Worse than EVERYONE. That poster tried playing the pathetic “I’m actually more educated than everyone!” card, but then they were at least wise enough to STFU before anyone started matching their posts up with that bravado. |
+1. He's not a US citizen. He is here at US discretion. |
Why do you think you are a citizen person of the US? It is obvious you are not. |
Yeah it surely is crazy to see that is what modern liberalism and the Democratic party is today, supporting things you would that would be a Conservative war hawk would support, while blaming everything on the far left. Is this what DCUM is full of or what? What's the general political consensus? |
Looking at this, it appears the federal government can legally deport greed card holders based on their advocating or expressing support for terrorist acts. That said, the terrorist label has become a red herring. Clearly Palestinians and Israelis disagree on who gets to live where on the land. A world where wars are fought as humanely as possible is also clearly a good thing. But the Palestinians don't have an army, air force or navy. I'm pretty sure Israel would never allow that. So is it surprising the Palestinians resort to terror and other asymmetrical tactics? Should Palestinian jihadists declare war on Israel and attempt to march on Israeli military bases? If the Palestinians are denied access to a regular conventional army it seems a terror response is to be expected. If a Palestinian militant goes home to an apartment building and the IDF blows the building up killing dozens of people, is the claim that Hamas hides among civilians absolve the IDF from any culpability? |
Plenty of oppressed people in the world. A few great leaders found non violent ways to protest and free them: MLK, Gandhi to name a couple. Their causes were no less just. This guy is not one of those great leaders. He has called for and celebrated violence against civilians. He has therefore violated the terms of his probationary acceptance into the US and needs to be deported. Why would we accept any person advocating for violence? It puts our own country and citizens at risk. The ends do not justify the means. |
I’m curious: do you understand just how extremist you are considered outside your radical left bubble? Do you understand that across the country, you’d be considered the unwell one? |
He didn't commit any violence, nor did he advocate for violence in the US. I think there are many Jewish American Zionists who also put this country at risk, and put Israel's interests above the US'. Nelson Mandela also used violence. I guess he was a terrorist in your eyes. |
Simple, he is not a Palestinian supporter. He is a Hamas supporter. He distributed Hamas literature. Hamas is designated as a terror group. Bye bye. |
Seriously, we told the proPalestinians who weren't going to support Harris that Trump was going to be worse for them, and they FAFO. |
DP I don’t give AF to litigate this particular guy’s experience at all (I’m fine with whatever lawful resolution decides his fate), but I do feel compelled to ask: How do YOU square YOUR beliefs when the foreign nation he’s accused to criticizing was literally, irrefutably founded last century through terrorism? Do you refuse to accept that irrefutable fact, or do you hypocritically believe that it was acceptable then, but not now? |
Coming out in favor of 10/7, including the kidnapping, torture, and murder of children, is unequivocally terrorism in my book, and the books of anyone with a conscience. It’s unbelievable to me that the Democrats have managed to find themselves on the opposite (and wrong) side of a 90/10 issue again. |
DP. You are showing your ignorance with your statement about Mandela. His own party admitted to atrocities, eventually. And it is flat-out delusional to compare Khalil to Mandela. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/13/world/party-led-by-mandela-now-owns-up-to-atrocities.html |
Extremist? How so? For having a moral compass at the center of my belief system? For criticizing the indiscriminate killing of innocents? For agreeing with 95%+ of the global population that the right of self-defense does not authorize genocidal actions taken by a foreign nation? For believing the founding fathers of my country, who engaged in quite a few acts that would be characterized as “terrorism” today, enshrined my right to free speech centuries ago? Do tell, self-anointed everyman! |
According to SCOTUS, hate speech is part of free speech. He can say he supports Hamas (free speech) but as long as he hasn't materially supported them, he didn't break any laws. |