Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

???

What is Unit 8200?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sigh.

Comrade Trollski now wants you to believe Russia did not drop tens of thousands of barrel bombs on Syrian civilians in a war far from Russia’s borders.

Europe will be so much better off once the Putin regime collapses.

The Hague awaits, Vlad.

Look how close to our military bases they've put their country!! Aggressors!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Oh look it’s you again! Hello there!

Still repeating the same ol’ same ol’?! Don’t you ever get bored with it all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Oh look it’s you again! Hello there!

Still repeating the same ol’ same ol’?! Don’t you ever get bored with it all?

LOL like you're original?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Why is everything such a smooth-brained oversimplification to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Oh look it’s you again! Hello there!

Still repeating the same ol’ same ol’?! Don’t you ever get bored with it all?

He is Comrade Trollski, an underpaid member of the Russian Troll Army.

But at least he gets out of mobilization this way (for now).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Russia has successfully accomplished is proving to the world they are more like ISIS than other civilizations.

I do not see them ever being taken seriously for 2-3 generations, if ever.

.

Beheading POWs on video is pretty standard for Russians and ISIS.

If the west could get rid of Russia as easily it did of ISIS the world we be such a better place.

They were able to get rid of ISIS because we worked with Russia and made sure we weren't fighting each other.
To get rid of Russia, we'd probably have to work with people who agree with ISIS.
We kind of did that in Syria too, protecting areas occupied by Al-Qaeda.

No.

ISIS existed due to the puppet regimes in Syria and Iran; the US opened the door in Iraq for it to flourish.

The US could have easily wiped ISIS out but Russia backing a totally evil dictator in Syria required the US to choose between the lesser of two evils.

Pretty much; Russia is just a non-Muslim version of the same evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Russia has successfully accomplished is proving to the world they are more like ISIS than other civilizations.

I do not see them ever being taken seriously for 2-3 generations, if ever.

.

Beheading POWs on video is pretty standard for Russians and ISIS.

If the west could get rid of Russia as easily it did of ISIS the world we be such a better place.

They were able to get rid of ISIS because we worked with Russia and made sure we weren't fighting each other.
To get rid of Russia, we'd probably have to work with people who agree with ISIS.
We kind of did that in Syria too, protecting areas occupied by Al-Qaeda.

No.

ISIS existed due to the puppet regimes in Syria and Iran; the US opened the door in Iraq for it to flourish.

The US could have easily wiped ISIS out but Russia backing a totally evil dictator in Syria required the US to choose between the lesser of two evils.

Pretty much; Russia is just a non-Muslim version of the same evil.

And with the horrific videos of Russian troops latest war crimes of beheading captured Ukrainian POWs alive, Russia has proven itself to basically be ISIS.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/12/russia-ukraine-beheading-videos-wagner-group-conscription-war-crimes-putin/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Russia has successfully accomplished is proving to the world they are more like ISIS than other civilizations.

I do not see them ever being taken seriously for 2-3 generations, if ever.

.

Beheading POWs on video is pretty standard for Russians and ISIS.

If the west could get rid of Russia as easily it did of ISIS the world we be such a better place.

They were able to get rid of ISIS because we worked with Russia and made sure we weren't fighting each other.
To get rid of Russia, we'd probably have to work with people who agree with ISIS.
We kind of did that in Syria too, protecting areas occupied by Al-Qaeda.

No.

ISIS existed due to the puppet regimes in Syria and Iran; the US opened the door in Iraq for it to flourish.

The US could have easily wiped ISIS out but Russia backing a totally evil dictator in Syria required the US to choose between the lesser of two evils.

Pretty much; Russia is just a non-Muslim version of the same evil.

The US was perfectly fine with ISIS for as long as it undermined Bashar Assad and the Iranian regime. Anything to prevent the rise of the Shia Crescent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Why is everything such a smooth-brained oversimplification to you?

All the better to cut your bullshit with!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

Glad to see you're back Unit 8200. Hope things have calmed down on the domestic front for you.

Abolishing NATO would also bring peace, and not just peace in this current conflict. Might as well remove US troops from all occupied territories, like Syria, and turn over Bush/Cheney to the Hague as well as a good will gesture.

'
Abolishing NATO would bring Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Moldova. Russia has already shown it cannot be trusted.

I thought you said their army is obsolete, underresourced and unmotivated? What are they going to war with, pickle jars?

Why is everything such a smooth-brained oversimplification to you?

All the better to cut your bullshit with!

The destroyed bullshit and failure was entirely yours.

[Anonymous]

There's now renewed fighting between Azerbaijan and Armenia and they both know Russia now lacks any military capability to serve as "peacekeeper" in that conflict.

https://www.newsweek.com/firefight-azerbaijan-armenia-border-may-spell-bad-news-putin-1794060

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: . . .
Is the US worried Zelensky might be working on a peace-deal without their permission?

Everyone knows the conditions for peace are simple, reasonable, clear, and so easily achieved:

- Russia must return all of the illegally-invaded territory, meaning the Crimea, DonBass, etc,

- Russia must give up its entire nuclear arsenal,

- Ukraine must be allowed to de-Nazify Russia, and

- Putin must surrender to The Hague pursuant to the legal warrant for his arrest and trial.

Once these reasonable and simple conditions are met, there will be peace.

Doesn’t Russia want peace?

"Jim Parkinson - stooge propagandist for Putin"

Eff off, troll.