So Rudy G is being sued and - it's much worse than what you might have imagined

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He paid her cash... that doesn't mean it was a legal job. She could have been one of the personal assistant-friend with benefits type of person. These stories aren't uncommon. A vulnerable attractive woman in need of funds and an older wealthy man in need of special companionship = the oldest story in the book.

Did you read the complaint? I would take her case in a heartbeat.

She recorded him (several times) promising to pay her once (pick the event) happened, and he received (pick the amount.) Rudy specifically told other employees to reimburse her for "business expenses" such as travel, meals, etc.

It gets even better. Rudy told her about his plans to be paid under the table (by clients, business partners, etc.) so he would not have to report the income.

The promise of compensation can be as compelling as actual compensation in a case like this. Also, she recorded him promising to handle legal matters for her. This means he was both her employer and her lawyer.

I hope she did not record it when she provided oral or PIV sex. No jury in the world could unhear that.

I read the complaint. I still don't understand what kind of smart educated person would buy into that arrangement if she could go and work for 6 digits salary even back then? Why would you agree to be paid under the table $6,000 per year? I am not questioning her sexual abuse claim at all, I am trying to understand what was her motivation to agree to that arrangment.

She knew he was a grifter but she thought she was a partner in it and not another victim.

She’s not a victim, she had the means to work for free because at the time Giuliani was in with Trump and other powerful people. She should sue for wages that he promised but STFU about oral sex. She needed to walk out the door for good the first time he mentioned any type of sex but her wanting fame and power and more money won over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He paid her cash... that doesn't mean it was a legal job. She could have been one of the personal assistant-friend with benefits type of person. These stories aren't uncommon. A vulnerable attractive woman in need of funds and an older wealthy man in need of special companionship = the oldest story in the book.

Did you read the complaint? I would take her case in a heartbeat.

She recorded him (several times) promising to pay her once (pick the event) happened, and he received (pick the amount.) Rudy specifically told other employees to reimburse her for "business expenses" such as travel, meals, etc.

It gets even better. Rudy told her about his plans to be paid under the table (by clients, business partners, etc.) so he would not have to report the income.

The promise of compensation can be as compelling as actual compensation in a case like this. Also, she recorded him promising to handle legal matters for her. This means he was both her employer and her lawyer.

I hope she did not record it when she provided oral or PIV sex. No jury in the world could unhear that.

I read the complaint. I still don't understand what kind of smart educated person would buy into that arrangement if she could go and work for 6 digits salary even back then? Why would you agree to be paid under the table $6,000 per year? I am not questioning her sexual abuse claim at all, I am trying to understand what was her motivation to agree to that arrangment.

She knew he was a grifter but she thought she was a partner in it and not another victim.

She’s not a victim, she had the means to work for free because at the time Giuliani was in with Trump and other powerful people. She should sue for wages that he promised but STFU about oral sex. She needed to walk out the door for good the first time he mentioned any type of sex but her wanting fame and power and more money won over.

Yes he is the true victim.

[Anonymous]

None of these people are victims.