Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🚨 BREAKING: The FBI and state agencies have launched investigations into multiple LEFTIST groups in Utah for possible advanced knowledge of the Charlie Kirk assassination, per Axios

They’re also probing whether or not these groups provided material support after the kiIIing

At least one group deactivated their social media pages soon after the shot was taken.

Well, well, well…looks like the governor scared up some new leads after Trump called him. I expect the shooter to have a very Epstein jail experience.

True, if his family cares about him at all, they will look to his safety

But then again, they are MAGA.

And so is he

Oh sure
But he's in jail. Not much he can do about his safety.

Of he's unalived, they can project whatever narrative they wanted.

Look at the job they are doing on Kirk.

What job on Kirk?

Oh, it's St. Charlie now.
They've almost canonized him.

[Anonymous]

Gotta love the fans of that chipmunk whitesplaining his quotes postmortem . Funny stuff, truly .

[Anonymous]

The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think Turning Points is done completely, but without their main figure, they certainly won’t be putting out as much content anymore. Didn’t they sponsor a big meeting/convention every year? I’m sure that will continue, but stuff like the super high profile college visits are going to have to stop for now.

Who is their financial backer anyway ? I'm surprised left leaning sleuths haven't explored this route . A community college drop out doesn't get funding for his hate-filled factory out of thin air .

People keep making this claim, that he was filled. Where is this coming from? All of the clips that I have seen of him uttering “hate filled” comments are obviously taken way out of context when you watch the full videos that the clips they were taken from.

What context will make these quotes not hateful, racist?

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024

I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023

America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025

There is more here in case you need more examples: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs

There is data and studies out on unqualified dei hire’s grades, tests scores, performance, lawsuits. Same with unskilled, uneducated, illiterate illegal immigrants. Same with handgun deaths in every country.

Data and peer reviewed studies are out there. And they’re not OpEds or XYZ Studies surveys or opinion papers.

Why is it so hard to understand that when people assume if you’re black you’re not qualified?

What, their lived experiences?

Most MAGA aren't qualified for $hit


But sure, they "know"

Community college dropouts telling people that went to Harvard that they are DEI hires. Quite the sight to behold.

Another reason why I enjoy seeing his supporters twist themselves like badly baked pretzels trying to explain his quotes. They're telling on themselves .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🚨 BREAKING: The FBI and state agencies have launched investigations into multiple LEFTIST groups in Utah for possible advanced knowledge of the Charlie Kirk assassination, per Axios

They’re also probing whether or not these groups provided material support after the kiIIing

At least one group deactivated their social media pages soon after the shot was taken.

Well, well, well…looks like the governor scared up some new leads after Trump called him. I expect the shooter to have a very Epstein jail experience.

True, if his family cares about him at all, they will look to his safety

But then again, they are MAGA.

And so is he

Oh sure
But he's in jail. Not much he can do about his safety.

Of he's unalived, they can project whatever narrative they wanted.

Look at the job they are doing on Kirk.

+1

I am concerned for his safety. Without him around they can create a narrative of their pleasing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think Turning Points is done completely, but without their main figure, they certainly won’t be putting out as much content anymore. Didn’t they sponsor a big meeting/convention every year? I’m sure that will continue, but stuff like the super high profile college visits are going to have to stop for now.

Who is their financial backer anyway ? I'm surprised left leaning sleuths haven't explored this route . A community college drop out doesn't get funding for his hate-filled factory out of thin air .

People keep making this claim, that he was filled. Where is this coming from? All of the clips that I have seen of him uttering “hate filled” comments are obviously taken way out of context when you watch the full videos that the clips they were taken from.

What context will make these quotes not hateful, racist?

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024

I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023

America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025

There is more here in case you need more examples: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs

There is data and studies out on unqualified dei hire’s grades, tests scores, performance, lawsuits. Same with unskilled, uneducated, illiterate illegal immigrants. Same with handgun deaths in every country.

Data and peer reviewed studies are out there. And they’re not OpEds or XYZ Studies surveys or opinion papers.

Why is it so hard to understand that when people assume if you’re black you’re not qualified?

What, their lived experiences?

Most MAGA aren't qualified for $hit


But sure, they "know"

Community college dropouts telling people that went to Harvard that they are DEI hires. Quite the sight to behold.

Another reason why I enjoy seeing his supporters twist themselves like badly baked pretzels trying to explain his quotes. They're telling on themselves .

Don't do pretzels like that even the lopsided ones are salty goodness!

[Anonymous]

The trans roommate photo looks filtered and he is wearing an animal onesie. Teens do wear these to be funny. This photo could also be at least 5 years old. Where are the photos of the trans roommate, like dressed as a woman. I guess they are being created now.

[Anonymous]

Gasp, he's wearing an animal onesie

1/4 of the kids at my child's school must have been trans on pajama day

[Anonymous]

Lance Twiggs has a deep voice, doesn’t appear to be female at all, wears men’s clothing. He is not trans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”

The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.

It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?

Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.

Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.

Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.

Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.

