Why are younger men so right wing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp

No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.

That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.

Do you care about the women in Loudoun county that were raped by anyone other than a trans person? Were there any? Probably not, right? I don’t think it ever happens.

It’s so telling how people like you are are entirely unable to stay on topic. Because you have no logical arguments to make.

It’s deflect deflect deflect with whataboutism in every single comment.

What about gun control?
What about women who are raped?
What about Epstein?
What about Trump being a bad guy?

Young Men are simply tired of having to pretend that humans can change their sex.

It's so telling that you commit one fraudulent fallacy after another, base rate neglect, refusal to acknowledge the far bigger and far more legitimate concerns of others and so on. Not to mention that the core of your whole argument about trans people being a threat to women hinges on a story about a Loudoun County kid who wasn't even trans to begin with. This isn't being dismissive, or minimizing legitimate concerns, it's about calling out your outright lies and bullshit.

I have not mentioned loudon.

My argument is evolution and biology. No xx will ever be xy.

You know not everyone is xx or xy, right? Pesky biology, making things hard.

Gender identity is not related to the tiny segment of the population that suffers from sex chromosome anomalies.

Again, unwillingness to stay on topic.

Because everyone knows xx can’t become xy and men can’t become women; so your argument is simply for abolishing protections for women.

Stay on topic?
Frankly I don't even see how your injection of your fringe hysteria about transwomen was ever on topic in the first place.

You're the one who's off topic. If you want to convince me otherwise then show some polling of young right wing males showing trans issues to be the top driver of why they are the way they are.

Americans of all ages are tiring of trans nonsense.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/02/26/americans-have-grown-more-supportive-of-restrictions-for-trans-people-in-recent-years/

That poll doesn't answer the question. They may be "tiring of it" but the question posed to you was how it ranks in terms of other issues - like the economy, gun violence, healthcare, and so on. Try again.

No.

Men are right wing for a variety of reasons.

Trans is one of them.

You are free to make your own case about the economy, guns (?) or health care. Because as we have seen you unwilling and unable to focus on the trans issue. Which is actually smart, since it’s a losing issue for you.

I guess the only argument you think you can win on is by harping on transwomen and continuing to peddle hysteria about non-trans teenagers in bathrooms, and even that one's not going so well. Not the economy, not healthcare, not guns... That doesn't bode well for Republicans in 2026 and 2028.

Funny, that’s exactly what you said about the trans issue and Trump in 2024.

Meanwhile Trump won the election based on a they/them ad message.

Can’t wait to see how 2028 turns out when the Dems refuse to course correct.

Hey good for you. Keep on ignoring the fact that Trump is sliding toward 38% in the polls and keep telling yourself about how much he's winning. Bad polls are good news! Losing is winning! Up is down! Down is up!

The only people less popular than Trump are his democratic rivals. Go look at some polls and you'll see why the pp made that comment. As much as people hate MAGA, they don't hate it as much as they hate the left.

I theorize this is why Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes are suddenly everywhere. Their voices are probably being artificially propped up so that people hear as much crazy talk coming from the right as from the left.

Conservatives have won the media war of lying.

Media has capitualted to Don the con for zero reason the fools.

Best ever yesterday Truth Social actually got truth posted LOL

MAGA is so dumb.

[Anonymous]

Young men are not right wing in mass.

Trump's approval rate is tanking.

Speical Elections show us this plus polling.

Trump won because people did not vote not because Americans wanted a dictator and now it is too late there is no going back. King trump can not leave office ever and he and his sycophants know that.

MAGA won't read Jack Smiths words that are out today because they are a cult of anti american KKK garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Young men are not right wing in mass.

Trump's approval rate is tanking.

Speical Elections show us this plus polling.

Trump won because people did not vote not because Americans wanted a dictator and now it is too late there is no going back. King trump can not leave office ever and he and his sycophants know that.

MAGA won't read Jack Smiths words that are out today because they are a cult of anti american KKK garbage.

Jack Smith is going to make a great AG or SCJ.

[Anonymous]

The way I see it, conservatives are attacking women's rights, but liberals are not behind at all!
Keep men out of women's private spaces and out of our sports! If all was the same, why did we fight for women to compete?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No real man is liberal.

They can’t be. They have actively villainized masculinity for the better part of two decades.
And if—as the lefts tells you all day long — “representation matters” then it might be a good idea of someone on the left would start realizing that demonizing masculine traits in men makes men who have those natural traits feel undervalued and marginalized by what is supposed to be their own party.

Try naming five examples of a masculine democrat male leader in n politics and you’ll see what I mean.

Young men feel abandoned by the left. It’s not that difficult to decipher.
But instead you’d rather demonize him or infantilize him by imagining that he’s gone crazy or is ignorant. He is neither. He just doesn’t buy into hating himself for having natural male traits like ambition, competitiveness, and physical strength. He also might like the idea that one should be rewarded for his own work output capitalist model of America that the left seems to abhor right now.

