MoCo council candidates

[Anonymous]

Why would you prefer Hucker?

[Anonymous]

I was hoping fewer candidates would throw their hat in the ring this time so that we had a chance of getting rid of Elrich but they’re all going to split the vote again aren’t they.

Right there with you and super irritated about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would you prefer Hucker?

Trying to under who this pro-Hucker constituency is will be interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Friedson is the most competent one on the council. You got Jawando who hates police and thinks everyone is out to get him. Riemer and Hucker whose opinions change based on whatever will get them elected. Navarro who's just not that bright. Katz is OK (the only actual businessperson on the Council) but doesnt' seem to stand up for the people much. Albornoz is a ladder-climber but also a yes-man.

Friedson does stuff like question why the county needs to pass toothless resolutions on international affairs for example. (Leave that for Congress please).

I will say that, IME, Hucker is typically very responsive to constituent concerns (I’m in his district). I may not agree with him in everything but I feel like he does listen to people. He’s not eligible for another term though, right?

He is, but he's running for County Executive.

LOL. Guess someone doesn’t feel very confident that he can win in a district without TP votes and probably also knows better than anyone how weak Riemer is.

These people can’t help themselves. I was hoping fewer candidates would throw their hat in the ring this time so that we had a chance of getting rid of Elrich but they’re all going to split the vote again aren’t they. I’d actually prefer Hucker over Reimer/Elrich but don’t think he’d win, I think he’s more likely siphon off votes from Blair.

He’s clearly taking votes from Riemer. He’ll probably even centerpiece his campaign in how he delivered Thrive, which was DOA out of committee by Riemer, through his adept skills or whatever as council president.

Running on Thrive is a sure loser countywide. But for the people who care about this crap, he’s probably going to present himself as offering a “mature” choice to Riemer.

It’s honestly funny. I love schadenfreude and Riemer and Anderson deserve it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s honestly funny. I love schadenfreude and Riemer and Anderson deserve it.

Albornoz said he's going to hold hearings and markups on Thrive into the New Year. That's really going to mess up Anderson's plans to run, because he'll have to choose between finishing Thrive and running. No way he can without developer money, which he would have to raise fast to be competitive, and he can't take developer money and run planning at the same time.

[Anonymous]

Apologies for the slightly off topic question...but curious what news sources you tend to follow in order to stay abreast of MoCo news. I just moved to the area from Capitol Hill. I did a pretty good job of staying on top of DC Council news, but I feel like I don't get exposed to any news regarding the MoCo council.

[Anonymous]

Isn’t David Blair running too? He’s a moderate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would you prefer Hucker?

Trying to under who this pro-Hucker constituency is will be interesting.

Is this the pro-Reimer constituency talking? I simply think, relatively speaking, Hucker is more competent than Elrich and less sleazy than Reimer. It’s a pretty low bar to clear when you think about it, none of them are that great. As of now Blair would get my vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would you prefer Hucker?

Trying to under who this pro-Hucker constituency is will be interesting.

Is this the pro-Reimer constituency talking? I simply think, relatively speaking, Hucker is more competent than Elrich and less sleazy than Reimer. It’s a pretty low bar to clear when you think about it, none of them are that great. As of now Blair would get my vote.

Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would you prefer Hucker?

Trying to under who this pro-Hucker constituency is will be interesting.

Is this the pro-Reimer constituency talking? I simply think, relatively speaking, Hucker is more competent than Elrich and less sleazy than Reimer. It’s a pretty low bar to clear when you think about it, none of them are that great. As of now Blair would get my vote.

Why?

DP but it’s true that Hucker is more competent than Elrich and less sleazy than Riemer. It’s also true that Blair would be a better executive because he would be less beholden to the agenda of the council. Having a CE that leads the agenda is critical. The council is incapable of leading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apologies for the slightly off topic question...but curious what news sources you tend to follow in order to stay abreast of MoCo news. I just moved to the area from Capitol Hill. I did a pretty good job of staying on top of DC Council news, but I feel like I don't get exposed to any news regarding the MoCo council.

The only reasonable source is Bethesda Beat. Otherwise you’ve got WTOP and WaPo. Your neighborhood listserv is also important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s honestly funny. I love schadenfreude and Riemer and Anderson deserve it.

Albornoz said he's going to hold hearings and markups on Thrive into the New Year. That's really going to mess up Anderson's plans to run, because he'll have to choose between finishing Thrive and running. No way he can without developer money, which he would have to raise fast to be competitive, and he can't take developer money and run planning at the same time.

Fascinating. When you behave like a prick to so many people it eventually will come back to bite you in *ss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apologies for the slightly off topic question...but curious what news sources you tend to follow in order to stay abreast of MoCo news. I just moved to the area from Capitol Hill. I did a pretty good job of staying on top of DC Council news, but I feel like I don't get exposed to any news regarding the MoCo council.

The only reasonable source is Bethesda Beat. Otherwise you’ve got WTOP and WaPo. Your neighborhood listserv is also important.

MoCo Show.

And Montgomery Community Media, which is the government, but it does a good job just reporting facts without all the commentary.

https://www.mymcmedia.org/police-15-year-old-boy-shot-in-montgomery-village/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apologies for the slightly off topic question...but curious what news sources you tend to follow in order to stay abreast of MoCo news. I just moved to the area from Capitol Hill. I did a pretty good job of staying on top of DC Council news, but I feel like I don't get exposed to any news regarding the MoCo council.

The only reasonable source is Bethesda Beat. Otherwise you’ve got WTOP and WaPo. Your neighborhood listserv is also important.

MoCo Show.

And Montgomery Community Media, which is the government, but it does a good job just reporting facts without all the commentary.

https://www.mymcmedia.org/police-15-year-old-boy-shot-in-montgomery-village/

LOL. One is literally state media and the other is what I will nicely call “opinion journalism”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apologies for the slightly off topic question...but curious what news sources you tend to follow in order to stay abreast of MoCo news. I just moved to the area from Capitol Hill. I did a pretty good job of staying on top of DC Council news, but I feel like I don't get exposed to any news regarding the MoCo council.

The only reasonable source is Bethesda Beat. Otherwise you’ve got WTOP and WaPo. Your neighborhood listserv is also important.

MoCo Show.

And Montgomery Community Media, which is the government, but it does a good job just reporting facts without all the commentary.

https://www.mymcmedia.org/police-15-year-old-boy-shot-in-montgomery-village/

LOL. One is literally state media and the other is what I will nicely call “opinion journalism”.

So is BBC and it's way better than anything we have. That's what you get when you let profits rule.