Stop the FCV (DA) and McLean (ECNL) hate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Yes. Anyone can learn boom ball later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Europeans are here the Europeans are here. Meanwhile, the US kicks their ass on the women’s side every time. Go back to your homeland homie.

Lol. Such ignorance and arrogance.

The USMNT play essentially the same style as our women’s. How is that working out on the world stage against professionally trained men? Our women’s team played against mostly armatures in group stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

You sound like you learned from soccer books.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

You sound like you learned from soccer books.

Or playing my entire life, as opposed to just watching my kids play.

[Anonymous]

FCV is not known for developing midfielders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV is not known for developing midfielders

Bingo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

You sound like you learned from soccer books.

Or playing my entire life, as opposed to just watching my kids play.

Did you play in a strategically placed midfield?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV is not known for developing midfielders

Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

You sound like you learned from soccer books.

Or playing my entire life, as opposed to just watching my kids play.

Did you play in a strategically placed midfield?

All midfield are strategically placed. You still don't get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/s3PcdKdbkVU

Watched much of that game and I never saw that boom ball that is such a strategic play.

So clubs should do what Barcelona does?

Should U16 teams be coached the same way as U9’s? Are you saying the hall has to go gk to defenders to midfielders to forwards every time? Hopefully you’re as good at tactics as you are at YouTube.

Every time? No one has said every time. A large portion of time? Yes, the best teams have a strong midfield that is deeply involved in the play and is so obviously strategically placed, I'm in awe that this is a point of confusion.

What part of the field? In what phase of the game? Is this building from the back or in transition? 3 strikers or 2? 3 midfielders or 4?

All of those. If you have two strikers, it's general done to increase your midfield presence.

So defenders should play directly into midfielders all the time, coach?

So binary. You think anyone said always? Smh, you sound like you never played.

You sound like you learned from soccer books.

Hilariously you’ve made the best argument against yourself. “Breaking lines” IS textbook. No matter, feel free to call launching a ball into a 50/50 situation “breaking lines” all you want. Intentionally creating 50/50 or worse situations after already having possession is not good soccer no matter what textbook words you place on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Europeans are here the Europeans are here. Meanwhile, the US kicks their ass on the women’s side every time. Go back to your homeland homie.

Lol. Such ignorance and arrogance.

The USMNT play essentially the same style as our women’s. How is that working out on the world stage against professionally trained men? Our women’s team played against mostly armatures in group stage.

You’re the one being arrogant. You believe in your own beliefs more than facts and actual results. Who cares about group stage? They won the World Cup AGAIN, beating the best PROS Europe could offer. It is a simple fact buddy. You can’t deny it. As far as the men you’re right we suck. But it is not due to the brand of soccer we play, it is due to the poor players we field. This is proven by your own statement that the WNT plays the same style as the MNT, yet the women win at all very frequently while the men can’t compete. The difference is the PLAYERS. Yes, maybe someday a European team will consistently field a group of players that can consistently beat the USWNT. But in the last 20 years, that hasn’t happened, and it won’t for at least another 10. Now, buy your plane ticket and go back to the Old Country, we don’t want your snobby, arrogant, soccer-elitist ass here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV is not known for developing midfielders

Cite your source of facts please. Also, who is known for this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Europeans are here the Europeans are here. Meanwhile, the US kicks their ass on the women’s side every time. Go back to your homeland homie.

Lol. Such ignorance and arrogance.

The USMNT play essentially the same style as our women’s. How is that working out on the world stage against professionally trained men? Our women’s team played against mostly armatures in group stage.

You’re the one being arrogant. You believe in your own beliefs more than facts and actual results. Who cares about group stage? They won the World Cup AGAIN, beating the best PROS Europe could offer. It is a simple fact buddy. You can’t deny it. As far as the men you’re right we suck. But it is not due to the brand of soccer we play, it is due to the poor players we field. This is proven by your own statement that the WNT plays the same style as the MNT, yet the women win at all very frequently while the men can’t compete. The difference is the PLAYERS. Yes, maybe someday a European team will consistently field a group of players that can consistently beat the USWNT. But in the last 20 years, that hasn’t happened, and it won’t for at least another 10. Now, buy your plane ticket and go back to the Old Country, we don’t want your snobby, arrogant, soccer-elitist ass here.

Says the guy that cheers “great kick” when his kids team kicks the ball REALLY hard or REALLY far.

[Anonymous]

^this. Or yells "send it"