Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:/checking in/

I see Meghan haters are still just as psychotic.

/exits/

Hmm, I dig how you check in and exit. I'm definitely going to take a page from your book. I like it! Except the substance of your post. I'm in camp Meghan hate.

The fact that you're in any camp hating someone is a little pathetic.

But that's besides the point. Why do you hate Meghan, a person you don't know and will never meet?

DP. +1. Who spends energy hating someone they don’t now? Except Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell?

That’s different. They had very tangible negative impact on my life and the lives of people I care about. Meghan Markle has a charity and she wrote a kids book. The hate is bizarre.

Oh sweetie, she’s done lots more than this. Educate yourself!

Are you a gay man by any chance? I never hear women speaking like this to other women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

Why do you think it’s okay to personally insult others? Do you think that’s the kind of thing Meghan would approve of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The personal attacks on other posters is a bit much so I've been staying away despite having connected some interesting dots on Harry. Oh well guess you all will have out figure it out for yourselves.

Many had Harry figured out long before he met and married Meghan.

His exploitation of wounded military members, and his sham charity/Invictus games, are but one example but the most shameful.

His appalling level of self-promotion and back-patting regarding wounded veterans is disgusting. He acts like he invented the wounded warrior game concept. He didn't. The U.S. had their own official government sponsored Warrior Games long before. Yet it's barely given a nod on Invictus website, dismissively referring to is as "an existing domestic event in the US."

Imagine that. Glibly calling our official, U.S. government Wounded Warrior Games (sponsored by the American people/taxpayers) event a "domestic event."

But Harry copies it to drum up money here in the U.S. for his UK-based charity, which is beyond IRS oversight. But oh, according to the website,

"His military service and experience combined with his genuine compassion and understanding for those who serve their countries has played a significant part in raising awareness of wounded, injured and sick service personnel and veterans (WIS) and the role they can continue to play in society. It has also had an impact on the way in which disability is viewed in many of the countries involved."

It's outrageous that Invictus infers that without Harry, the plight of wounded servicemembers was virtually unknown. And without his impact we never would have been enlightened on how to view those with disabilities. It's absolutely sickening.

Not being American, I guess he might claim he's never heard of these U.S. organizations and their efforts, just to name a few:

Disabled American Veterans (founded 1920)
American Legion (founded 1919)
Veterans of Foreign Wars (founded 1899)

But what is his excuse for not knowing about U.K. based organizations which have been around for generations? I guess their activities and events are insignificant so he had to invent Invictus? Oh wait, maybe there's a reason or two: Self-promotion and ... dare I say it? Money.

1940 Dunkirk Veterans' Association
ABF The Soldiers' Charity
Armed Forces Bikers
Association of Harrogate Apprentices
Association of Jewish Ex-Servicemen and Women
Blesma, The Limbless Veterans
Blind Veterans UK
Bravehound
Britain's Bravest Manufacturing Company
British Armed Forces Federation
British League of Ex-Servicemen and Women
Burma Star Association
Care for Casualties
Combat Stress (charitable organisation)
Coming Home campaign
Comrades of the Great War
Erskine (charity)
Gardening Leave (charity)
Glen Art
Gurkha Justice Campaign
The Gurkha Museum
Haig Fund
Haig Housing
Healing the Wounds
Help for Heroes
Hounds for Heroes
National Association of Discharged Sailors and Soldiers
National Federation of Discharged and Demobilised Sailors and Soldiers
National Union of Ex-Service Men
Navy Records Society
Normandy Veterans' Association
Not Forgotten Association
Poppy Factory
RAF Benevolent Fund
Royal Air Forces Association
Royal Air Forces Escaping Society
Royal Artillery Association
Central Band of the Royal British Legion
Royal British Legion
Royal British Legion Industries
The Royal British Legion Riders Branch
The Royal Naval Benevolent Trust
Royal Signals Association
Sikh Pioneers & Sikh Light Infantry Association UK
Silver Badge Party
SSAFA
Suez Veterans' Association
The Gurkha Welfare Trust
Veteran Bandit
Veterans Aid
Victory Services Club
Walking With The Wounded
The Ypres League

[Anonymous]

^ um, ok

[Anonymous]

Whoa. You guys are plain nuts. I haven’t read every post but I thought this would have headlines and updates. Instead it’s people fighting with strangers. Seriously evaluate your actions. This isn’t normal behavior people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

Why do you think it’s okay to personally insult others? Do you think that’s the kind of thing Meghan would approve of?

Again, what here is a "personal insult"?

Unless you're trying to defend Piers Morgan... for which I'd have no words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whoa. You guys are plain nuts. I haven’t read every post but I thought this would have headlines and updates. Instead it’s people fighting with strangers. Seriously evaluate your actions. This isn’t normal behavior people.

Then don't read but don't act like you are better than everyone else. You are here so therefore you are the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

Why do you think it’s okay to personally insult others? Do you think that’s the kind of thing Meghan would approve of?

Again, what here is a "personal insult"?

Unless you're trying to defend Piers Morgan... for which I'd have no words.

Read the previous pages if you don’t believe posters have been personally attacking other posters. I’m not here to spoon feed you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

Why do you think it’s okay to personally insult others? Do you think that’s the kind of thing Meghan would approve of?

Again, what here is a "personal insult"?

Unless you're trying to defend Piers Morgan... for which I'd have no words.

Read the previous pages if you don’t believe posters have been personally attacking other posters. I’m not here to spoon feed you.

I'm seeing way more petulance and hand-wringing and insult-slinging from the self-named "hate Meghan camp".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The personal attacks on other posters is a bit much so I've been staying away despite having connected some interesting dots on Harry. Oh well guess you all will have out figure it out for yourselves.

