| Don’t send my son (who’s a year away from 18) for this bullsh1t. I’ll be damn if I let Brandon drag him to his mess. |
They’re not hitting their targets bc the military is more worried about making sure soldiers use the correct pronouns than they are about winning wars. True story, folks! |
If you didn’t know, stop typing, start reading, then come back with a better understanding of things |
True this!! |
it's still a massive jobs program with bloated staffing. If the can't get enough people in the combat arms, then worry. |
Pentagon told straight whites they aren’t wanted and they got the message. |
If your kid was in the military because that was the best opportunity for him/her, How would you feel about them being ordered to Taiwan? Dying in Taiwan? Or Ukraine? Worth it? |
Well, our nephew had to go into Iraq, even though the culprits were in Afghanistan. So it would be same old, same old, same as when republicans were in power. |
|
Repubs are not 100% culpable. Go ask Kerry and Hillary why they voted for the resolution, then.
That 60 Minutes interview with Albright saying all those dead Iraqi children were worth it was revolting, too. Both parties serve their war machine masters. |
I'm not talking about Kerry or Albright or parties. Would YOU be willing to send your kid to die in Taiwan? I'd rather chop my kid's foot off "Misery" style. |
The military was competent then and better at winning. The woke military is not dealing with reality at its core and nobody will join a dangerous occupation in such a state. |
As mentioned above, this is a dumb question. If they are in the military and ordered to go they don't have a choice. And YOU (the parent have absolutely no say in the matter). |
| Sure, if our kid joins the military, you are sent where you are sent. At this point, it's either going to be in the vicinity of China or Russia. Not sure why you are so surprised. |
|
DP. Here's my take on why Taiwan is important.
Political. They're a long-term U.S. ally. Military. They're an important counter-balance to keep sea lanes open. Otherwise at least two air / naval groups (north / south of Taiwan) would be required to cover the region from a security perspective. Look at any map and it's obvious that China would be able to completely cut off traffic traversing the Luzan straight through the South China Sea corridor and the Philippine Navy could do squat about it. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/South_China_Sea_Claims_and_Boundary_Agreements_2012.jpg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-05/philippines-says-four-chinese-vessels-tailed-its-navy-ship?leadSource=uverify%20wall Social. Taiwan somewhat fills the gap left by Hong Kong to bridge many cultural divides between mainland China and the West. The Taiwanese are able to do things that Western companies and politicians can't at a social level; and is a thorn in the side of the CCP's "one China" policies. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2022/02/07/why-is-unification-so-unpopular-in-taiwan-its-the-prc-political-system-not-just-culture/ Economic. If Taiwan was invaded, the U.S. tech industry would be in trouble. "Taiwan accounts for around 65% of global semiconductor supply, and nearly 90% of the smallest and most sophisticated chips. And one Taiwan-based semiconductor producer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), is alone responsible for 55% of the world’s supply. That’s a more dominant position than OPEC commands in oil production." https://www.supplychainbrain.com/blogs/1-think-tank/post/36085-does-the-us-need-to-reduce-its-dependence-on-taiwan-for-semiconductors |