Likely not impressed by republican leaders. Trump and Vance are not masculine men, Pence is weird, and Obama and Walz definitely are masculine men and strong family men so this argument falls apart just at the recent presidential level.

There is a lot of marketing towards men from the right and kids want to be counter cultural to their parents. Plus as the previous poster said, they likely haven't struggled much. If they are a good person they at least know that many on the right in politics are not speaking in a positive way. You can have conservative values and still hate the political fighting, insults, and lies. There are conservatives that still hated Rush Limbaugh and his kind.

If you think the bolded, you have no idea what masculine means.

He grew up playing football and basketball, hunted as a kid and to this day. Worked in a factory before college. Veteran. Football coach. Father of 2.

What makes someone masculine in your eyes? UFC spandex and roids?

Vance is literally a combat veteran of the Marines. Walz never deployed in any meaningful sense. As a female vet, I don't think you can say Vance is not masculine but then cite Walz's military record. My own service record is more masculine than Walz's. Walz is a liberal white woman's idea of masculine for sure, but he reads as too "pick me" to conservatives or males.

JD Vance is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps who served as a combat correspondent during the Iraq War, but he did not see direct combat. He was deployed to Iraq for six months in 2005, where he documented military activities rather than engaging in combat operations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No real man is liberal.

They can’t be. They have actively villainized masculinity for the better part of two decades.
And if—as the lefts tells you all day long — “representation matters” then it might be a good idea of someone on the left would start realizing that demonizing masculine traits in men makes men who have those natural traits feel undervalued and marginalized by what is supposed to be their own party.

Try naming five examples of a masculine democrat male leader in n politics and you’ll see what I mean.

Young men feel abandoned by the left. It’s not that difficult to decipher.
But instead you’d rather demonize him or infantilize him by imagining that he’s gone crazy or is ignorant. He is neither. He just doesn’t buy into hating himself for having natural male traits like ambition, competitiveness, and physical strength. He also might like the idea that one should be rewarded for his own work output capitalist model of America that the left seems to abhor right now.

Likely not impressed by republican leaders. Trump and Vance are not masculine men, Pence is weird, and Obama and Walz definitely are masculine men and strong family men so this argument falls apart just at the recent presidential level.

There is a lot of marketing towards men from the right and kids want to be counter cultural to their parents. Plus as the previous poster said, they likely haven't struggled much. If they are a good person they at least know that many on the right in politics are not speaking in a positive way. You can have conservative values and still hate the political fighting, insults, and lies. There are conservatives that still hated Rush Limbaugh and his kind.

If you think the bolded, you have no idea what masculine means.

He grew up playing football and basketball, hunted as a kid and to this day. Worked in a factory before college. Veteran. Football coach. Father of 2.

What makes someone masculine in your eyes? UFC spandex and roids?

Vance is literally a combat veteran of the Marines. Walz never deployed in any meaningful sense. As a female vet, I don't think you can say Vance is not masculine but then cite Walz's military record. My own service record is more masculine than Walz's. Walz is a liberal white woman's idea of masculine for sure, but he reads as too "pick me" to conservatives or males.

JD Vance is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps who served as a combat correspondent during the Iraq War, but he did not see direct combat. He was deployed to Iraq for six months in 2005, where he documented military activities rather than engaging in combat operations

Vance and Walz have reached their political career ceilings due to their associations with very unpopular political times and their associations with very unpopular politicians of these times. Masculinity means less than who you associate with.

[Anonymous]

Younger men engage in life when they see there is a sustainable future path for them.

For example, if they decide to invest in a career, they want to have some assurance that that their government will not be okay with using their tax money to write checks to criminals. There appears to be zero accountability on that front--the childless childcare industry in MN and other states is just the tip of the iceberg.

[Anonymous]

There isn’t childless childcare in Minnesota. You are falling for yet another right wing trope.

Yes there was some fraud. The investigations began under Biden. 70 of the 78 arrests happened under Biden. It was a white woman, not Somalis, responsible for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t childless childcare in Minnesota. You are falling for yet another right wing trope.

Yes there was some fraud. The investigations began under Biden. 70 of the 78 arrests happened under Biden. It was a white woman, not Somalis, responsible for this.

It's not happening.
It's kind of happening.
It's happening, it's okay and here's why it's okay.
maga freaking out about it happening is the real problem.

[Anonymous]

Young men aren’t so right wing, Democrats keeps shifting further and further left while trying their best to leave young men behind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t childless childcare in Minnesota. You are falling for yet another right wing trope.

Yes there was some fraud. The investigations began under Biden. 70 of the 78 arrests happened under Biden. It was a white woman, not Somalis, responsible for this.

It's not happening.
It's kind of happening.
It's happening, it's okay and here's why it's okay.
maga freaking out about it happening is the real problem.

