My kid is one of the interviewers and was required to participate in unconscious bias training before signing up for interviewer slots. They and their friends who are doing this are all taking the job very seriously. I've heard no conversations about looks, but have heard them talking about thoughtful questions and wanting to do their part to contribute to building a solid cohort of students for the incoming grade. Yes, it's basically a lottery of 4.0 kids, but it really does a disservice to these students to continue painting the process as some sort of beauty pageant. |
|
We are in the same boat, I hope that doesn't mean our offer was taken away! |
|
I think the biggest problem is that they go by seventh grade GPAs, and make no differentiation of the school attended, the course difficulty and the grading policies….
In a few years time, I think MacArthur high school will likely out rank SWW in terms of quality and desireability |
|
Look, I don't think there is a lot of merit to the allegations of selection based on looks/beauty pageant. But if it IS just a lottery of 4.0 kids (and I agree it is), they should get rid of the interview. The way the interview is "weighted" in the process opens the entire process up to scrutiny vs. just saying, all kids in DC with a 4.0 who apply to SWW are entered in a lottery for the available spots. |
| Email went out this afternoon from SWW: if you haven’t yet been contacted for an interview you are not getting one. |
How would they differentiate by school? I might argue it’s not fair to claim a 3.7 at Basis is a stronger student than a 3.7 at a DCPS middle school. Who’s to say the kid at the DCPS wouldn’t get a 3.7 at Basis? There is no way to do this in a fair way. |
Exactly! How can you prove that a 4.0 student from Deal is a stronger student than a 4.0 student (native or non-native bilingual) from Oyster-Adams? It can’t be proven. |
Even if you got an initial email? |
|
| Time to reinstate an admissions test |
| Maybe they only sent out the March 4th Slots? Did anyone get a slot for the 11th today? |
+1 Also- for this group of kids, 7th grade was their return from virtual learning. Some kids might have struggled to get back into the swing of school/ COVID impact. A 3.5 student last year might have been a 4.0 student in another situation. They had no chance of making the Wall’s cut this year. |
|
Good afternoon, parents, and students. Thank you for taking the time to apply to School Without Walls for the upcoming school year.
Although your student met the minimum GPA requirement of a 3.0 at the end of the last school year to be considered for admissions to SWW, as we advanced through the interview process his/her GPA scored below our 2023 bar for an interview, largely due to an exceptionally large applicant pool. As your child will not be continuing with our process, we wanted you to have this information as early as possible so you may consider some of the other great high school opportunities in DCPS. Students did a fantastic job last school year and should be praised for their hard work. We appreciate your consideration in School Without Walls and wish you the best during this admission season. Thank you, School Without Walls Administration Warmly, N. Hardge |