|
Hmm. Actions speak louder than words. "Russian officials said no invasion of Ukraine was underway and none was planned." https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-17/russia-tells-u-s-no-ukraine-invasion-planned-tass-says?leadSource=uverify%20wall |
The lack of knowledge about how much we’ve sold out to China and how hard it would now be to even get the parts/supplies to manufacture our own stuff without China is a liberal thing. |
Huh. Why would we station people in neighboring countries we are at war with? Why why why why why… |
Hmm. No. Not accurate. First, it depends on when you're referring to. The shift to Taiwan was actually a counter-reaction result of the 70's-80's General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the US-Japan semiconductor wars? https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1406&context=mjil https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=mjil Then came the "free willy" approach to mass outsourcing and "sell out" by many U.S. manufacturers, probably around the 2002 amendment to the Trade Agreements Act (TAA) as well as NAFTA; then went out of control from there. https://gsa.federalschedules.com/resources/taa-designated-countries/ "In both the House and the Senate, more Democrats voted against NAFTA than for it" https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/09/history-lesson-more-republicans-than-democrats-supported-nafta/ So, if you want to point a finger, it's towards corruption and greed on both sides of the aisle, as well as corporate America? |
Really? It was Richard Nixon and his administration that opened China up to the US and the global world. It was republicans that opened that floodgate and everyone else walked right through. |