Reply to So Rudy G is being sued and - it's much worse than what you might have imagined

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "So Rudy G is being sued and - it's much worse than what you might have imagined"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hope I don’t get flamed for this, but…the way I read the complaint, I have doubts that she was actually an employee. It seemed like she was more of a girlfriend who was willing to hold her nose and subjugate herself for money. She was his arm candy and also someone who he bounced ideas. (Stupid ones) off and she played that role. In looking at some of the texts where she mentions Neimens or the Valentines Day hotel, that is not work. Her picture of herself on a golf course, in a short dress, is not something that an executive would wear. From a legal perspective, I think she will have a very difficult time in proving she was an employee.

That being said, I do believe ALL the gross stuff he did and said and that he’s basically a sex-crazed raging sadistic alcoholic. But, misogynistic men who are in a power play with women and demean them are a dime a dozen, unfortunately.

What I’m actually horrified about is that this man had access to power, abused that power, was willing to sell that access and treated our country ‘s security so recklessly and carelessly. That someone so corrupt and idiotic was in a such a position of power and influence and had access to classified information in our country blows my mind.[/quote]

If you read the complaint then you know he logged her into his work email so they she could screen it for him, including privileged information.  You also know he introduced her as an employee to third parties. You know he’s been recorded talking about her interview. [/quote]

If someone is legally employed, it's easy to prove.  There will be tax forms signed and filed.  Not sure why there is a discussion, nothing to discuss about something easy to verify. [/quote]

No because he made up this excuse that he could not pay her up front until his divorce was settled.  He told her that his wife's lawyers were monitoring his cash flow and he needed to hide it.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics