I did read it. Rudy promised her millions in compensation and free legal help, and she has it on tape.

I would work for $12K for two years if I received $2 million at the end of it, and I got a world-famous attorney (at least until he is disbarred) to handle a case that was important to me.

However, the hardest part to swallow (sorry, I could not help it) is that she put out for so long before pulling the plug.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He paid her cash... that doesn't mean it was a legal job. She could have been one of the personal assistant-friend with benefits type of person. These stories aren't uncommon. A vulnerable attractive woman in need of funds and an older wealthy man in need of special companionship = the oldest story in the book.

Did you read the complaint? I would take her case in a heartbeat.

She recorded him (several times) promising to pay her once (pick the event) happened, and he received (pick the amount.) Rudy specifically told other employees to reimburse her for "business expenses" such as travel, meals, etc.

It gets even better. Rudy told her about his plans to be paid under the table (by clients, business partners, etc.) so he would not have to report the income.

The promise of compensation can be as compelling as actual compensation in a case like this. Also, she recorded him promising to handle legal matters for her. This means he was both her employer and her lawyer.

I hope she did not record it when she provided oral or PIV sex. No jury in the world could unhear that.

I read the complaint. I still don't understand what kind of smart educated person would buy into that arrangement if she could go and work for 6 digits salary even back then? Why would you agree to be paid under the table $6,000 per year? I am not questioning her sexual abuse claim at all, I am trying to understand what was her motivation to agree to that arrangment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I am confused about Ivy's credentials. In what world would any Ivy graduate would agree to work for $12,000 for two years ($6,000 per year)? Is this a thing that Ivy graduates do? Is she independently wealthy?

Did you read the complaint?

DP - I did read it. Rudy promised her millions in compensation and free legal help, and she has it on tape.

I would work for $12K for two years if I received $2 million at the end of it, and I got a world-famous attorney (at least until he is disbarred) to handle a case that was important to me.

However, the hardest part to swallow (sorry, I could not help it) is that she put out for so long before pulling the plug.

IF some big lawyers in DC or NYC offer you that arrangement tomorrow, would you agree to that? How do you think you can enforce him for failing to pay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He paid her cash... that doesn't mean it was a legal job. She could have been one of the personal assistant-friend with benefits type of person. These stories aren't uncommon. A vulnerable attractive woman in need of funds and an older wealthy man in need of special companionship = the oldest story in the book.

Did you read the complaint? I would take her case in a heartbeat.

She recorded him (several times) promising to pay her once (pick the event) happened, and he received (pick the amount.) Rudy specifically told other employees to reimburse her for "business expenses" such as travel, meals, etc.

It gets even better. Rudy told her about his plans to be paid under the table (by clients, business partners, etc.) so he would not have to report the income.

The promise of compensation can be as compelling as actual compensation in a case like this. Also, she recorded him promising to handle legal matters for her. This means he was both her employer and her lawyer.

I hope she did not record it when she provided oral or PIV sex. No jury in the world could unhear that.

I read the complaint. I still don't understand what kind of smart educated person would buy into that arrangement if she could go and work for 6 digits salary even back then? Why would you agree to be paid under the table $6,000 per year? I am not questioning her sexual abuse claim at all, I am trying to understand what was her motivation to agree to that arrangment.

$2,000,000 was her motivation

[Anonymous]

“America’s Mayor”

Hoo boy…

[Anonymous]

She is very courageous.

Respect. I hope all goes well for her.