Right Winger Stephen Crowder abusing pregnant wife

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

Again, it’s part of the dynamic. She might have a habit of saying X and doing Y. You don’t know. The marriage counselor told my husband that not defining a time frame is a passive-aggressive move and is the same as lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

+1
He suggested she take one. Why can't he?
I'll also tell you why abuse victims don't state a time frame. If they're even a minute off that "promised" time home, they have to account for it. You think, based on what's on that video, if she said "I'll be back in one hour" and she's back in one hour and 15 minutes, that's going to fly with this a-hole? She's vague because she has to be.
Any guy who suggests his 8-month pregnant wife take an uber to the grocery store (a family chore) so he can go to the gym (personal fun time) is no man.

That’s an assumption you are making. He stated he needed to use the car and told her what he would like to do - gym and see his parents. He was negotiating time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

+1
He suggested she take one. Why can't he?
I'll also tell you why abuse victims don't state a time frame. If they're even a minute off that "promised" time home, they have to account for it. You think, based on what's on that video, if she said "I'll be back in one hour" and she's back in one hour and 15 minutes, that's going to fly with this a-hole? She's vague because she has to be.
Any guy who suggests his 8-month pregnant wife take an uber to the grocery store (a family chore) so he can go to the gym (personal fun time) is no man.

That’s an assumption you are making. He stated he needed to use the car and told her what he would like to do - gym and see his parents. He was negotiating time.

So. Take. An. Uber. Like. He's. Asking. An. 8-month. Pregnant. Woman. To. Do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

+1
He suggested she take one. Why can't he?
I'll also tell you why abuse victims don't state a time frame. If they're even a minute off that "promised" time home, they have to account for it. You think, based on what's on that video, if she said "I'll be back in one hour" and she's back in one hour and 15 minutes, that's going to fly with this a-hole? She's vague because she has to be.
Any guy who suggests his 8-month pregnant wife take an uber to the grocery store (a family chore) so he can go to the gym (personal fun time) is no man.

That’s an assumption you are making. He stated he needed to use the car and told her what he would like to do - gym and see his parents. He was negotiating time.

So. Take. An. Uber. Like. He's. Asking. An. 8-month. Pregnant. Woman. To. Do.

Exactly this. It’s insane. She is going to do an activity for the family. Grocery shopping. He’s wanting to do recreational stuff. He needs to find transportation, not her. Or better yet, they should have had two cars. Obviously we know that won’t happen because this allowed him to trap her in the house in freaking Texas where you can’t get anywhere without a car.

I don’t know if anyone else caught it but in the beginning of the video she said she’ll ask someone else for a ride. She asked him to who she wants to ask because that’s the level of control he was exerting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

Again, it’s part of the dynamic. She might have a habit of saying X and doing Y. You don’t know. The marriage counselor told my husband that not defining a time frame is a passive-aggressive move and is the same as lying.

I don’t post this often, but your lived experience is no relevant here.
Perhaps you are looking for the relationship forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

+1
He suggested she take one. Why can't he?
I'll also tell you why abuse victims don't state a time frame. If they're even a minute off that "promised" time home, they have to account for it. You think, based on what's on that video, if she said "I'll be back in one hour" and she's back in one hour and 15 minutes, that's going to fly with this a-hole? She's vague because she has to be.
Any guy who suggests his 8-month pregnant wife take an uber to the grocery store (a family chore) so he can go to the gym (personal fun time) is no man.

That’s an assumption you are making. He stated he needed to use the car and told her what he would like to do - gym and see his parents. He was negotiating time.

So. Take. An. Uber. Like. He's. Asking. An. 8-month. Pregnant. Woman. To. Do.

Exactly this. It’s insane. She is going to do an activity for the family. Grocery shopping. He’s wanting to do recreational stuff. He needs to find transportation, not her. Or better yet, they should have had two cars. Obviously we know that won’t happen because this allowed him to trap her in the house in freaking Texas where you can’t get anywhere without a car.

I don’t know if anyone else caught it but in the beginning of the video she said she’ll ask someone else for a ride. She asked him to who she wants to ask because that’s the level of control he was exerting.

Or she's become so isolated from his control that she has no one to ask and it was more of a rhetorical question.... Either one sucks.
I can't believe anyone is defending this dumpster fire of a human being. Looking at your very pregnant wife and saying I don't love you, that you're not "wife worthy." That's just a level of cruelty that's indefensible. I work with abuse victims and it's always jarring when you see it on video. People really are cruel.

[Anonymous]

DCUM favorite B e t h a n y has a really dumb take on this - somehow it’s the left’s fault that Crowder is a terrible husband?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

Again, it’s part of the dynamic. She might have a habit of saying X and doing Y. You don’t know. The marriage counselor told my husband that not defining a time frame is a passive-aggressive move and is the same as lying.

I don’t post this often, but your lived experience is no relevant here.
Perhaps you are looking for the relationship forum.

PP is either an intentional troll or so obtuse he simply refuses to see any viewpoint other than his own.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM favorite B e t h a n y has a really dumb take on this - somehow it’s the left’s fault that Crowder is a terrible husband?

Yeah, that's quite a take. It's really, really ok to just say he's a jerk and leave it at that.

[Anonymous]

Even though he wasnt yelling, there was a quality to his voice that was very frightening and intimidating when he said, "Watch it. Watch it." You could almost feel what might happen later..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Classic abusive retaliation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

I think the real question I'm starting to have is why are some of the people in this thread so invested in believing that Stephen isn't a horrible human? Defending someone that treated his wife this way says a lot more about the right wing people that come to this board than anything else I've ever read here.

This is an excellent question. He's utterly repellent otherwise:

He's sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even though he wasnt yelling, there was a quality to his voice that was very frightening and intimidating when he said, "Watch it. Watch it." You could almost feel what might happen later..

Anything other than blind obedience could be described the same. At some point you are diluting the power of the word abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he wasnt yelling, there was a quality to his voice that was very frightening and intimidating when he said, "Watch it. Watch it." You could almost feel what might happen later..

Anything other than blind obedience could be described the same. At some point you are diluting the power of the word abuse.

What are you saying?