I don't understand the left's play here. It is so obviously happening and theres thousands of hours of video to back it up, only growing more each day. There are spokesmen spouting balf faced lies that are proven wrong the moment they speak them. There are 3 dozen fighting age males loitering in front of the "Learing Center" right now. On a federal holiday. Why? It's not a day care.

So the left thinks they can just deny it and it goes away. It doesnt work like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Young men aren’t so right wing, Democrats keeps shifting further and further left while trying their best to leave young men behind.

Who are the democrats in power that keep shofting to the left?

Both Harris and Biden are main stream democrats who grow the economy, create jobs and provide a social safety net. You all keep going on about this leftward shift, but the reality is the GOP went from the party of Reagan to some authoritarian neofascist ethno Christian mess that has Reagan spinning in his grave. Meanwhile the mainstream of the democrats are generally no different than FDR or Bill Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t childless childcare in Minnesota. You are falling for yet another right wing trope.

Yes there was some fraud. The investigations began under Biden. 70 of the 78 arrests happened under Biden. It was a white woman, not Somalis, responsible for this.

It's not happening.
It's kind of happening.
It's happening, it's okay and here's why it's okay.
maga freaking out about it happening is the real problem.

I don't understand the left's play here. It is so obviously happening and theres thousands of hours of video to back it up, only growing more each day. There are spokesmen spouting balf faced lies that are proven wrong the moment they speak them. There are 3 dozen fighting age males loitering in front of the "Learing Center" right now. On a federal holiday. Why? It's not a day care.

So the left thinks they can just deny it and it goes away. It doesnt work like that.

What are you even talking about? I posted above, the investigation into this started under Biden. Most of the prosecutions happened under Biden. The right is trying to Pizzagate this. There is a reason day care centers don't let random masked men into their facilities.

No one said it didn't happen. It did. Biden's DOJ prosecuted it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No real man is liberal.

They can’t be. They have actively villainized masculinity for the better part of two decades.
And if—as the lefts tells you all day long — “representation matters” then it might be a good idea of someone on the left would start realizing that demonizing masculine traits in men makes men who have those natural traits feel undervalued and marginalized by what is supposed to be their own party.

Try naming five examples of a masculine democrat male leader in n politics and you’ll see what I mean.

Young men feel abandoned by the left. It’s not that difficult to decipher.
But instead you’d rather demonize him or infantilize him by imagining that he’s gone crazy or is ignorant. He is neither. He just doesn’t buy into hating himself for having natural male traits like ambition, competitiveness, and physical strength. He also might like the idea that one should be rewarded for his own work output capitalist model of America that the left seems to abhor right now.

Likely not impressed by republican leaders. Trump and Vance are not masculine men, Pence is weird, and Obama and Walz definitely are masculine men and strong family men so this argument falls apart just at the recent presidential level.

There is a lot of marketing towards men from the right and kids want to be counter cultural to their parents. Plus as the previous poster said, they likely haven't struggled much. If they are a good person they at least know that many on the right in politics are not speaking in a positive way. You can have conservative values and still hate the political fighting, insults, and lies. There are conservatives that still hated Rush Limbaugh and his kind.

If you think the bolded, you have no idea what masculine means.

He grew up playing football and basketball, hunted as a kid and to this day. Worked in a factory before college. Veteran. Football coach. Father of 2.

What makes someone masculine in your eyes? UFC spandex and roids?

Vance is literally a combat veteran of the Marines. Walz never deployed in any meaningful sense. As a female vet, I don't think you can say Vance is not masculine but then cite Walz's military record. My own service record is more masculine than Walz's. Walz is a liberal white woman's idea of masculine for sure, but he reads as too "pick me" to conservatives or males.

JD Vance is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps who served as a combat correspondent during the Iraq War, but he did not see direct combat. He was deployed to Iraq for six months in 2005, where he documented military activities rather than engaging in combat operations

Vance and Walz have reached their political career ceilings due to their associations with very unpopular political times and their associations with very unpopular politicians of these times. Masculinity means less than who you associate with.

Polymarket bets have JD winning by a large margin. It's obviously extremely early but I wouldn't be so sure that he's not a contender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t childless childcare in Minnesota. You are falling for yet another right wing trope.

Yes there was some fraud. The investigations began under Biden. 70 of the 78 arrests happened under Biden. It was a white woman, not Somalis, responsible for this.

It's not happening.
It's kind of happening.
It's happening, it's okay and here's why it's okay.
maga freaking out about it happening is the real problem.

I don't understand the left's play here. It is so obviously happening and theres thousands of hours of video to back it up, only growing more each day. There are spokesmen spouting balf faced lies that are proven wrong the moment they speak them. There are 3 dozen fighting age males loitering in front of the "Learing Center" right now. On a federal holiday. Why? It's not a day care.

So the left thinks they can just deny it and it goes away. It doesnt work like that.

https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-minnesota-child-care-fraud-propaganda

Fraud is a national problem, and cases in Minnesota have been under federal and state investigation for years. So why is it suddenly a national issue?

It's a case study in the power of the right's propaganda machine.