
This is just sad. There are lots of people in the world who are truly hurting and trying to cope with immensely difficult circumstances. Meghan isn’t one of them. It would be better for both you and the world if you spent your efforts white knighting for folks who actually could use some help. |
Teehee - there is another site that discusses H&M that had a bingo game for their word salads. "Genetic Pain", "authentic", "best life" etc. For public statements such as this one: ‘For me, it’s an added member of the family. It’s another team player . . . what we want to do is be able to carry out the right engagements, carry out our work and try and encourage others in the younger generation to be able to see the world in the correct sense.’ BARF |
Compassion isn't a zero sum game. Neither is basic sanity. You can be compassionate to people who are hurting and coping with immensely difficult circumstances, and you can also be compassionate to people like Meghan. Also, how do you know that Meghan isn't (or wasn't) "hurting and trying to cope with immensely difficult circumstances"? By all accounts, including her own, she was. Having millions of people hate you due to a media smear campaign, regardless of your station in life, does not sound easy. |
She is a healthy, beautiful woman who is insanely wealthy and privileged. She has a loving, doting husband and two healthy kids. If she’s ever feeling blue, Oprah and Serena are just a phone call away. Why do you insist on seeing her as a perpetual victim? |
You have access to internet, you speak, read, and write English, you're from an upper-middle class background, and you live in one of the highest-income areas in the world. By your logic, you are one of the most privileged people on this planet, and should never be afforded any compassion or empathy. And when did I say she was a perpetual victim? Don't put words in my mouth. |
You could say the same about Britney Spears. |
You all so jealous of Meghan, that it must you sick inside. The pettiness that must live in your hearts. I bet you folks don’t have any real friends at all. How can you? Who would want to be around someone who secretly posts such things about another person? |
The Markles brought all the scorn down on themselves with their tell-all tales on Oprah. No sympathy. |
That quote is from Prince Harry who also made the comment that the 1st Amendment is bonkers. So yeah, maybe we don't see the world in the "correct sense". Maybe "our truth" isn't the same as two grifters. |
This is the first time I’ve commented on this thread (I commented back around page 60 of Part 1) and the Meghan haters are just deranged. There’s really zero reason for the vitriol people feel for her, but that only seems to make them more crazed. |
Calm down. ![]() |
Agree. I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up. Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals? Because there are none. Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable. |
I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous! |
If they stopped saying provoking things, people would stop being provoked. Crazed? It's not the haterz who spouted "genetic pain" or "correct sense". The woe-is-me complaints about the awful First Amendment are actually not as bad, since they mirror the sentiment that other celebrities complain about, even if a British prince should never say such things. They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special. |
Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them. |