Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know, you all should probably head back over to web sleuths where the "serious" discussions are being had. Because every time you come here, the thread devolves into a hillbilly hatefest which gets really nauseating for the regulars of the site.

+ a billion

[Anonymous]

I could not bring myself to watch the 20/20 program. And the voicemail is absolutely chilling. The whole thing is horrific. I cannot understand how something so needless and cruel could happen. I hope justice is served and swiftly. Those poor poor people just living their lives. The family photos on the funeral home website page are warm and wonderful. I hope their friends and family are able to remember them that way and not purely by the horror of their last hours.

[Anonymous]

I am eager to see an example of a "hillbilly hatefest"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I could not bring myself to watch the 20/20 program. And the voicemail is absolutely chilling. The whole thing is horrific. I cannot understand how something so needless and cruel could happen. I hope justice is served and swiftly. Those poor poor people just living their lives. The family photos on the funeral home website page are warm and wonderful. I hope their friends and family are able to remember them that way and not purely by the horror of their last hours.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These " behaviors" and the crime. It is something...right???

IMO, not necessarily. There could be some vast conspiracy involved, or it could just be the simplest explanation: a single lunatic (with his fellow lunatic family member?) who was harboring a grudge decided he wanted to get rich fast and staged the invasion. Alone? With help? Still so many unanswered questions.

Justice can't come fast enough. What a sick despicable excuse for a human.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of the discussion--or at least the interest in the discussion--has moved to the websleuths web site, which appears to have lots of people who more seriously focus on this kind of armchair detective work. And without the DCUM distracting elements of snarkiness that can sometimes emerge.
Second, there's endless speculation on the driver, but really nothing new to go on, just lots of back and forth speculation on "JW" and potential involvement. For my part I am losing interest in the discussion due to the lack of any real updates and am hoping that law enforcement will soon reveal more of what they know.

I think all the suspicions about JW are a side show/distraction. I don't think he was involved in anything. He had a new job he liked with a nice boss who let him drive some sweet cars and he liked to brag about the new gig a bit on social media. Why risk that? Maybe he lied to police before he was aware of the gravity of the situation because he thought he needed to to protect his boss (all that cash?) or himself if he thought he screwed something up.

[Anonymous]

LOLZ Hillbilly Hatefest - there is a lot of that in these here parts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

'Exposing and disciplining' a judge sounds like veiled threat. Assuming you are not in official position to legitimately do any of this--I just wonder how you would propose to 'discipline' a judge for executing a legal sentence. Go ahead, the Justice Department would love to hear it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know, you all should probably head back over to web sleuths where the "serious" discussions are being had. Because every time you come here, the thread devolves into a hillbilly hatefest which gets really nauseating for the regulars of the site.

If this is my "friend ", you remind me of a snowman in snow globe. If not, I truly apologize. You would have to know understand the snarkiness, rude comments of ONE person on this thread.

The rest of you continue to post your insightful comments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

'Exposing and disciplining' a judge sounds like veiled threat. Assuming you are not in official position to legitimately do any of this--I just wonder how you would propose to 'discipline' a judge for executing a legal sentence. Go ahead, the Justice Department would love to hear it.

Not a part of this conversation, but just read this exchange, and you are WAY overreacting. I read no threat, veiled or otherwise, in the PPs comment. It was quite clear to me that PP meant the judge should be "exposed and disciplined" by someone in an official position with the authority to do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

'Exposing and disciplining' a judge sounds like veiled threat. Assuming you are not in official position to legitimately do any of this--I just wonder how you would propose to 'discipline' a judge for executing a legal sentence. Go ahead, the Justice Department would love to hear it.

Np here.

Previous poster you are a bully and you are the only one threatening anything on this post. As a whistle blower, I resent your attempt to stifle the previous poster. Your attempt to shut down criticism of authority figures with invalid threats is out of line. Who the hell are you? The previous poster didn't threaten anyone other than with what I assume is public exposure. Whether it be bad cops, bad judges, bad lawyers, whatever the truth is everyone has a camera and many people in this country are in a mood to reveal these people to public shame. This judge, and others, should be shamed for the piss poor decisions when they're made.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

'Exposing and disciplining' a judge sounds like veiled threat. Assuming you are not in official position to legitimately do any of this--I just wonder how you would propose to 'discipline' a judge for executing a legal sentence. Go ahead, the Justice Department would love to hear it.

Hillbilly from DOJ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Wint was roaming free on the streets of America after being convicted of multiple violent crimes including 3 stabbings documented in the ABC news story should be a massive scandal. Our criminal justice system needs to be much tougher on crime. If more prisons need to be built, so be it. The judge who gave him 89 days after his second-offense stabbing should be publicly exposes and disciplined for incompetence.

You should be careful what you say about judges. Specifically by name. And members of the bar. You should just be very careful. Of course you can disagree with rulings, etc., but when you start to attack someone's competence--you should really stop altogether. Especially in a federal case, you could have your IP address subpoenaed.

Biggest bunch of BS I've heard yet.

You mean 3 months for a second-offense stabbing? Many of us would agree.

So you think you have the right to threaten a judge or a lawyer because you don't like what they've done in their official capacities, i.e. sentencing or prosecution--specifically a federal judge or federal prosecutor?

Threatening a judge?! How could you possibly take that position based on my post. I never threatened anyone; I do happen to think it's an absurdly lenient sentence for the crime. Daron Wint should not have been walking around free after so many violent episodes over the years.

'Exposing and disciplining' a judge sounds like veiled threat. Assuming you are not in official position to legitimately do any of this--I just wonder how you would propose to 'discipline' a judge for executing a legal sentence. Go ahead, the Justice Department would love to hear it.

DOJ would not waste their time with such trivia. It's laughable.

[Anonymous]

I absolutely agree that the 89 day sentence was much too short. I don't know why the charge was so low or what the prosecutor asked for though. And "exposing" the judge is just transparency: nothing wrong there. Sunshine is the greatest disinfectant and a fundamental tenet of the American government. Unfortunately, there is almost no way to discipline a judge for a light sentence, but if there were, there is nothing wrong with suggesting it -- same with the prosecution.

It is hard to believe that a man who actively targeted and nearly killed a witness in pending case received such a light sentence. This is a violent premeditated crime. It is a shame he wasn't behind bars for years and the present tragedy averted. The dearth penalty is for people like this.