Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Markles brought all the scorn down on themselves with their tell-all tales on Oprah. No sympathy.

This is the first time I’ve commented on this thread (I commented back around page 60 of Part 1) and the Meghan haters are just deranged. There’s really zero reason for the vitriol people feel for her, but that only seems to make them more crazed.

If they stopped saying provoking things, people would stop being provoked. Crazed? It's not the haterz who spouted "genetic pain" or "correct sense". The woe-is-me complaints about the awful First Amendment are actually not as bad, since they mirror the sentiment that other celebrities complain about, even if a British prince should never say such things.

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

Not triggered. Bored. The pandemic is nearing an end but it's not over yet. There's not much else to do than marvel at the next ridiculous thing that H&M say. And get attacked by "moral" posters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Markles brought all the scorn down on themselves with their tell-all tales on Oprah. No sympathy.

This is the first time I’ve commented on this thread (I commented back around page 60 of Part 1) and the Meghan haters are just deranged. There’s really zero reason for the vitriol people feel for her, but that only seems to make them more crazed.

If they stopped saying provoking things, people would stop being provoked. Crazed? It's not the haterz who spouted "genetic pain" or "correct sense". The woe-is-me complaints about the awful First Amendment are actually not as bad, since they mirror the sentiment that other celebrities complain about, even if a British prince should never say such things.

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

Not triggered. Bored. The pandemic is nearing an end but it's not over yet. There's not much else to do than marvel at the next ridiculous thing that H&M say. And get attacked by "moral" posters.

No one should ignore the fact that Harry uses wounded servicemembers to drum up money for his faux charity. Why is it that none of his fans here want to defend him on that matter? It's always radio silence and quickly change to subject back to name-calling and tossing around "hate" at anyone who brings up legitimate criticisms.

[Anonymous]

I can’t wait until they are old news. No one cares anymore. Waity Katey waited and won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t wait until they are old news. No one cares anymore. Waity Katey waited and won.

+1

She sure did. Good for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Markles brought all the scorn down on themselves with their tell-all tales on Oprah. No sympathy.

This is the first time I’ve commented on this thread (I commented back around page 60 of Part 1) and the Meghan haters are just deranged. There’s really zero reason for the vitriol people feel for her, but that only seems to make them more crazed.

If they stopped saying provoking things, people would stop being provoked. Crazed? It's not the haterz who spouted "genetic pain" or "correct sense". The woe-is-me complaints about the awful First Amendment are actually not as bad, since they mirror the sentiment that other celebrities complain about, even if a British prince should never say such things.

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

[Anonymous]

15 minute famous. Yawn … not like William & Kate royalty in history forever

[Anonymous]

Oh oh oh new tactic! Act bored and above it all. Much needed improvement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh oh oh new tactic! Act bored and above it all. Much needed improvement.

You seem to think this is some sort of competition. Why can’t you just let people criticize a couple of celebrities? What’s it to you? It’s like you feel a duty to serve as a righteous warrior in defense of Meghan’s honor. Bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

This article does not provide any evidence that Harry was exploiting service members. It says a concert was canceled due to Covid and both Amazon and Netflix have interest in streaming fundraisers for the invictus games. how many live concerts did you go to last year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

This article does not provide any evidence that Harry was exploiting service members. It says a concert was canceled due to Covid and both Amazon and Netflix have interest in streaming fundraisers for the invictus game. how many live concerts did you go to last year?

Why is Haz suing again?
“The Sunday Times has now added a note to its original story confirming it has received a legal complaint over its article, which remains online.”

If it is still online must be standing by their report.

“ Prince Harry has threatened legal action over claims a fundraiser for the Invictus Games was canceled due to the Netflix mega-deal”.

The embarrassing video of the pitch to Disnay? Well, Harry ditched out in his

[Anonymous]

Oops ditched out on this:
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/prince-harry-missed-service-royal-3738727
To embarrass himself in front of the head of Disney getting voiceover work for his wife.

There is video and even Beyonce cringed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

And you don’t know how to read.

The concert venue couldn’t confirm that they would be open. That’s a pretty important part of why the event was canceled.