Well Charlie would still be alive today playing with his babies if we focused more on the above.

+1
You reap what you sow. And the "reaping" isn't always accompanied by good people or a socially palatable method. Reaping doesn't mean deserving, it means natural, unsurprising consequence, note the distinction.

Not sure what country or time period you live in but in NO ONE’s law book, govt, or faith is it “natural and unsurprising” to unilaterally decide shoot someone down for what they have said in public forums. Or private ones.

That’s anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, not to mention unethical, illegal and immoral in most religions and societies.

— Note the distinction of your illogic and falsities. And zero understanding of due process.

You are missing the point. I was not saying violence is legal, moral, or justified. I was saying it can be a predictable consequence. “Reaping what you sow” in that context means unsurprising outcome, not rightful punishment. Condemning the act as illegal or immoral is valid, but it does not address the claim of inevitability.

Nope. Shooting down a politician or activist is not a “predictable consequence” nor “unsurprising outcome” nor “inevitability” of them being a vocal politician or activist.

Get professional help Pp.

In a country where uncivilized politicians enact wil wild West style gun laws, shooting down a politician is a predictable consequence , indeed. Facts don't care about your fragile and hypocritical feelings .

Speaking of facts, what you cited - shooting down a politician - is indeed extremely rare in America and most countries.

Plus Charlie Kirk was quite civilized when he spoke. That was his model- or else it wouldn’t work, watch the shows.

Thanks for playing, better luck next time!

In one episode of his podcast, Kirk suggested that children should be forced to watch Trump’s political opponents beheaded live on television. With sponsorship by Coca-Cola.

That doesn’t sound very civilized.

Context and link?

Look it up yourself. If you don't find the poster credible in context that is your problem.

Dude, who would? You just wrote 25-30 words.

How dumb do you think people are?

Information has been provided. Up to you what you do with it.

Correct, after multiple posters called out your petty nonresponses, you finally posted a transcript link.

We’ll watch it full in due course and revert back with our thoughts.

No, the request for sources is a petty rhetorical technique to dismiss the poster. And no, you are not going to watch the video because that was never the point.

What you might do is find an excuse to dismiss it outright, to further dismiss the credibility of the poster.

Excuse me? Who wouldn’t want to look at the source material and think for themselves on the matter?

Why would anyone just read a stranger’s opinion tweet and run with it?

Plus half of the country is illiterate.

Funny how nobody’s commented on what CK said, in his own words, on the transcript. They’re just attacking the messenger.

Didn’t they say they’d read it over and revert back? Maybe they have a life or are having sex in a Saturday night. Unlike us.

It takes all of thirty seconds to read. I read it. My reaction: PP was correct that in this segment of the podcast, Kirk was advocating for making children watch televised executions. And that is a horrifying opinion.

There, that wasn’t so hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🚨 BREAKING: The FBI and state agencies have launched investigations into multiple LEFTIST groups in Utah for possible advanced knowledge of the Charlie Kirk assassination, per Axios

They’re also probing whether or not these groups provided material support after the kiIIing

At least one group deactivated their social media pages soon after the shot was taken.

Well, well, well…looks like the governor scared up some new leads after Trump called him. I expect the shooter to have a very Epstein jail experience.

You mean for the social media groups who knew ahead of time about the murder or provided on the ground help or money? If they were accomplices?
Yes they will be charged conspirators and serve time.

[Anonymous]

Trans and gay don’t necessarily equate to left wing. The alt right is full of gay/trans people - think Milo Yiannopolous, Caitlyn Jenner, Peter Thiel, the French guy who coined the Great Replacement theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think Turning Points is done completely, but without their main figure, they certainly won’t be putting out as much content anymore. Didn’t they sponsor a big meeting/convention every year? I’m sure that will continue, but stuff like the super high profile college visits are going to have to stop for now.

Who is their financial backer anyway ? I'm surprised left leaning sleuths haven't explored this route . A community college drop out doesn't get funding for his hate-filled factory out of thin air .

People keep making this claim, that he was filled. Where is this coming from? All of the clips that I have seen of him uttering “hate filled” comments are obviously taken way out of context when you watch the full videos that the clips they were taken from.

What context will make these quotes not hateful, racist?

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024

I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023

America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025

There is more here in case you need more examples: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs

There is data and studies out on unqualified dei hire’s grades, tests scores, performance, lawsuits. Same with unskilled, uneducated, illiterate illegal immigrants. Same with handgun deaths in every country.

Data and peer reviewed studies are out there. And they’re not OpEds or XYZ Studies surveys or opinion papers.

Why is it so hard to understand that when people assume if you’re black you’re not qualified?

What, their lived experiences?

Most MAGA aren't qualified for $hit


But sure, they "know"

At some age or IQ or common sense level yes, you can identify when someone is doing their job well or not. Whether it be a McD’s service worker, construction person, advisor, teacher or doctor. Half the time their attitude and speaking ability demonstrates their ability level ahead of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?

I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?

I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday? [/quote
This article says that it was confirmed by the FBI officials that are interviewing his transsexual partner

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html