Grand Jury Issues Sealed Indictments in Mueller Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

1. Name someone in the Senate or House Leadership who came out, week one against Mueller. We’ll wait here (for a long time). Please provide a link. Not Breitbart.

2. Tell us what has been uncovered about Mueller that has changed everyone’s mind. Again. Link your source. Not Breitbart. Or Fox News on this one.

1) Ted Cruz
2) Everyone's mind? Nothing changes everyone's mind about anything. Mueller's relationship with Comey, as well as the latest news that Mueller was in charge of the FBI during the Uranium deal.

You can go back and find links you like.

Ah, Ted "Mr. Shutdown" Cruz. Well, in that case, nope, still haven't changed my mind about Mueller's suitability.

Your choice. In the end none of this matters to me personally. I have enough to keep myself and my family quite happy for the rest of our lives

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

Your analogy was dumb and nonsensical. I'm glad you sleep well. I hope it continues, in the coming days.

There is nothing I can do to change it. If America implodes, you all have to live in the sh*thole you created. I was in the Lenox Mall yesterday - my GOD, so MANY nasty people. One girl screaming racist at a woman who would not take the free crap she was trying to peddle. Armed guards everywhere, and thugs arguing with those guards. Ad nauseum. I have enough money to plant myself in a little paradise of my own and live quite quietly and nicely. Do you?

I meant, I hope your good sleep continues...oh, never mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

So you are saying that, the government— Trump and the House and Senate Republicans, have turned their guns on the iAmerican people. Interesting take for a Trumpkin. But accurate.

DP. That's not how I read it. It is the liberals who still cannot accept their loss who are attacking the presidency and the people's choice, per the Electoral College. Sore losers, the lot of you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing I can do to change it. If America implodes, you all have to live in the sh*thole you created. I was in the Lenox Mall yesterday - my GOD, so MANY nasty people. One girl screaming racist at a woman who would not take the free crap she was trying to peddle. Armed guards everywhere, and thugs arguing with those guards. Ad nauseum. I have enough money to plant myself in a little paradise of my own and live quite quietly and nicely. Do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

Your analogy was dumb and nonsensical. I'm glad you sleep well. I hope it continues, in the coming days.

There is nothing I can do to change it. If America implodes, you all have to live in the sh*thole you created. I was in the Lenox Mall yesterday - my GOD, so MANY nasty people. One girl screaming racist at a woman who would not take the free crap she was trying to peddle. Armed guards everywhere, and thugs arguing with those guards. Ad nauseum. I have enough money to plant myself in a little paradise of my own and live quite quietly and nicely. Do you?

I meant, I hope your good sleep continues...oh, never mind.

I know what you meant. I'm telling you that in the end it doesn't affect me either way from a financial standpoint. I also know who's fighting on the surface and behind the scenes.

[Anonymous]

What kind of person gets their benes from coming on an anonymous internet board and bragging about how much money they have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What kind of person gets their benes from coming on an anonymous internet board and bragging about how much money they have?

Someone who doesn't give a crap what liberal think of her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What kind of person gets their benes from coming on an anonymous internet board and bragging about how much money they have?

Go over to the money thread. There you'll find couples worrying that their $3 million savings, together with their $11.000 monthly pensions, might not be enough to squeak by in retirement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House is going to be drafting a MadLibs style pardon this weekend.

You win the thread so far.

+1 Trump is out partying this weekend, because he thinks he can pardon his way out of this mess.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/ivanka-trump-birthday-surprise

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What kind of person gets their benes from coming on an anonymous internet board and bragging about how much money they have?

Someone who doesn't give a crap what liberal think of her?

She's not making much sense. She's had a bit to drink. It's all good.

Tomorrow we'll see what's up Mueller's sleeve. Unless he fakes us all out and makes us wait till Tuesday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently, Hillary was elected, at least according to Corey Lewandowski!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/357623-lewandowski-the-focus-should-be-on-the-continued-lies-of-the

And why is anyone listening to anything he says.

But sure. Thanks for reminding us he exists. #LockHimUp

It was just such a weird slip. Why would he even mention the Clinton administration? It ended almost 20 years ago! So three possibilities:
1. He knows they didn't win/fairly.
2. Republicans truly cannot govern and can only struggle uselessly against an adversary (even if it's only in their minds).
3. He's an idiot.

It's three. Lewandowski is a low-IQ idiot. A real dimwit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

1. Name someone in the Senate or House Leadership who came out, week one against Mueller. We’ll wait here (for a long time). Please provide a link. Not Breitbart.

2. Tell us what has been uncovered about Mueller that has changed everyone’s mind. Again. Link your source. Not Breitbart. Or Fox News on this one.

1) Ted Cruz
2) Everyone's mind? Nothing changes everyone's mind about anything. Mueller's relationship with Comey, as well as the latest news that Mueller was in charge of the FBI during the Uranium deal.

You can go back and find links you like.

1. “Ted Cruz says Mueller Right Choice to Lead Russia Investigation”. From a real newspaper. With a link. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/donald-trump-1/2017/05/19/ted-cruz-says-mueller-right-choice-lead-russia-investigation

Want to try again? There are 99 other Senators.

2. This was all known by Ted Cruz when he enthusiastically endorsed Mueller. The uranium deal was known. And no one cared. Because nothingburger routine transaction vetted by treasury. The fact he was head of the FBI at the time? Also known. The fact Mueller and Comey overlapped at the FBI and knew each other professionally? Also known. If I am wrong on any of this, feel free to correct me. With links. To Not Breitbart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

He never leaks? BWAAHHAHHAAA. Then CNN is lying.

Or a grand juror leaked. Or Courthouse staff. Or a Judge. Or defense attorneys who were notified. Or a target, who was notified. The list of non DOJ folks who knew is lengthy.

And Mueller is ultimately responsible. I don't see much fury from him about those leaks publicly. Do you?

No. Mueller is not responsible if a Judge’s law clerk leaks. Or the Clerk of Court leaks. Or a defense attorney leaks. And you don’t see public fury from him. Because you never hear anything from him. Because he is a grownup and a professional. Which means he is quietly trying to find the leak. And doing his job well in as low profile a way as possible. IYou may think it is normal for leaders to have a twitter meltdowns and scream at people to DO SOMETHING! In fact, it is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

So you are saying that, the government— Trump and the House and Senate Republicans, have turned their guns on the iAmerican people. Interesting take for a Trumpkin. But accurate.

DP. That's not how I read it. It is the liberals who still cannot accept their loss who are attacking the presidency and the people's choice, per the Electoral College. Sore losers, the lot of you!

DP. Has anyone ever seen a more sore bunch of winners? It’s uncanny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


The dishonesty was Trump stealing the election. He has projected every single one of his wrongdoings. When he said the election was rigged, he wasn't lying.

Wrong. Trump didn't steal the election. He won the election, because there are a lot of not-very-smart, easily manipulated people out there (and Hillary was not a very appealing candidate to lots of people.) The issue with Trump, and it's one that will hopefully bring him down, is that he's in hock to Russian interests, both govt and non-govt, not that there's any difference there. They own him. Trump is a desperate coward, a really bad actor, surrounded by really bad actors. Hopefully, he'll get what he has coming. Time will tell.