Youngkin and TJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

He, along with many other Democratic school board members, should also be criminally charged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

He, along with many other Democratic school board members, should also be criminally charged.

Hysterical much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

Lisa Williams was primarily responsible for all the “equity based changes” to the TJ admission policies:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1018356.page

FCPS lied about the number of low income students in the class of 2025. They knew that this was self-reported and based on a question that any child could say yes to in if they were reading it literally. They knew that it had nothing to do with if a child was actually low income.

I wonder if part of the reason that she is leaving is due to this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

Opportunity hoarders want all of the good stuff for their own kids and don’t want to share with the poors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

Because it’s not real equity. It’s discrimination (against Asians) in the name of equity. It should be a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

I see the resident DCUM “woke” trolls have shown up.

As pointed out, it is not real equity. Rather, it is anti-Asian racism in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

OMG. You know the answer.

Here is a different example of what your idea of equity leads to:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/police-unions-blame-aclu-smash-and-grab-california

[Anonymous]

Foxnews citing police unions, two groups that are totally trustworthy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

I see the resident DCUM “woke” trolls have shown up.

As pointed out, it is not real equity. Rather, it is anti-Asian racism in this case.

Does "woke" mean wanting to provide true equal opportunities?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

I see the resident DCUM “woke” trolls have shown up.

As pointed out, it is not real equity. Rather, it is anti-Asian racism in this case.

Does "woke" mean wanting to provide true equal opportunities?

No. Woke means you want to treat people differently based on race - in other words, not equally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

Really?!
I'm not sure if you're just plain stupid or you're obnoxious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

I see the resident DCUM “woke” trolls have shown up.

As pointed out, it is not real equity. Rather, it is anti-Asian racism in this case.

Does "woke" mean wanting to provide true equal opportunities?

No. Woke means you want to treat people differently based on race - in other words, not equally.

So how should we address racially disparate outcomes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qarni is fired. That alone makes the vote for Youngkin worth it.

And Lisa Smith is gone. Those would be the two big TJ equity screamers.

What’s wrong with equity?

I see the resident DCUM “woke” trolls have shown up.

As pointed out, it is not real equity. Rather, it is anti-Asian racism in this case.

Does "woke" mean wanting to provide true equal opportunities?

No. Woke means you want to treat people differently based on race - in other words, not equally.

So how should we address racially disparate outcomes?

By saying that everything is fair and pretending the disparities don't exist. You can also push for some vague higher standards or better teaching in the worst off schools, but that's just lip service. What matters is a system in place that can be gamed by those with the resources to do so.