Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

NP. You people realize that Harry and Meghan were the most photographed couple in the world last year, right? Lots of people are interested in them. They don't seem to have to struggle to self promote. Maybe Meghan used to, but those days are long past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They totally planted the rumor themselves about being asked to present at the Oscars. It's so obvious. They're just soooooo desirable lol.

Please. You think the Oscars are above asking them to present but not having Eminem, who hasn’t had a hit song in 10 years, perform?

The Best Picture award is always presented by a previous Oscar winner. This is an embarrassingly pathetic attempt to save face after not being invited – you’d think any normal person who was planning to lie about presenting would have chosen a less prestigious (so more believable) category, but MM has shown us already that she is not very clever.

Pretty sure if Blac Chyna can get an invite they can too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They totally planted the rumor themselves about being asked to present at the Oscars. It's so obvious. They're just soooooo desirable lol.

Please. You think the Oscars are above asking them to present but not having Eminem, who hasn’t had a hit song in 10 years, perform?

The Best Picture award is always presented by a previous Oscar winner. This is an embarrassingly pathetic attempt to save face after not being invited – you’d think any normal person who was planning to lie about presenting would have chosen a less prestigious (so more believable) category, but MM has shown us already that she is not very clever.

She's clever enough to keep you captivated and constantly chattering about her 24/7.

It's only been 5 weeks, she has many decades ahead of her

Do you have many decades ahead of you? The amount of free time you have to respond to every post directed at you suggests you are retired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They totally planted the rumor themselves about being asked to present at the Oscars. It's so obvious. They're just soooooo desirable lol.

Please. You think the Oscars are above asking them to present but not having Eminem, who hasn’t had a hit song in 10 years, perform?

The Best Picture award is always presented by a previous Oscar winner. This is an embarrassingly pathetic attempt to save face after not being invited – you’d think any normal person who was planning to lie about presenting would have chosen a less prestigious (so more believable) category, but MM has shown us already that she is not very clever.

She's clever enough to keep you captivated and constantly chattering about her 24/7.

It's only been 5 weeks, she has many decades ahead of her

Do you have many decades ahead of you? The amount of free time you have to respond to every post directed at you suggests you are retired.

The board is full of posters that share the sentiment, I only wrote the last comment. But since we are here let me expand. This thread popped up a few weeks back, it exploded, and has since died back. A fate that will follow the Markles.

[Anonymous]

I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

[Anonymous]

Oh snap!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

Me too!!!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8018043/Queen-BANS-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-using-Sussex-Royal-brand-cost-thousands.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

Wonder what the new brand will be? Sussex Adrift??

[Anonymous]

“Suck It, Sussex”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

I’m sure they were actually told weeks ago during that Sandringham meeting. They were just provided a period of transition to give them an opportunity to rebrand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

I’m sure they were actually told weeks ago during that Sandringham meeting. They were just provided a period of transition to give them an opportunity to rebrand.

Sussex Campaign

Sussex World

Sussex Fund

Sussex Global

Sussex Collaborative

I like these suggestions from another poster but I get the feeling its going to cost a lot to re-trademark from 'Sussex Royal' to say 'the Sussex Foundation'. It's a simple exclusion of a word but legally all that paperwork needs to be amended and I'm sure their lawyers aren't cheap.

Honestly I wish they'd went with something more personal from the get-go instead of copying the 'Kensington Royal' nickname.

My suggestion would have been the: the Commonwealth Foundation for Good, the H+M Global Initiative etc

Anything that isn't dependent on a title or rank that could be stripped by the Queen or Future Kings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

I’m sure they were actually told weeks ago during that Sandringham meeting. They were just provided a period of transition to give them an opportunity to rebrand.

Sussex Campaign

Sussex World

Sussex Fund

Sussex Global

Sussex Collaborative

I like these suggestions from another poster but I get the feeling its going to cost a lot to re-trademark from 'Sussex Royal' to say 'the Sussex Foundation'. It's a simple exclusion of a word but legally all that paperwork needs to be amended and I'm sure their lawyers aren't cheap.

Honestly I wish they'd went with something more personal from the get-go instead of copying the 'Kensington Royal' nickname.

My suggestion would have been the: the Commonwealth Foundation for Good, the H+M Global Initiative etc

Anything that isn't dependent on a title or rank that could be stripped by the Queen or Future Kings.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

I’m sure they were actually told weeks ago during that Sandringham meeting. They were just provided a period of transition to give them an opportunity to rebrand.

Sussex Campaign

Sussex World

Sussex Fund

Sussex Global

Sussex Collaborative

I like these suggestions from another poster but I get the feeling its going to cost a lot to re-trademark from 'Sussex Royal' to say 'the Sussex Foundation'. It's a simple exclusion of a word but legally all that paperwork needs to be amended and I'm sure their lawyers aren't cheap.

Honestly I wish they'd went with something more personal from the get-go instead of copying the 'Kensington Royal' nickname.

My suggestion would have been the: the Commonwealth Foundation for Good, the H+M Global Initiative etc

Anything that isn't dependent on a title or rank that could be stripped by the Queen or Future Kings.

They never imagined they wouldn't be allowed to do whatever they wanted.

[Anonymous]

Nothing has quite the ring as “royal”. That’s what happens when you put the carriage before the horse.

[Anonymous]

They should just use H&M_Sussex and call it a day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when Meghan found out she couldn’t use “Royal” in her brand.

I’m sure they were actually told weeks ago during that Sandringham meeting. They were just provided a period of transition to give them an opportunity to rebrand.

Ah, to be a fly on the wall at the Sandringham meeting.