Many had Harry figured out long before he met and married Meghan.

His exploitation of wounded military members, and his sham charity/Invictus games, are but one example but the most shameful.

His appalling level of self-promotion and back-patting regarding wounded veterans is disgusting. He acts like he invented the wounded warrior game concept. He didn't. The U.S. had their own official government sponsored Warrior Games long before. Yet it's barely given a nod on Invictus website, dismissively referring to is as "an existing domestic event in the US."

Imagine that. Glibly calling our official, U.S. government Wounded Warrior Games (sponsored by the American people/taxpayers) event a "domestic event."

But Harry copies it to drum up money here in the U.S. for his UK-based charity, which is beyond IRS oversight. But oh, according to the website,

"His military service and experience combined with his genuine compassion and understanding for those who serve their countries has played a significant part in raising awareness of wounded, injured and sick service personnel and veterans (WIS) and the role they can continue to play in society. It has also had an impact on the way in which disability is viewed in many of the countries involved."

It's outrageous that Invictus infers that without Harry, the plight of wounded servicemembers was virtually unknown. And without his impact we never would have been enlightened on how to view those with disabilities. It's absolutely sickening.

Not being American, I guess he might claim he's never heard of these U.S. organizations and their efforts, just to name a few:

Disabled American Veterans (founded 1920)
American Legion (founded 1919)
Veterans of Foreign Wars (founded 1899)

But what is his excuse for not knowing about U.K. based organizations which have been around for generations? I guess their activities and events are insignificant so he had to invent Invictus? Oh wait, maybe there's a reason or two: Self-promotion and ... dare I say it? Money.

1940 Dunkirk Veterans' Association
ABF The Soldiers' Charity
Armed Forces Bikers
Association of Harrogate Apprentices
Association of Jewish Ex-Servicemen and Women
Blesma, The Limbless Veterans
Blind Veterans UK
Bravehound
Britain's Bravest Manufacturing Company
British Armed Forces Federation
British League of Ex-Servicemen and Women
Burma Star Association
Care for Casualties
Combat Stress (charitable organisation)
Coming Home campaign
Comrades of the Great War
Erskine (charity)
Gardening Leave (charity)
Glen Art
Gurkha Justice Campaign
The Gurkha Museum
Haig Fund
Haig Housing
Healing the Wounds
Help for Heroes
Hounds for Heroes
National Association of Discharged Sailors and Soldiers
National Federation of Discharged and Demobilised Sailors and Soldiers
National Union of Ex-Service Men
Navy Records Society
Normandy Veterans' Association
Not Forgotten Association
Poppy Factory
RAF Benevolent Fund
Royal Air Forces Association
Royal Air Forces Escaping Society
Royal Artillery Association
Central Band of the Royal British Legion
Royal British Legion
Royal British Legion Industries
The Royal British Legion Riders Branch
The Royal Naval Benevolent Trust
Royal Signals Association
Sikh Pioneers & Sikh Light Infantry Association UK
Silver Badge Party
SSAFA
Suez Veterans' Association
The Gurkha Welfare Trust
Veteran Bandit
Veterans Aid
Victory Services Club
Walking With The Wounded
The Ypres League

Ok crazytown...guess no one was interested in figuring it out so you did it for us.

[Anonymous]

With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What personal attack are the haters lamenting about? Are their feelings hurt? Funny how the most vitriolic cyber bullies tend to have the thinnest skin. See: Piers Morgan, all of Fox Channel.

Why do you think it’s okay to personally insult others? Do you think that’s the kind of thing Meghan would approve of?

Again, what here is a "personal insult"?

Unless you're trying to defend Piers Morgan... for which I'd have no words.

Read the previous pages if you don’t believe posters have been personally attacking other posters. I’m not here to spoon feed you.

I'm seeing way more petulance and hand-wringing and insult-slinging from the self-named "hate Meghan camp".

Nope. Most H&M “haters” want to talk about H&M. Which makes sense because that’s the subject of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:/checking in/

I see Meghan haters are still just as psychotic.

/exits/

Hmm, I dig how you check in and exit. I'm definitely going to take a page from your book. I like it! Except the substance of your post. I'm in camp Meghan hate.

The fact that you're in any camp hating someone is a little pathetic.

But that's besides the point. Why do you hate Meghan, a person you don't know and will never meet?

DP. +1. Who spends energy hating someone they don’t now? Except Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell?

And why do you spend energy falling over yourself to defend someone you’ll never meet?

Because that’s what moral people do. People with character. People who have class. People who have been raised properly. People who know it’s trashy to hate on anyone (other than Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and I’ll add Harvey Weinstein). Hating is low class and petty (unless, again the hate is on Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and Harvey Weinstein).

If someone was hating on you, bad mouthing you, non celebrity you, celebrity you, I would defend you as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:/checking in/

I see Meghan haters are still just as psychotic.

/exits/

Hmm, I dig how you check in and exit. I'm definitely going to take a page from your book. I like it! Except the substance of your post. I'm in camp Meghan hate.

The fact that you're in any camp hating someone is a little pathetic.

But that's besides the point. Why do you hate Meghan, a person you don't know and will never meet?

DP. +1. Who spends energy hating someone they don’t now? Except Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell?

And why do you spend energy falling over yourself to defend someone you’ll never meet?

Because that’s what moral people do. People with character. People who have class. People who have been raised properly. People who know it’s trashy to hate on anyone (other than Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and I’ll add Harvey Weinstein). Hating is low class and petty (unless, again the hate is on Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and Harvey Weinstein).

If someone was hating on you, bad mouthing you, non celebrity you, celebrity you, I would defend you as well.

We should start a drinking game every time you say “hate”.