Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This kills the case against Trump.

Yep. Only an illogical overly emotional person can’t see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

This report was Hur’s audition in front of Trump for a SC nomination. He’s proven himself to be a good little foot soldier. Plus, Trump would love to claim “I nominated the first Asian to the SC!”

I’m still shocked that f#cking Garland picked such a nakedly blatant politico to be the Special Counsel. Hur has never signaled political independence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

This report was Hur’s audition in front of Trump for a SC nomination. He’s proven himself to be a good little foot soldier. Plus, Trump would love to claim “I nominated the first Asian to the SC!”

I’m still shocked that f#cking Garland picked such a nakedly blatant politico to be the Special Counsel. Hur has never signaled political independence.

Totally agree - and think Hurt has ensured he will never get all the votes he needs to be a SCJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who claim he is in cognitive decline are justified in making that claim......

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

This report was Hur’s audition in front of Trump for a SC nomination. He’s proven himself to be a good little foot soldier. Plus, Trump would love to claim “I nominated the first Asian to the SC!”

I’m still shocked that f#cking Garland picked such a nakedly blatant politico to be the Special Counsel. Hur has never signaled political independence.

Totally agree - and think Hurt has ensured he will never get all the votes he needs to be a SCJ.

Quite the opposite, If trump win and the GOP takes the Senate, then the Senate will be craven enough to support Hur replacing Thomas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This kills the case against Trump.

Wrong.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

+1

They were quite germane given that was his reasoning for not charging him.

Bullshit. The report gave the reasons. Hur just smeared Biden so he won’t get kicked out of the Republican patronage network.

You’re pathetic. This came from Biden’s DOJ. The 25th Amendment needs to be invoked.

+1
Merrick Garland, darling of the left, *assigned* this to Hur. Democrats just can't bear to hear the truth.

MG is a registered Republican

Oh! I didn’t realize that. Well, I guess Biden is actually super sharp, then. Thanks for explaining!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

So Obama was wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

This report was Hur’s audition in front of Trump for a SC nomination. He’s proven himself to be a good little foot soldier. Plus, Trump would love to claim “I nominated the first Asian to the SC!”

I’m still shocked that f#cking Garland picked such a nakedly blatant politico to be the Special Counsel. Hur has never signaled political independence.

Totally agree - and think Hurt has ensured he will never get all the votes he needs to be a SCJ.

Quite the opposite, If trump win and the GOP takes the Senate, then the Senate will be craven enough to support Hur replacing Thomas.

Yea true but I doubt they will given their massacre of women’s reproductive rights … many women are furious …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional.

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.

Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land

Big plus one - I think he severely damaged his own reputation and has show. He was not fit for Supreme Court job he aspired to.

So Obama was wrong?

Talking about Hurr not MG here

[Anonymous]

To the people claiming Garland is a Republican, if true, I would add this up there as conclusive evidence that Biden is senile - who would put a member of the opposition party in charge of their own DOJ????? Talk about cognitive decline . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the people claiming Garland is a Republican, if true, I would add this up there as conclusive evidence that Biden is senile - who would put a member of the opposition party in charge of their own DOJ????? Talk about cognitive decline . . .

Garland isn't a republican. He has always been a centrist, which is why it was so shocking to see McConnell such a craven power grab.

[Anonymous]

I guess she is too senile to be viable too, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the people claiming Garland is a Republican, if true, I would add this up there as conclusive evidence that Biden is senile - who would put a member of the opposition party in charge of their own DOJ????? Talk about cognitive decline . . .

Because democrats are rank partisan aholes.
I know this is hard for dickheads like you to understand but give it a try
Democrats value bipartisanship. Their voters want them to come to consensus. They want them to reach across the aisle.
You don’t understand because democrats are fundamentally good people.

DP - did you mean GOP in the first line?

I have been thinking about your latter point recently: Dems really seem to try much harder to find compromise candidates that both sides can live with and to further bipartisan work as much as possible.

I do think many GOP are good people also but the military warfare approach to politics that military historian Newt Gingrich introduced in the late 90s and zeros has become gradually more extreme .

Many people want to see Congress much more functional and bipartisan rather than cheap point scoring and attack dog mode.

Yeah sorry- Should read AREN’T RANK PARTISAN AHOLES.
but you caught my drift.